Home News Opinion Sports Community Blogs Lifestyle Classifieds Entertainment Archives About Us

Today's Weather


Weather Magnet

Jurors saw ‘gaping holes’ in case against Border Patrol agent

Two say poor sheriff’s investigation, other factors brought doubt

By Jonathon Shacat
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 - 06:19:37 am MST

BISBEE — A sloppy investigation by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office was a significant factor that led a majority of the jurors to feel Border Patrol Agent Nicholas Corbett was not guilty of a crime, according to two of the jurors.

Corbett was charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide for killing Francisco Dominguez-Rivera, an illegal immigrant from Mexico, on Jan. 12, 2007, near Naco.

Prosecutors alleged Corbett shot Dominguez-Rivera from his left hand as he was surrendering, while the defense claimed the agent fired the gun from his right hand to defend himself from the rock-wielding individual.

Francisco Dominguez-Rivera was killed by Border Patrol Agent Nicholas Corbett in this area of the desert between Naco and Douglas. The U.S.-Mexico border fence is visible in the background. (Jonathon Shacat-Herald/Review)


Corbett’s trial started Oct. 21 in U.S. District Court in Tucson. Judge David Bury declared a mistrial Nov. 4 when the jurors deadlocked.

The Herald/Review attempted to interview some of the jurors outside the court after the trial, but they declined to comment. However, two jurors were recently contacted by the newspaper by phone.

The names of the two jurors are not being printed to protect their anonymity. They agreed to be identified by their court assigned juror numbers. They are both men. One lives in Tucson, and the other lives in Safford.

Juror number 40, who was the jury’s foreman, said that by the end of the deliberations, the 12-member panel had voted not guilty of second-degree murder, not guilty of manslaughter, and 11-1 to acquit him of negligent homicide.

“This man was so close to being exonerated from these charges,” he said.

“We tried to piece together this whole scene with all the evidence and there are gaping holes in the puzzle. One of the gaping holes is the investigation by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office,” he said.

“For me, and I think for a lot of people, the Cochise County investigation was absolutely incompetent,” said juror number 26.

Both jurors said some of the errors included neglecting to collect the victim’s gloves at the scene, refusing to collect rocks from the scene and deciding not to conduct gunshot residue testing to determine which hand fired the gun.

Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever pointed out detectives did not have access to Corbett at the scene, and therefore gunshot residue tests would not have produced reliable results.

“Between the time the shooting occurred, he was spirited away and unavailable to us,” Dever said, “clearly some other things could have happened in terms of contamination.”

The two jurors also said some members of the jury felt the video footage of the incident did not match the testimony of the eyewitnesses, who claimed they and Dominguez-Rivera were surrendering when Corbett apprehended them.

“For every piece of evidence, there was reasonable doubt,” said juror number 40.

Both jurors also agreed officials should have decided not to prosecute the case once they realized Dominguez-Rivera had been wearing gloves at the time of the shooting.

“They presumed that clean hands meant there wasn’t a rock,” said juror number 40, adding, “In fairness to Corbett and his family, the state needs to re-examine the case.”

Dever acknowledged mistakes were made during the investigation. He said lessons were learned from this experience and the investigators are now better prepared.

“The investigation was presented to the prosecutor and the prosecutor made the determination that the evidence available was significant enough to take the case to trial,” Dever said. “That is their decision and not ours.”

Corbett also went on trial in February and March, but the judge also declared a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury.

The Herald/Review was unable to interview jurors at the end of the first trial in March. A woman who was a member of the jury in the first trial attended as a spectator a portion of the second trial in October. She declined to comment on the vote when questioned by the Herald/Review.

During a phone interview, Roy Warden, a self-described political activist in Tucson who watches border issues, said the outcome of the second Corbett trial shows there is “a change, a shifting and a hardening” of attitude regarding the country’s open border policy.

“I think the prosecution put on a really good case. It doesn’t mean I believe he should have been convicted. But I believe it would have been easy for that jury to convict him,” said Warden, who spent time protesting illegal immigration outside the courthouse during both of Corbett’s trials, as well as being present in the courtroom for some of the testimony at the most recent trial.

“I believe to get 11 people to rule like they did sends a signal other than the mere facts of the case,” he said. “You can’t ask jurors to remove themselves from the reality of what they see on a daily basis.”

Warden added, “In the first trial, the jury came close to conviction on the exact same evidence. I think between the two trials you can see a change in public mood. I think it would be impossible to ever convict him now.”

In a statement released after the trial, Dominguez-Rivera’s father, Renato, said the family is “disappointed” the jury did not find Corbett guilty.

“We will continue to seek justice for Francisco, and we call on the Cochise County prosecutor’s office to try agent Corbett again,” he stated.

Peter Schey, president of the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, which is representing the victim’s family, also urges the prosecutor to retry the case.

“The killing of Francisco Dominguez Rivera was totally unjustified and inexcusable. The inability of the jury to reach a unanimous decision is disappointing. This incident will hopefully send a message to the United States Border Patrol and its agents that the use of unnecessary deadly force against migrants crossing the border will result in criminal prosecution in the future,” he said in a statement.

“This tragic incident could have been avoided if the U.S. Border Patrol had only exercised greater care and caution in the screening of its recruits and training of its agents,” the statement continues.

Cochise County Attorney Ed Rheinheimer could not be reached for comment regarding whether he will seek prosecution for a third time.

During a phone interview, Corbett’s defense attorney, Sean Chapman, said, “We’re just waiting for him to make a decision on whether he is going to go forward or not, and if he does we will try it again.”

Herald/Review reporter Jonathon Shacat can be reached at 515-4693 or by e-mail at jonathon.shacat@bisbeereview.net.

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Old Marine wrote on Nov 30, 2008 4:54 PM:

    " This old WW2 Marine agrees with 'retired cop' except there are better places to use Marine training. "

    retired cop wrote on Nov 30, 2008 8:38 AM:

    " Agent Corbet should have never been tried in the first place !! He was doing his jod ! Put the Marines on the border and shoot all crossers as they are invading this country and killing our kids with drugs and disease !! Corrupt politicians do not help!!!! "

    SoAzNative wrote on Nov 29, 2008 4:22 PM:

    " Stop spending (wasting) our tax dollars on this case. Corbett is not guilty, 11-1 is not a mistrial. EVERYONE NEEDS TO EMAIL BUSH AND CHENNEY AT THE WHITE HOUSE AND REQUEST THAT RAMOS AND CAMPEON SHOULD BE PARDONED IMMEDIATLY. And why isn't my fence finished already Chertoff?? Enough is Enough. Stay vocal. Giffords was clearly the wrong choice to help us secure our borders, and Obama will want to grnt amnesty within the first year in office. "

    Free Corbett wrote on Nov 27, 2008 3:17 PM:

    " Free Corbett!!
    Free Ramos and Campeon!!
    Thank you to the Border Patrol agents for your service! "

    Winston Smith wrote on Nov 27, 2008 9:50 AM:

    " It doesn't matter who you are or what you have been charged with, 11-1 for aquittal is an aquittal. The Judge is showing his prejudice by ruling a mistrial, which allows the state to try him again "

    lawrence leopold wrote on Nov 26, 2008 10:33 PM:

    " illeagals are illeagals. that's the end of it. He woun't be tried again it's double jeoperdy. the end. "

    For To All wrote on Nov 26, 2008 8:20 AM:

    " If only those who are against Corbett post, your Cochise county prosecutor may see that as everyone wants this case to continue. Public opinion usually does matter. And if he looks at this forum, he'll see that very few feel another minute or another dollar should be wasted on this case. Until the case is dropped, those who believe in Corbett's innocense need to be able to post. "

    To All wrote on Nov 25, 2008 10:12 PM:

    " Furthermore, this trumpted up case doesn't deserve this attention; and that's exactly what Rheinheimer and Woods want you to do - react, react, react, so that they can try it again as a "big issue." What have all the past articles done? Well, it just needs to go away - as it should've about 2 years ago. Support is definately appreciated. But boycotting works too. Nick's a good man and he doesn't deserve this, so I hope you understand. "

    To All wrote on Nov 25, 2008 9:54 PM:

    " Old Marine. Your concerns are understood. There are now 94 messages on this board and truthfully the family and loved ones in this case wish to have some peace for a while. If people keep responding to one another on this board and arguing pretty soon there will be 200 messages. This isn't what anyone closest to the agent desires. If people who dislike the agent want to comment to each other - let them. If you keep responding to them, all it will create is more arguing and more posts - get it? "

    oh really... wrote on Nov 25, 2008 7:16 PM:

    " To those of you who think that Corbett should have been found guilty, consider this: have you ever been in the same situation where you fear for your life? As a military policeman, I have been in that situation, and I can tell you that it is easy to sit back at your desk and crticize those who were forced to make a choice to pull that trigger. If you haven't had to make a life-or-death decision for you or someone else, then you are NOT qualified to say one word about this case. "

    Old Marine wrote on Nov 25, 2008 1:51 PM:

    " "To All": If you feel the way you submitted your comments, why did you comment the way you did on the message board? "

    Gaping holes wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:43 PM:

    " The holes in this case were caused by tow people the sheriff who failed to have competent people do the investigation and the county attorney who admitted he and no one on his staff was capable of doing the job. We pay bothof these people a large salary and they can't do the job. To bad people don't have enough sense to see that and elect people who can. "

    SierraVistan wrote on Nov 25, 2008 11:59 AM:

    " Free Ramos and Compean!
    Free Corbett! "

    Give it a break wrote on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 AM:

    " This is not about Hispanic or white. This is about a terrible job done by the sheriff and county attorney. "

    To All shhhhh... wrote on Nov 24, 2008 1:28 PM:

    " No will not stop posting, for one the newspaper knows we are reading the articles, and two if I see racist comments, I will answer. I cannot stand people who make such careless remarks. I agree with JAS, but cannot overlook the facts. I will continue to make my voice be heard, even if it takes to the white house. Be prepared, a mexican president is coming. How long, sadly who knows. "

    Lee wrote on Nov 24, 2008 10:34 AM:

    " to the county attorney enough is enough! you have tried and failed not once, but twice to convict this man. Stop spending tax payers money for you own vendetta. You are here for the people of cochise county. The people have spoken. "

    Hey To All wrote on Nov 24, 2008 8:32 AM:

    " This issue doesn't go away until Cochise County drops the charges. As long as they let this hang over Corbett's head, everyone is stuck in limbo. "

    To All wrote on Nov 23, 2008 8:10 PM:

    " Let the healing begin now by discontinuing writing on this message board. The more the issue is brought up here or anywhere - the more the agent isn't getting solitude. Please let this arguing subside. Thank you. "

    Free Corbett wrote on Nov 23, 2008 2:25 PM:

    " Mr. Rheinheimer:
    Let the healing begin - NOW.
    It's time to FREE BP Agent Corbett. Two mistrials are clearly enough evidence that there is plenty of "reasonable doubt". In the interest of justice, you must drop the charges. No one but the person who entered the country illegally is ultimately responsible for his own death. "

    JAS wrote on Nov 22, 2008 11:17 PM:

    " The case has been very difficult for all involved - and the issues of the case only reflect back on the greater issue of the U.S. Yes, if Mexican Nationals were not free to cross the border at whim; no one would get hurt or feel a need to protect. Hate and contempt thrown around here on the site isn't going to help either. I feel for both sides; and Mr. Corbett and his loved ones have been through trauma;with all the stuff said over the months on this site - there needs to be healing. "

    Jimmy wrote on Nov 22, 2008 11:01 PM:

    " You go stand guard on the border in the dead of night, by yourself, surrounded by drug running murderers. See how weel you do. The border patrol are heros. "

    Diana wrote on Nov 22, 2008 10:24 PM:

    " I am not related or know any border patrol agents directly, so how dare you To Winston Smith make the assumption that because I think these attempt to prosecute Mr Corbett by our county attorney after the federal government turned the case down means I am related to a Border Patrol agent is pure ignorance on your part. Please do your research, they federal government did not thing this was a case to prosecute (hello, Duh). "

    Kerry wrote on Nov 22, 2008 8:21 PM:

    " He is going to get away with murder. Thanks to our great "investigators" of the Sheriff who was re-elected! "

    County resident wrote on Nov 22, 2008 11:15 AM:

    " To the know it all that wrote to Winston Smith. I commented a few days ago, and I am not a relative nor do I know any Border Patrol agents. I do know that these trials were a farst. The comments seem to be from just ordinary people that are glad to have the Border Patrol doing their job, and being able to see that Corbett was set up by the illegals and the mexican advisors. "

    Aimee wrote on Nov 22, 2008 9:29 AM:

    " This tragic incident could have been avoided by not entering our country illegally. "

    for the To Winston Smith wrote on Nov 22, 2008 8:44 AM:

    " The jurors must have been Border Patrol agents too since you make it sound like they are the only people who support Mr. Corbett on here. The case should be dropped. It was 12-0 on the two most serious counts. If the county had any idea what happened before the trial and presented one charge instead of throwing this Hail Mary of charges, it would be over. Even with a 3rd trial being legal, it would be completely against the American Way to attempt to try the 2 most serious charges after a 12-0 vote on them. "

    To Winston Smith wrote on Nov 21, 2008 11:44 PM:

    " It's not an acquital since 11-1 isn't an acquital - do the math; there were 12 jurors. This IS the United States remember? The one that did not agree was certainly intelligent and has a lot of personal integrity and courage to say the least. I don't know them; but wished I did. This case should not be dropped. Most postive replies here are from border patrol agents and their family and friends. "

    Winston Smith wrote on Nov 21, 2008 9:09 AM:

    " Point still is; How is 11-1 for an aquittal, not an aquittal? By calling it a mistrial the judge has left it open for this officer to be tied again, and again, and again. He was aquitted there is no requirement for a unanymous verdict "

    Fact of Life wrote on Nov 21, 2008 8:13 AM:

    " We elected two incompetent people to jobs they are not qualififed for because to many people didn't care about this situation or the Hager case. An R after someone's name does not mean hey are qualified for the job. This type of malicious prosecution is uncalled for and the ineptness of the investigation goes beyond comprehension. Why do we not have quality people after twelve yrs with our sheriff at the helm? He is not steering this ship in a professional manner. "

    Got it right wrote on Nov 20, 2008 8:44 PM:

    " At least the jury got it right. The Sheriff did not and neither did the county attorney. This cost us a fortune. Why did the FBI get it right so quick and the sheriff's office couldn't? "

    Diana wrote on Nov 20, 2008 8:32 PM:

    " Juror 26, thank you for your service and you ability to see the facts of the case and not be influenced by any outside stimulation either for or against. I admire those people who are willing to vote for what the feel is correct and not be swayed by others. "

    R. Figueroa wrote on Nov 20, 2008 6:16 PM:

    " Anybody ever asked why the other three illegals were returned to Mexico?? Yes, there were 6 illegals arrested by Corbett and only three testified. The other three agreed 100% with Corbett and was not for the best interest to the government of Mexico to have them as star witnesses. That was the first red flag to deduct the whole trial was a scam. My compliments to the Border Patrol union. hopefully you could do the same for Ramos and Compean. "

    R. Figueroa wrote on Nov 20, 2008 6:12 PM:

    " The United States Border Patrol is a professional law enforcement agency. If people is so concerned and angered about the actions of this agent, they should go to the border and patrol along with one of them. I hope you get exposed to the same level of violence and shootings agents are exposed in that war zone. The mexican government is behind this ridiculous attempt to take away the life and liberty of this agent. I dare you all to go to Mexico and throw rocks to the federales, and good luck!! "

    Juror 26 wrote on Nov 20, 2008 4:43 PM:

    " The cowardly thing to do would have been to convict when there was no evidence as to guilt. I believe the reason the brought in Mr. Woods is the county knew they had no case and they needed someone who could put on a big enough show to distract the jury from that fact. The video and the cloths told the story and the story did not match what the prosecution claimed. It is tragic that two families have been wrecked by this event but retribution against an innocent man isn't the solution. "

    PJR wrote on Nov 20, 2008 1:47 PM:

    " Of course it there is going to be reasonable doubt. He didnt wake up and say i think ill shoot an illegal today. What they were supposed to prove was that this illegal made this agent so mad that he killed him out of anger. which is what the evidence suggests. Everything about this case and how the investigation was conducted was incompetent. If you cant do it right the first time, then call it a day. "

    Leon T. wrote on Nov 19, 2008 4:26 PM:

    " How many days does Rheinheimer have to spend on this decision? I mean, he has no case, he's had two shots at trial with his fancy hired prosecution team, and we're going to go for thirds? I am really concerned that he and Dever are in major cover-up mode right now. They were both in over their heads. They're still in over their heads. When you're in deep water and you can't swim, you better head for shore. Dawdling in the deep water becomes more dangerous every moment. Swim for shore boys. You blew it. Swallow it and move on. "

    Independent wrote on Nov 19, 2008 11:14 AM:

    " To Paul Arnold: You wrote fine surcharges were used to pay for the outside prosecution services. You miss the point. These are additional costs. We already pay people to do the job so bringing in a special prosecutor costs additional money and tells me Rheinheimer felt inadequate to the task. Are you like so many others you don't remember it all comes out of citizens pockets? "

    Langer wrote on Nov 19, 2008 8:59 AM:

    " From the SVH newspaper articles I knew that this jury was really doing its job to the best of their ability. The items requested made it clear they wanted to ascertain the true facts of the case rather than to blindly buy the prosecution case. They diligently used magnification and other tools to disprove a snow job. Thank you jury members.
    Agent Corbett needs to be allowed to live what's left of his life that has been severely damaged by an incompetent investigation and apparently incompetent decision to prosecute. "

    I love ignorant people wrote on Nov 18, 2008 6:13 PM:

    " How can somebody not love ignorant people who after reading a couple slanted Herald articles think they are so much better informed than 12 jurors who spent 2 weeks on a case? I only wish I could be as all knowing as they yahoos. "

    Jurors in doubt wrote on Nov 18, 2008 3:10 PM:

    " I doubt, the jurors had any doubt as to the credibility of the evidence. I don't doubt they had pressure to let a killer go free by misusing the legal system. Simply, the Jurors (except one) were a bunch of cowards! Cowards for Corbett. I am sick of it too. But I see change, LOTS OF CHANGE, coming in. So get ready if you don't like justice and change because it is already upon us. Repentance and Justice will return to this land whether some like it or not. "

    To Sick of it wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:20 PM:

    " The reason for the gunshot residue test would be to prove which hand Agent Corbett had his gun in at the time of the shooting. The two different sides presented different testimony on which hand the weapon was in at the time of the shooting. The witnesses say it was his left, Agent Corbett said it was in his right hand. Basically it would be going towards the credibility or unreliability of the witnesses and whose story is more accurate than anything else. "

    Sick of It wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:12 PM:

    " What would a gunshot residue test prove? We already know that Corbett fired his weapon.

    Drop it Rheinheimer. "

    True to myself wrote on Nov 18, 2008 11:17 AM:

    " Well BOBBY, you are right, maybe euro americanos built this coutry but is it theirs, no. I agree with DIANA. We need more thinkers like her. I can't believe so many people were complaining and yet voted the same SO_ back in. I think we need to educate these people who have rcist views and explain to them that what they have is racist views and onces they see they have racist views, we should put on their the license's RACIST. Anyway you people who get that weird feeling if your around a group and people from a different race,JustKnowYouAreTheProblem...! "

    St David Reader wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:47 AM:

    " How many of you truly care about the quality of investigations in our County, or do you just follow the messy political ones? Let's see if the Herald's management can look beyond their "what Dever says must be true" rose glasses. Let's see if they look at all the homicides butchered by poor investigations the last decade under Dever's leadership. Let's see some justice for those 8-10 unsolved homicides since the old man was first elected. These are Americans who died in our county! Too bad someone didn't pursue this storyline before elections. "

    Diana wrote on Nov 18, 2008 8:47 AM:

    " The best way to make sure Ed does not prosecute this case again is to write you county Board of Supervisors and let them know that trying this case again will result in a recall their recall, the Board of Supervisors run the show. Ed and Larry are disgraces to Cochise County, the good old boys back at play.
    Too often in this county we tend to vote for someone familiar, not always the best candidate for the job. "

    To Larry Talbot wrote on Nov 18, 2008 8:28 AM:

    " The reason people are ignoring your comments is because you are incorrect. Felony jury verdicts must be unanimous in the state of Arizona. You may be thinking of civil trials where only three-fourths of the jury needs to agree to settle on a verdict. To my knowledge, the only states that do not require a unanimous verdict in felony cases are Louisiana and Oregon. "

    cal wrote on Nov 17, 2008 11:13 PM:

    " Try throwing a rock at the Police here in New Orleans you'll be dead in a nanno second, yet it's OK on the Border! "

    Leon wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:09 PM:

    " Looks like recall time for these buffoons. I can't believe that "re-trying" this case is even a remote consideration in Ed Rheinheimer's mind. Is he kidding? Is he really that delusional. It always amazes me to see how some of these politicians could care less how much taxpayer money they waste promoting their own fame. This is beyond disgraceful folks. Somebody needs to thoroughly investigate the malfeasance and misappropriation of funds at CCSO and the county attorney's office. Grant Woods and his crew are laughing all the way to the bank. Unreal. "

    Larry Talbot wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:00 PM:

    " Point still is, how is 11-1 for aquittal not an aquittal. There is NO requirement that aquittal be unanimous. The Judge declaring a mistrial is an abuse of authority. "

    Duh wrote on Nov 17, 2008 6:46 PM:

    " Larry Dever had twelve years to have his "Investigators" trained to perform competent investigations. Alas, there ready now! I can't believe the people of this county elected the dimwit again! "

    KB wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:51 PM:

    " Rheinheimer and Dever were certainly not elected by me. I did not vote for either of them in the last two elections. There were 802 write-in votes against Rheinheimer and I suspect that Bradley got many more votes than expected against Dever. The write-in votes were huge and exceeded write-ins in every other category. I think that says quite a bit about the dissatisfation in this county. But no one had the guts to run against Rheinheimer. And that is disgraceful. "

    Bobby wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:29 PM:

    " "True to myself", thinks this is no ones country. I guess he/she thinks it really isn't even those European Americans country whos ancestors built it. Sounds pretty deluded to me. Again, this nation was built by European Americans, and I cannot say otherwise, because it is simply the the historical truth. Now if your'e not interested in the truth, that's another matter and you will have to deal with your demons/lies. What else can a rational person say? "

    Badbob wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:16 PM:

    " You folks elected Dever, and Rheinheimer, What in the world can you be thinking when you cast your ballots? The jurors on this case say, "there was reasonable doubt on every issue in this case." And Rheinmaccher and Dever used your tax dollars to hire expensive high priced idiots. Come on folks.....Let's get back to work protecting our nation. Stop electing incompetent people who are needlessly spending your tax dollars. "

    statb wrote on Nov 17, 2008 4:16 PM:

    " wish I could of been on the jury
    Free as a bird "

    politically incorrect wrote on Nov 17, 2008 3:56 PM:

    " God will make the final determination in this case. Who knows what really happened, I don't, you don't. HE does! "

    guido wrote on Nov 17, 2008 12:57 PM:

    " This tragic incident could have been avoided if MEXICO had only exercised greater care and caution in NOT HANDING OUT PAMPHLETS ON HOW TO BREAK US LAWS and EVADE U.S. BP. Also Woods and Reinheimer are WRONG when they declare Cochise CO residents do not pay for these trials. Cochise county residents pay more than county taxes, we also pay Federal, State as well as local, so COCHISE COUNTY RESIDENTS DO PAY FOR THESE TRIALS IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER. Cochise county residents also pay Dever's salary. "

    lance sjogren wrote on Nov 17, 2008 11:51 AM:

    " Not knowing this case in detail, I can't judge the merits of Schey's claims. What I can say, however, is that the functionally anarchist policies advocated by the likes of Mr. Schey would, if fully adopted, lead to a Police State. It is ironic that people like Schey who consider themselves advocates for social justice would, if they were allowed to prevail, lead our country toward becoming one of the bloodiest dictatorships in the history of mankind. If that happened, I wonder whether Schey and his ilk would recognize the horrors they had caused? "

    Skeptical wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:20 AM:

    " TO: Iris Lynch. Your cliche is equivalent to saying "if he hadn't been driving his car to work, he wouldn't have had an accident." Weak logic that has nothing to do with the Corbett trial. I hope your husband, who says he is an experienced lawyer and judge, uses better logic than yours. "

    Jacqueline OConnor wrote on Nov 17, 2008 10:15 AM:

    " Thanks Iris, you reminded me about the shared responsibility of this event. The four people confronted sure outnumbered Mr. Corbett and I don't believe people brave or desparate enough to undertake this crossing were going to give up and go meekly. I wouldn't. So what happened, or what each thought happened, will never be known definitively. My sympathies go to the family, but my loyalty goes to my protector, Mr. Corbett. No new trial is required unless the Mexican Consulate has more clout with Rheinheimer than I expect. And, again, how much did this special prosecutor cost? "

    True to myself wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:41 AM:

    " I cant believe someone actually posted that giffords and napolitano are th criminals. How goofy is that. Just another racist point of view myself. I bet it was someone who is not Hispanic, African american, or etc. You know what I mean... I also laugh when I see peopleAre saying this would not have happened if they would have stayed in their own country. This is no ones country in my view. The first Americans came and took it away from those before them. I am in my twenty's and cannotImagineHow itIs inTheEastDealingWith Racism. YouWouldThink Az Would BeBetterButJustLookAt ThesePostDISGUSTING!!! "

    To CIVPOL wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:26 AM:

    " It was investigated by a federal agency and the FBI and US Attorney's office determined that no charges should be filed. But the local dimwits decided to just go ahead, based on an obviously one-sided and poor quality investigation. "

    Just opinion wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:19 AM:

    " This shows just how poorly the sheriff's office is being run. The sheriff admitted the case was not investigated right. But he now says they are better prepared. OJT in a homicide investigation is a terrible way to learn anything. hasn't this sheriff been here a long time? Why wsn't the training already provided and proper supervision at the scene? "

    Anonymous Juror wrote on Nov 17, 2008 8:05 AM:

    " Further, the state used her report to decide to try the first time. That report stated that Francisco had clean hands and thus (presumptiously) could not have had a rock. When they discovered their GREAT BLUNDER they should have REPENTED to the community, and people involved and re-wrote the report to reconsider prosecuting. Under magnification the video makes it abundantly clear that they were not in surrender when Corbett approached. STATE, why not show the public a video that magnifies that scene or is it more convenient to leave it panned out, blurry? "

    Anonymous Juror wrote on Nov 17, 2008 7:50 AM:

    " I sat in the trial and Cochise County said if he (Corbett) were there "I would have done Gunshot Residue testing" (GSR). Comment to self "if you WOULD have you SHOULD have!!!!!!" no excuse. That was pathetic, presumptious,lazy work. Murder investigations are not based on CONVENIENCE but based on procedure. Her investigation was to do what was convenient and not to follow procedure. "

    Wake up Arnold wrote on Nov 17, 2008 7:24 AM:

    " So the fine surcharges paid for a half a million dollar fiasco? Those monies could have been used to prosecute real cases. You are against Corbett not talking to the incompetent investigators, yet probaby think it was alright for the illegals to get counsul before they talked to the them. "

    RAD wrote on Nov 17, 2008 6:59 AM:

    " CIVPOL,
    It was investigated by the Feds and they decided there was no wrong doing.
    FBI, OIG, and The Border Patrol's Evidence Team all did investigations and have first access to the Agent, as it should be.
    Cochise County Attorney Ed Rheinheimer and the Sheriff's Office were trying to make a name for themselves. So much for interagency cooperation. Good Job Mr. Rheinheimer "

    CIVPOL wrote on Nov 16, 2008 10:54 PM:

    " Future cases like this involving federal employees, and there will be others in our county, should be investigated by a federal agency. "

    StuBob wrote on Nov 16, 2008 10:49 PM:

    " What a monumental waste of tax money. "

    keone wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:45 PM:

    " Though not their I did read a transcript of the trial. I judge the Investigation as below average. I judge the illegal witnesses as not credible and programed. I view the prodecutor(s) who brought this case to trial as dangerous to good law. If they do it again there should be a outside investigation in the pros/office. Agent Corbett, sorry they did this to you. "

    Diana wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:27 PM:

    " Our county Board of Supervisors need to rein in Cochise County Attorney Ed Rheinheimer. Remember this should have been a federal case and the federal government did not want anything to do with this prosecution, but in an election year County Attorney Ed and Larry Dever decided to prosecute this case. Smell of the good old boys club??? "

    deadzone wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:06 PM:

    " Jurors (and everybody else) can see gaping holes in the border too. Look at these videos of illegal aliens pouring across the border - every day and night.
    www.borderinvasionpics.com
    Incredible. "

    Fat Murphy wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:52 PM:

    " Robert Lynch you are correct on the not guilty. About the BP not allowing CCSO to interrogate, doesnt a lawyer recommend not speaking to law enforcement with out a lawyer present so the lawyer can stop any answers that may help prosecute his client. An investigation can and will be performed by law enforcement without the cooperation of the accused. sounds to me you may be biased towards the BP. Is that the case. "

    WHAT wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:47 PM:

    " Mr. Lynch, you were a poor judge and even worse attorney if you think a suspect is required to talk to law enforcement. Have you ever heard of Miranda Rights? A first year law student knows them by heart. You need to reveiw them. The worst part of this case was poor investigation by the sheriff's department and that has nothing to do with Agent Corbett not talking to them. I wouldn't talk to them either under any circumstance if I was being investigated. They are terrible and the sheriff admitted it. "

    Paul Arnold wrote on Nov 16, 2008 6:39 PM:

    " The Cochise County Attorney is an outstanding attorney and man. The County Attorney office was hamstrung by the BP sequestering Corbett WHO REFUSED TO COOPERATE IN ANY WAY WITH CCSO. The Sheriff has no power to FORCE someone to cooperate. As for the costs of BOTH CORBETT TRIALS, THEY WERE NOT PAID BY COCHISE COUNTY. Fine surcharges paid entire costs. Before people sound off they shpould research the laws of AZ. There are times I firmly convinced our voters are as ignorant as the mobs in Chicago and NYC.
    WAKE UP AZ THE ENEMY IS NAPOLITANO/GIFFORDS! "

    Lynch wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:54 PM:

    " You sound like you want to lynch someone.
    Where did you get the idea that the judges name was Corbett?
    You sure as H. don't sound or write as an attorney, at least not a compentent one. "

    GARY ROSE wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:47 PM:

    " WHY ARE THEY ALLOWED TO TAKE THE CRIMINALS WORD OVER U.S.A. LAW ENFORCEMENT?ARE THEY NOT PATROLLINE QUIET OFTEN? HOW MANY TIMES DOE SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAVE TO HAPPEN?JUST REMEMBER OUR BORDER PATROL ARE THE GOOD GUYS? AN AMERICAN THANKS "

    Marty wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:19 PM:

    " It's time to face the facts he was tried United States Border Patrol and Agent Corbet get back to his duties as a Border Patrol agent protecting our nations border against illegal immigration and to the Agent and his Family im greatful for everything that he has done for our country be protecting our borders. "

    Old Marine wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:14 PM:

    " I've said it before and I will say it again: Those 'illegals' were in our country illegally. The Border Patrol was doing its job. "

    Raymond wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:10 PM:

    " "First, it is time to move on. Corbett has been found Not guilty by 2 I say TWO sets of Jurors of his peers (in so many words NOT GUILTY). Secondly the FBI cleared the shooting PERIOD. The Sheriff and County Attorney need to move on otherwise start answering to the people who elected them into office as being incompetant officals". "By the way common sense is.. put the Agents, Yes Border Patrol Agents need to be on the Border. Not miles inland otherwise you lose control of said border". Truth hurts doesn't it. "

    Trevino wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:56 PM:

    " Look at all the rocks in the picture. And CCSO didn't bother to pick up any of the rocks around the body. Then they left the gloves laying there. Then they testified under oath that the illegal alien couldn't have had a rock because his hands were clean. Then they find out he had gloves on. Then they testify that they "collected" gloves. Then they can't produce any gloves or documentation that they ever had them. Then the defense investigator finds the gloves a year later at the scene. And all Larry Dever can do is deflect blame? "

    Trevino wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:43 PM:

    " Larry Dever would love to blame this on everyone but himself. Notice how he takes ZERO reponsiblity for this garbage investigation. All Dever has done is make CCSO the laughingstock of the law enforcement community. Third graders could have done a better job investigating this. As to Corbett, he is innocent. Time for Rheinheimer to stop purusing his 10 minutes of fame and drop this sham. "

    To Robert Lynch wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:39 PM:

    " You should learn the law. The Miranda Warning gives citizens the right to remain silent. Successful investigations are completed every day when a suspect has chosen to invoke their rights. Was Agent Corbett not allowed to exercise those same rights? "

    Bobby wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:34 PM:

    " The Whitehouse, the Congress , and the Senate are the ones endangering both border patrol agents and illegal aliens, because they will not complete a decent fence, and more importantly they will not enforce existing U.S. immigration laws. Period. American citizens must suffer who do their jobs because of the many traitors we have in office. PERIOD. "

    Robert Lynch wrote on Nov 16, 2008 3:15 PM:

    " "Not guilty" does not mean the Defendant is "innocent." There is no verdict as "innocent."
    Second, the BP would not permit CCSO interrogate Corbett! Some cooperation! To me, as an experienced attorney and judge Corbett's action leave a lot unanswered; however, the jury has spoken and it is over.
    BTW, the CCSO does NOT determine if there will be a prosecution in a case. That determination is made by the County Attorney.
    It is impossible to investigate a case where the accused is sequestered and refuses to cooperate with law enforcement.
    Learn facts/law before case critique! "

    Jacqueline OConnor wrote on Nov 16, 2008 2:34 PM:

    " I'm sorry the young illegal immigrant is dead. I'm sorry our county sheriff's office investigation was inferior and our county attorney needed outside help to prosecute a rather simple (if politically explosive) case. It won't be the last such case in all probability. We can't stop the flow of illegal aliens (don't like the term? Tough.). But we can improve our county officials. Remember this case when these two (Dever and Rheinheimer) dare to file for re-election next time.
    You finally looked beyond your biases, Jonathan. Thanks. "

    Ed Rheinheimer go after Sen. Allen Boyds son-John Boyd human smuggling wrote on Nov 16, 2008 2:12 PM:

    " Mr Rheinheimer, please show Arizona the same fire and go after John Boyd for the 5 illegals smuggling at 3K each, 3 rounds of Crystal Meth, Bertta 22 with extra rounds and 3 knives. He was caught in Willcox in Sept 28th. Oct he was only charged with human smuggling! A 6 year old illegal in the front seat! Child Welfare should be all over this.
    A congressman's son should not get off lightly. If I was caught, I would probally, not see the light of day for a long time! "

    Kathleen wrote on Nov 16, 2008 1:51 PM:

    " We train and mandate our military "shoot to kill" those crossing into Iraq; yet, we prosecute our border patrol for doing the same with those crossing and illegally entering our country at the southern border. The drugs and crimes committed by illegals invading this country are no less lethal to Americans than the WMDs carried by terrorists seeking to harm those in Iraq. "

    Free Corbett wrote on Nov 16, 2008 1:35 PM:

    " Mr. Rheinheimer:
    It's time to FREE BP Agent Corbett. Two mistrials are clearly enough evidence that there is plenty of "reasonable doubt". In the interest of justice, you must drop the charges. No one but the person who entered the country illegally is ultimately responsible for his own death. "

    Hey Roy Warden wrote on Nov 16, 2008 11:59 AM:

    " Maybe the 11 jurors did rule merely on the facts of the case. Perhaps you and the one who voted guilty are the ones who can't put your personal feelings about illegal immigration and the Border Patrol aside and conside soley the shoddy evidence in this case. "

    LoveShelties wrote on Nov 16, 2008 11:10 AM:

    " We've heard from two juries that the county's investigation could not bring them to a quick and easy conviction. Now I'd like to hear exactly how much money these two trials cost our taxpayers. Let it go and use the money to prosecute the drug problems that cause crimes of burglary and murder to happen every day in our communities. Corbett is not a danger to society if left out on the streets. Why are they so stuck on him even after two mistrials? "

    CJB wrote on Nov 16, 2008 10:33 AM:

    " Dever says Corbett was "spirited away and unavailable to us" yet wasn't he at the Border Patrol Station just like the "witnesses"? Why couldn't the "detectives" get the evidence they needed from Corbett then? They interviewed the "witnesses" there didn't they? Officers are not left at the scene of the shooting, ever. Sounds like Dever is covering for his "investigators". Sounds like Rheinheimer is jury shopping. Let the man go NO THIRD TRIAL! We are sick of it!! "

    KB wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:54 AM:

    " It makes absolutely no sense that the county attorney's office dismisses charges left and right after other mistrials, but they continue to hold a grudge against Agent Corbett and the Border Patrol. They are being stubborn and childish in not admitting their mistake in retrying Agent Corbett. They could always blame their failure on the shoddy investigation. Give it up, you big babies. "

    raymond wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:54 AM:

    " I ask Peter Schey, President of the Center for Human Rights, should tell the Mexican Gov. to start training their citizens to start showing greater care and caution when throwing Rocks at Border Patrol agents!
    Mr. Schey what part do you not understand About ILLEGAL entry into the USA, secondly the Illegal immigrate using rocks as deadly force to resist apprehension. "

    the way I read it wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:45 AM:

    " “This tragic incident could have been avoided if the ILLEGAL ALIENS HAD exercised greater care and caution in DECIDING NOT TO CROSS THE BORDER,” the statement continues.
    To me, this is the way the statement should have read! If the ILLEGAL aliens had not been there, no one would have been shot. Hopefully, this is a warning to others trying to cross ILLEGALLY! "

    curious wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:44 AM:

    " Let it go. How many times and how much money will be spent on this trial. A young man trying to gain access to our county illegally is now dead. The man hired and trained by our government to apprehend such people is now ruined. There is no 'Win" in this situation. "

    3 Points wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:05 AM:

    " 1. I must admit, I've been a big critic of the paper for their work on this case, but I thank you for actually doing a piece that doesn't condemn Corbett like most of the others. 2. Sheriff Dever you must push the prosecutor to drop this, you can't admit this was a bad investigation and then try to send a man to prison with it, that's beyond reasonable doubt. 3. Stop suggesting the first trial was a near conviction without some concrete proof. This near conviction appeared out of nowhere with no facts. "

    Torin wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:47 AM:

    " Peter Schey, president of the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, can go live somewhere outside the jurisdiction of the USA if he doesn't like his borders protected. If it was up to me I'd do it like East Germany did with mines, military towers, military patrols, and shoot to kill orders.
    If you want to emigrate then by all means do so but do as my grandparents did and do it legally. "

    Iris Lynch wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:35 AM:

    " As the saying goes, Quit beating a dead horse. Yes, the 'family' would like a conviction which would give them an opportunity to sue for damages. And altho' many have said that mistakes were made, please note that the so-called intruders have not agreed to any responsibility for the incident. In the course of most law-breaking, it is the perpetrators who are at risk for any deaths. But in a case like this why do we absolve the perpetrators of any responsibility? Had they not come here, there would have been no death. "

    Ray wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:32 AM:

    " Congrats to Nicholas Corbett, there is justice in the world. However, people like Peter Schey want to take that away. Ed Rheinheimer, quit wasting taxpayer money and put this one to bed! "

    kcs wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:19 AM:

    " This trial ended in a hung jury because Corbett committed no crime. This trial was a sham from the start and an embarrassment to the prosecutors and Cochise County investigators. The illegal alien and his family are to blame for their sons death, not Agent Corbett. Let the man go, and I hope he sues for malicious prosecution and that will send the message that needs to be sent to these criminal invaders, we are sick of this disrespect for our borders. "

    Larry Talbot wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:00 AM:

    " I'm still at a loss to understand how 11-1 for aquittal is not an aquittal. Since when does Not Guilty require a unanimous vote? "

    Taxpayer wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:33 AM:

    " I wonder if the prosecuters are still paying, for the lavish lifestyle of the illegals kin. "

    I See It Daily wrote on Nov 16, 2008 6:49 AM:

    " For Peter Schey: This tragic incident could have been avoided if the victim and his family had stayed in their own country and applied for legal entry. "

Multimedia



In Tomorrow's Herald


DOING BUSINESS: Locals learning how to seek out government contracts.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement



Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events: