Our View

Our View: It's all about the language

Linguists must be having a field day with the debate currently raging before the state Senate Judiciary Committee.

Members voted 6-2 on Monday to refer a ballot initiative that would eliminate public financing of candidate campaigns.

The measure was originally adopted in 1998 as the “Clean Elections Act,” and allows taxpayers to deduct donations to a fund that is available to candidates running for office.

The idea behind the program is to reduce the influence of special interest contributions and finance people who might not otherwise have the means to become candidates.

Business groups and conservative advocates oppose the law, arguing the program is a taxpayer subsidy.

Hence, the proposal approved by the Senate committee on Monday is called the “No Taxpayer Subsidy For Political Campaigns Act.”

What we find interesting is the importance lawmakers are placing on what to call this proposed amendment to the state Constitution.

The phrase “clean elections,” creates the idea that fraud, undue influence and other unscrupulous acts, are eliminated thanks to the...

Midweek Morsels: High school newspaper having a banner year

Quote of the day: “I had a match, but she had a lighter; I had a flame, but she had a fire; I was bright, but she was much...

Our View: A decision not as easy as it seems

Working with a special interest group, a contingent of state lawmakers has proposed legislation to collect sales tax from companies with...

Our View: A measure without meaning

 A

 report issued last month by the Congressional Research Service, a highly-respected, non-partisan group that...

Our Opinion: Keeping firearm bills in our sights

We will watch state lawmakers closely this week to find out whether several bills relating to firearms and others that limit the power...

Our Opinion: Flying cars and future costs

A bad economy, improved fuel efficiency and vehicles that last longer offer something of a “perfect storm” for the...

Commentary: Sheriff calls for support on immigration

Two weeks ago, the National Sheriffs Association convened its annual winter meeting in Washington D.C....

Commentary: Speaker explains his redistricting proposal

In ordinary circumstances, the most politically safe and easy course of action is to do nothing. On the other hand, it’s...

On Your Mind

premium content On Your Mind: Jan. 28 to Feb. 3
LOCAL-STATE Jan. 28 What House Speaker Andy Tobin has decided to do by re-doing the congressional district maps and putting them before the voters is nothing short of gerrymandering and it will be in the courts for years. Gerrymandering is illegal. Gov. Brewer did what a lot of us would like to do. She speaks for all of us who are angry with Obama’s policies. While he is out and about courting the Hispanic vote, he’s thumbed his...
premium content On Your Mind: Jan. 25 to Jan.26
EDITOR’S NOTE: On Your Mind is a section of the newspaper that allows people to voice their opinions anonymously. Read the entries with the idea that sometimes it is the same person making multiple comments; that opinions of callers may or may not be based on facts. In some cases, entries are edited. Comments are limited to 100 words. Some comments submitted are not published for a variety of reasons. The printing of these opinions does...
premium content On Your Mind: Jan. 20 to Jan. 27
EDITOR’S NOTE: On Your Mind is a section of the newspaper that allows people to voice their opinions anonymously. Read the entries with the idea that sometimes it is the same person making multiple comments; that opinions of callers may or may not be based on facts. In some cases, entries are edited. Comments are limited to 100 words. Some comments submitted are not published for a variety of reasons. The printing of these opinions does...
premium content On Your Mind: Jan. 13 to Jan. 20
EDITOR’S NOTE: On Your Mind is a section of the newspaper that allows people to voice their opinions anonymously. Read the entries with the idea that sometimes it is the same person making multiple comments; that opinions of callers may or may not be based on facts. In some cases, entries are edited. Comments are limited to 100 words. Some comments submitted are not published for a variety of reasons. The printing of these opinions does...
premium content On Your Mind: Jan. 7 to Jan.13
EDITOR’S NOTE: On Your Mind is a section of the newspaper that allows people to voice their opinions anonymously. Read the entries with the idea that sometimes it is the same person making multiple comments; that opinions of callers may or may not be based on facts. In some cases, entries are edited. Comments are limited to 100 words. Some comments submitted are not published for a variety of reasons. The printing of these opinions does...

Letters to the Editor

premium content Our Readers' Views: A marijuana windfall
Feb 09 2012

To the Editor:

Governor finds windfall in the marijuana...

premium content Our Readers' Views: Solar panels are an issue
Feb 09 2012

To the Editor: 

Just “some blow-back from the...

premium content Our Readers' Views: Residents need to know issues
Feb 09 2012

To the Editor:

The Jan. 31 letter from Denise Crandall had some fairly amusing (to me) statements and questions. She questions how Dr. Silver knows what the fort’s missions are. With some Internet research, she too could know the fort’s missions. With further research, she could probably figure out which missions could be done at other military installations and which...

premium content Our Readers' Views: Pretty soon it’s real money
Feb 09 2012

To the Editor:

The old adage “figures lie and liars figure” never fit better when applied to the recent letter to the editor, “Democrats don’t raise the debt.” “Dutch” uses percentages to make a case that the Democrats don’t increase the debt at the rate Republicans do. Dutch uses what we call “fuzzy” math. Let’s use...

premium content Our Readers' Views: Thanks for your donation
Feb 08 2012

To the Editor: 

The Sierra Vista Table Tennis Club...

premium content Our Readers' Views: An early morning visitor
Feb 08 2012

To the Editor:

I would just like to thank our local fire...

premium content Our Readers' Views: A nightmare scenario
Feb 08 2012

To the Editor:

So, Denise Crandall of Whetstone, where have you been hiding? Your letter on Robin Silver published Jan. 31, blew my mind. You write beautifully and I hope to hear much more from you down the road.

As for Dr. Silver, it’s high time someone took down this pretentious, self-important windbag and Crandall simply, point-by-point, took apart this...

premium content Our Readers' Views: Jobs report result of state actions
Feb 07 2012

To the Editor:

Yesterday (Feb 3, 2012) we learned that there were 243,000 new jobs created last month nationwide, that this pushed the unemployment figure down to 8.3 percent, the lowest since Feb 2009. What’s more, this is a continuation of a trend which has been going on since September when the unemployment was at 9.0 percent, down from 9.1 percent in August. Also,...

premium content Our Readers' Views: Kudos for Bisbee musical
Feb 07 2012

To the Editor:

Hooray for the return of musical theater to...

Guest Columnists

Commentary: Sheriff calls for support on immigration

Two weeks ago, the National Sheriffs Association convened its annual winter meeting in Washington D.C.

We generally hold this meeting to coincide with members of Congress coming back to the jobs we expect them to pay attention to. Sadly, the Senate was still mostly adjourned and the majority of House members were still back home. I am writing you, not to disparage Congress, but to bring new attention to the outrageous and atrocious antics of our own U.S. Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security.

Commentary: Speaker explains his redistricting proposal

In ordinary circumstances, the most politically safe and easy course of action is to do nothing. On the other hand, it’s especially risky to foment actions that would alter the outcomes of voter initiatives. In the case of the Redistricting Commission, it’s important to conclude one way or another whether the intent and desires of the voters have been violated. If they have been, we should provide voters the mechanism with which to fix the situation. It’s obvious to me the process was hijacked.