New reports released about shooting of deputy as border action heats up
Fri, 06/18/2010 - 12:01am
Printer-friendly version
Send to friendDeputy shooting
A southern Arizona sheriff’s office has released some reports of their investigation in the desert shooting of a deputy, hoping to squelch rumors that the incident was a hoax timed to inflame the debate over illegal immigration and cartel bloodshed.
The independent Department of Public Safety crime scene reports detail parts of the frantic April 30 search for Pinal County Deputy Louis Puroll after he called 911 and reported he had been ambushed by suspected marijuana smugglers in the desert about 50 miles south of Phoenix.
If you find a correction for this story, please contact our editorial department
Related Terms:
Good News on the Gun shipment being stopped. We have to stop allowing guns to
back to the Mexican cartels. I read the “Frontline” report on how these guns
are obtained. 1. Gun Shops, bought by a 3rd party with legal ID 2. Legally
licensed gun dealers that are corrupt It goes without saying that those
transporting should be prosecuted, but additionally, once these weapons are
seized, I think it is important to identify the source of these weapons/ammo
and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those that provide these
weapons to those that take them down to Mexico.
Appears to be more illegal activity by Illegals from South of the Border. And
to think there are American citizens who support this activity by Illegals.
how the liberal ignores what is coming into the US? Just amazing. Caveat:
According to Ran and Henry, this isn’t occurring. We don’t have criminals
coming across the border. They have been vehemently disputing anyone’s claims
regarding this over the past few weeks. Herald, are you making this stuff up
or is it really happening? Surely criminals AREN’T coming here *gasp*, it
can’t be true!!
“According to Ran and Henry, this isn’t occurring.”
No, that’s according to your fantasies about what Henry and I have said. It’s
pretty well established now that any resemblance between what other people
say and what you hear is purely coincidental.
“They have been vehemently disputing anyone’s claims regarding this”
Only the false/unfounded ones. And not even all of those. If you don’t like
being “disputed”, there’s a simple solution: don’t post nonsense. Of course,
that won’t be EASY for you, but it IS simple.
You have denied every time it has been said here. If you believe they are
crossing, why do you argue whenever someone brings it up in a point? Seems to
me you disagree with people just to disagree. You don’t argue over the point
of the article, you just nitpick what people say. Ran the nitpicker. I think
that suits you well. Can’t wait for the next installment my stalker… P.S.
The herald posts articles about captures almost each week—I guess that is
nonsense too?
You made it very clear that there was never any violence occurring at the
border or committed by illegals residing in this state.
You also said Elian Gonzales never existed on this planet
You also said the founding fathers fought for independence from King George
because they wanted higher taxes, less liberties, no property rights, & no
representation in Parliament.
C’mon now Ran…. Nobody’s buying what you’re selling!! Time to close up shop
& retire your misleading, misrepresenting, distorting, & flat out lying
behavior back to the pre-K playground where you brought it from.
if it were someone else making those claims, I might accuse him of making
stuff up.
But, given some of the downright loony things you’ve posted in the past, I
guess we’ll have to seriously consider the possibility that you’ve actually
deluded yourself into believing that you read those statements.
He also said the white house never saifd unemployment wouldnt go above 8% if
we passed the porkulus.
And you never pointed out where it did.
Here comes the orator with his flood of words and his drop of reason.