Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


WRITING WRONGS: Words on anomalous gravity in 2008 C.E.


Published/Last Modified on Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 - 02:09:54 pm MST

Commentary by Ken Hooton
Special to the Herald/Review

he calendar calculations in the last two Writing Wrongs columns have brought questions regarding scientific wrongs. Here, anomalous gravity, specifically that found at the Mystery Spot, Santa Cruz, Calif., where tilted and twisted trees abound, is discussed.

Planet Earth is an oblate spheroid — almost a sphere — and is structured like an onion with concentric shells of different materials around a central sphere of metal (liquid iron?) and so is roughly symmetrical. Gravitational attraction of other objects, such as our Moon or a lead weight (plumb bob) suspended on a line (plumb line) just above, or on, Earth’s surface, is on a line through the centers of gravity of Earth and the other object. The plumb line is used to indicate vertical (“straight down”). A plane at right angles to the vertical is horizontal and is a tangent to the Earth’s circular surface at that point. I have a four-foot carpenter’s level that has two tubes partly filled with a liquid so that the bubbles move to the center of their tubes (between two marks) and indicate when the level is on a horizontal plane. Another pair of similar tubes, located at right angles to the first two, indicate when the level is at right angles to the horizontal, i.e. when the level is vertical.

When using a plumb line or carpenter’s level adjacent to mountains, the attraction of the mass of the mountains may deflect the plumb bob (or liquid/bubble) away from the normal or true vertical. Also, if Earth’s concentric shells are deformed or very-dense, or low-density liquid magma intrude near the measuring site, then again deflection may occur. If a dense (iron) meteorite has fallen close to the measuring site, similar deflections may occur. These result in anomalous gravity, where a ‘vertical’ line no longer passes through Earth’s center. The conclusion from all this is that a carpenter’s level only indicates true vertical (gravitational attraction to Earth’s center) or true horizontal (perpendicular to true vertical) when interference from nearby masses is absent. Therefore, straight trees (e.g. pine) grow ‘vertically’ according to local ‘vertical’ conditions.



I visited the Mystery Spot in California thirty-odd years ago. The Spot is about 150 feet in diameter. The trees outside the spot appear to be growing normally, but the trees within the Spot appear to be listing to the northeast at an angle of about 20 degrees to the vertical when compared to trees surrounding the spot. The guide showed us concrete slabs which he assured us were level by laying a carpenter’s level on them. (Aha!). A nearby ‘cabin’ had been built using a similar carpenter’s level. Tourists walking through the cabin or standing on the blocks became discombobulated. The Web site at www.mysteryspot.com still talks of using a carpenter’s level to prove the blocks are truly level and continues to fool the public, either in ignorance or deliberately, by stating that using a regular carpenter’s level within the Mystery Spot shows true level when, as is explained above, it does not. Apparently, the anomalous gravity within the area of the Spot is not uniform because the effects observed vary from point to point, which suggests that intrusion of the magma or shape of the meteorite is far from uniform or asymmetrical.

For descriptions of worldwide gravity anomalies, go to www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/175/gravity_anomalies.html

From time to time, I have pointed out errors in stating dates (years) followed by B.C. (before Christ) or A.D. (anno domini, of the Christian era), the correct method being that B.C. follows the year and A.D. precedes it. For example, 54 B.C. and A.D. 1066 are correct. I noticed a note in a recent issue of Chemical & Engineering News stating that in archaeology, anthropology, history and other fields more politically acceptable terms are being used. These are B.C.E. (before the common era) and C.E. (common era), replacing B.C. and A.D., respectively as in 54 B.C.E. and 1066 C.E.

DR. KEN HOOTON will be happy to receive wretched wrongs from language lovers. Write to Writing Wrongs, Sierra Vista Herald/Bisbee Daily Review, 102 Fab Ave., Sierra Vista AZ 85635, or fax to 459-0120, or e-mail writingwrongs@cox.net. His column appears the third Sunday of the month.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Not PC but Jesus Christ wrote on Nov 13, 2008 6:09 PM:

    " Skeptical, just read the last paragraph above: From time to time,......
    That's where the politically correct crowd would have us use BCE or CE instead of BC or AD. "

    Skeptical wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:14 AM:

    " How in the world do you posters derive from Hooten's discussion of gravity and magnetic deflection from true north the silly religious commentaries? Talk about straying from the point! "

    Expelled wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:56 PM:

    " Questions to Ask Your Biology Teacher about Evolution
    ORIGIN OF LIFE. Why do textbooks claim that the 1953 Miller-Urey experiment shows how life's building blocks may have formed on the early Earth — when conditions on the early Earth were probably nothing like those used in the experiment, and the origin of life remains a mystery?

    DARWIN'S TREE OF LIFE. Why don't textbooks discuss the "Cambrian explosion," in which all major animal groups appear together in the fossil record fully formed instead of branching from a common ancestor — thus contradicting the evolutionary tree of life?
    http://www.arn.org/docs/wells/jw_10questions.htm "

    Expelled wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:50 PM:

    " http://www.arn.org/expelled/ has a great list of articles supporting EXPELLED. "

    Expelled wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:47 PM:

    " Here's the truth of the matter: Before Meyer's paper was published, the pro-Darwin lobby had long-claimed that ID was not science because it wasn’t in peer-reviewed journals. But once ID was undeniably and explicitly supported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal article, Darwinists panicked, and the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) prompted the journal’s publishing society, the Biological Society of Washington (BSW) to attack the paper. The BSW gladly obeyed the NCSE, issuing a statement that Meyer's paper should not have been published because ID allegedly is not science.

    http://www.discovery.org/a/4689 "

    To Expelled wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:47 AM:

    " The video "Expelled" has been thoroughly exposed as dishonest. It's not "intolerance" that leads to that result, it's study. It's easy for ignorant people to say that educated people who disagree with them are intolerant. It's a lot easier than actually getting an education. "

    Expelled wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:44 AM:

    " Recommended: See video "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" starring Ben Stein regarding the intolerance of academia towards anyone challenging the Politically Correct point of view.
    Yes, intolerance such as that exhibited by garbled nonsense, Old time, brainectomy, and prophet. "

    Not PC but Jesus Christ wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:37 AM:

    " Hebrews 1:1 God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, 2 in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.

    So, who created the mountain? or gravity? or LIFE? "

    Not PC but garbled nonsense wrote on Oct 30, 2008 10:41 PM:

    " If you believe your argument, it's very convincing. But, let's face it, it ain't the most convincing argument in the world. Writing like that would get an F in logic. Hows come you are willing to trust your soul to garbled nonsense, when you wouldn't hire a plumber on the basis of an ad written like that? "

    Not PC but Jesus Christ wrote on Oct 29, 2008 6:27 PM:

    " John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. 4 In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men. 5 The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. Genesis 1: 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. So, who created the mountain? or gravity? or LIFE? "

    Cool stuff wrote on Oct 28, 2008 6:58 AM:

    " I didn't know objects on earth could have such an effect on gravity in a relatively small, confined area like that. Thanks for the article! "

    Old time preacher wrote on Oct 26, 2008 6:35 PM:

    " Prophet, you a darn fool. I never read nutin about grabity in my bible. Story an't bout grabity. It's of the devil.What you talking bout? You better stat reading your Bible. And another ting. The sun turn around the Earth, get used to it. We an't dumb. We's smart. You the dumb one. "

    prophet wrote on Oct 26, 2008 9:57 AM:

    " The point, was that gravity and gravitational pull can be offset by large earthly objects in the area. And also a sideline on the dating system. All very interesting and intellegently written. The problem was that he expected anyone here to understand it. Instead of a discussion on gravity we have a few comments on dating, someone calling himself Jesus Crist,telling us that the constitution refers to Jesus Christ. I tell you the truth, you are no different than the Shia's and Sunnis. Apperently, the dumbing down of America is working wonderfully well. "

    Just How Much wrote on Oct 22, 2008 7:58 AM:

    " Just how much can a nearby mountain cause a plumb bob to be off vertical. Is it under 1/1000 of an inch in a 3 foot length? Are the phenomena you're talking about a million times bigger than gravitational anomalies would cause? What, precisely, is your point? "

    Apologetics Press wrote on Oct 22, 2008 7:55 AM:

    " Check out their website, it's a real laugh for anybody who hasn't had a brainectomy. "

    Not PC but Jesus Christ wrote on Oct 21, 2008 7:49 PM:

    " Instead, the Framers chose to utilize the dating method that indicated the worldview they shared. What’s more, their reference to “our Lord” does not refer to a generic deity, nor does it refer even to God the Father. It refers to God the Son—an explicit reference to Jesus Christ. Make no mistake: the Constitution of the United States contains an explicit reference to Jesus Christ—not Allah, Buddha, Muhammad, nor the gods of Hinduism or Native Americans!

    http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2942 "

    Not PC but Jesus Christ wrote on Oct 21, 2008 7:47 PM:

    " If the Framers were interested in being pluralistic, multi-cultural, and politically correct, they would have refrained from using the B.C./A.D. designation. Or they would have used the religionless designations “C.E.,” Common Era, and “B.C.E.,” ... In so doing, they would have avoided offending Jews, atheists, agnostics, and humanists. Or they could have used “A.H.” (anno hegirae—which means “in the year of the Hijrah” and refers to Muhammad’s flight from Mecca in A.D. 622), the date used by Muslims as the commencement date for the Islamic calendar.
    http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2942 "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Jewels of Joy by the Sierra Vista symphony

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality