News : DPS cuts leaving impacts locally : Sierra Vista, AZ
Home News Opinion Sports Community Blogs Lifestyle Classifieds Entertainment Archives About Us

Today's Weather


Weather Magnet

DPS cuts leaving impacts locally

Trickles to city budgets, how cases are pursued

By Derek Jordan
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 - 06:19:37 am MST

SIERRA VISTA — Cochise County law enforcement agencies are being charged more than $150,000 for their use of the Arizona Department of Public Safety’s crime labs after state budget cuts resulted in reduced funding of the service.

The costs are based on the 2,333 instances in which local law enforcement sent evidence to the labs to be examined during the 2007-2008 fiscal year, said Phil Case, budget officer for the Arizona Department of Public Safety.

The DPS was aware budget cuts might have happened when the state budget was finalized over the summer, he said.


“We knew it was on the table, but we didn’t know how likely it was to happen or to what extent it was going to happen,” Case said. “We were surprised by the extent of the cut, for sure.”

In June, budget cuts to the DPS crime labs totaled $7.8 million. The state also passed a bill, HB 2462, that allows the agency to charge for lab costs for the first time.

“Basically, municipalities have been getting that service for many years for free,” said Jeanine L’Ecuyer, spokeswoman for the governor’s office, “and DPS, because of the situation we have with the budget, is simply not able to absorb that cost anymore.”

L’Ecuyer said the state is facing a $1.9 billion budget shortfall for the current fiscal year.

“Which means we are going to have some painful belt-tightening going on,” she said.

Case said the DPS crime labs do a variety of evidence investigation, including testing blood samples for drugs or alcohol, discovering DNA on items and/or matching DNA to a suspect, and testing weapons for ballistics information.

There are four crime labs in the state, located in Lake Havasu City, Tucson, Flagstaff and Phoenix.

In an effort to reduce the amount of costs it would need to recoup, the DPS has reallocated funds from its Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement Mission, or GIITEM, to lower the $7.8 million reduction to $2.6 million, Case said.

“It won’t affect the current level of operations,” he said. “GIITEMs budget has increased dramatically over the last few years.”

Case said he doubts a similar shifting of funds would be possible if budget cuts continue.

“We don’t anticipate being able to do that next year,” he said.

Cochise County law enforcement agencies owe $157,133.41 for crime lab use last fiscal year, according to DPS documents.

Ken Strobeck, executive director of the Arizona League of Cities and Towns, said Mississippi is the only other state that charges local law enforcement for use of its crime labs.

The state sent out an intergovernmental agreement to pay the fees to all city and county law enforcement across the state in September, Strobeck said.

The league has advised city officials and law enforcement to not pay the fees yet.

“Our advice was to not sign the IGA and not pay the assessment until we can approve the constitutionality of the bill that enacted that provision,” Strobeck said. “At this point we have discussed this issue with our attorneys, but we haven’t had any resolutions as far as getting state agencies to undo that particular resolution.”

The Sierra Vista Police Department owes a total of $63,389.95 for its use of the crime lab over the course of the last fiscal year, said Deputy Chief Tom Alinen.

“Last year we sent in 833 cases to the state crime lab,” Alinen said. “I think they’ve sent us one bill, but we haven’t paid it.”

Alinen said the DPS planned to recoup its cost in three payments over the next few months.

The first payment was due Oct. 15, he said.

“We look at it as a case of double taxation of our citizens,” he said.

Sierra Vista City Manager Chuck Potucek said any payments for the crime lab would come from a general fund, and not impact the police department directly.

“It’s all general tax dollars,” Potucek said. “It wouldn’t be a direct hit on the police department, it would be a hit on the city overall, the taxpayers of the city.”

According to a list of Cochise County agencies and their fees given to the Sierra Vista police by the DPS, a total of $13,490.18 is being charged to the Benson Police Department for its crime lab use, causing the department to be more prudent with costs.

“One of the things is that the Cochise County Attorney’s Office requires that we have lab reports before we submit a case,” said Lt. Paul Moncada, public information officer for the Benson Police Department.

Officers are now looking even closer to determine if a prosecution is likely before sending off evidence to be processed at the crime labs, he said.

The department is also waiting to hear the pleas of suspects of misdemeanor crimes before submitting evidence to labs, in the chance that they plead guilty, he said.

The Benson Police Department sent 269 cases to the DPS crime labs last fiscal year.

“I don’t know where we would take it out of at this point,” Moncada said about funds to pay off lab fees.

Some of the new fees being implemented by the Department of Public Safety include $87 for a blood collection kit, $220.50 to test bodily fluids for drugs or alcohol, and $2,370 per year for each breath test instrument, the cost of which includes instrument set-up, repair and training.

Even though these additional costs add even more of a strain to budgets already spread thin, officers on both sides say they understand it is out of their hands.

“We sympathize with the fact that the DPS is having a shortfall with budget money,” Alinen said.

The new fees have not had a negative impact on the professional ties between the agencies, he said.

“We have a great working relationship.”

Case expressed similar sentiments.

“We understand that it’s a real problem for the local (departments),” Case said. “I think it is understood that they understand the situation DPS is in.”

He added, “We’re trying to get through this together.”

Herald/Review reporter Derek Jordan can be reached at 515-4680 or by e-mail at derek.jordan@svherald.com.

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Just money wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:43 PM:

    " I would rather have the Sierra Vista budget over ride money going to fight crime instead of putting flutes in someone's mouth. I think we should have a vote on higher property tax or higher sales tax to compensate for the lack of state funding. It takes money to fight crime. If we can get these drugs off our streets many of our problems would be solved. "

    lawman wrote on Nov 16, 2008 11:45 AM:

    " Stats,
    Overwhelmingly most of the tests for MJ that I have seen are for DUI Drug. The others for MJ are a small Medtox urine kit that gives you immediate results at the jail (no lab fee). How would you like a DUI drug to be handled. Shall we let them swerve all over the road and kill someone because "it's only pot". "

    No Free Ride wrote on Nov 16, 2008 11:34 AM:

    " If the Cardinal's players and upper management paid income tax this would be a non-issue. "

    concerned wrote on Nov 16, 2008 10:29 AM:

    " Im not really worried about it. GO out on a Friday night, do you really think it's necessary to see a patrol car every 5 seconds? When people visit from out of town they usually ask me if marshall law was declared here. Tweekers aren't hard to find or catch. We don't need to keep hiring more officers to battle them. And yes, that is SVs biggest problem. "

    How It Works wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:10 AM:

    " If an individual is stopped on the I-10 off ramp in Benson for reckless driving or DUI there are potentially three agencies that could perform the stop; DPS, Sheriff’s Deputy or Benson Police. The only things that do not change are the violator and the crimes. It still ends up as the State of Arizona vs defendant. If lab fees are required they should be provided no matter the department of the officer. The Sheriff’s Deputy nor the Benson Police officer should not have to consider budget constraints before deciding to. "

    It would seem wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:00 AM:

    " It would seem that the lab work for the most part is in prep of State of Arizona law enforcement and not local. When the case comes to court the papers say it is The State of Arizona vs defendent, meaning the law enforcement personnel are acting as agents of the State of Arizona. And thus the State should be providing these lab services to their agents. "

    Stats wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:39 AM:

    " Of the 2333 instances that they used the crime lab, probably about 2000 were to test pot. What a waste! "

    Double Taxation wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:14 AM:

    " Folks, this is a form of double taxation. I pay state taxes as do many of you. The city should not be saddled with this expense. If the city has to pay it, then why should we pay STATE taxes? "

Multimedia



In Tomorrow's Herald


DOING BUSINESS: Locals learning how to seek out government contracts.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement



Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events: