Opinion : On your mind : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


On your mind


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, Sep 03, 2008 - 05:27:15 am MST

On Your Mind is the Herald/Review’s telephone opinion line and is intended as a public forum for our readers. Comments represent the opinions of callers and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the newspaper or any specific knowledge that we have. Readers may share their opinions by calling 458-0332, or by e-mail to svhoym@transedge.com or regular mail at 102 Fab Ave., Sierra Vista AZ 85635. Due to the volume of submissions, comments will be limited to 150 words or fewer. Comments are edited.




Aug. 25

The Electoral College was not set up for the modern world. It was set up by the framers of our country for a specific reason and the time and day. That’s no longer the case and needs to be abolished. And according to a comment in OYM recently, the Electoral College is not based on the popular vote. They can vote any way they want. They don’t have to vote the way the state says they should.



 

To the Obama voters: How can you vote for a person who just purchased a $1 smillion home in Chicago and has a half-brother in Kenya living in poverty? How can such a person be good for us when he can’t help his own family? Let’s all pray for a McCain win. God bless.

 

Thank you so much to the Herald for bringing back coupons in the Sunday newspaper. Many of us have missed these very much and are very thankful to have them back. Thank you very much.

 

This thank you is a bit overdue. On the evening Buffalo Wild Wings was offering 15 percent of our purchase to go toward the Colt Booster Club, we took our son and his friend after a Buena parent football meeting. While the boys were waiting to purchase our order for take out, a gentleman apologized to them because he felt he “cut” in front of them. He offered to pay the tab of $35 due to his alleged rudeness. The boys said they tried to give the gentleman the cash they had since they didn’t believe he “cut,” but he refused. He asked to use the flier so that 15 percent of his bill would go toward the CBC, too. One of the boys stated he didn’t think nice people still existed, so thanks for placing belief back in our boys and thanks to BWW for supporting the CBC.

My second thank you goes to all the volunteers who supported and made Vegas Night at the Windemere a success and great fun for friends and family of the Buena Booster Club! It was a win-win situation (the public had fun and the booster club made money). The auctioneer was energetic, the music was great, the food was good and I was happy to see teachers and coaches there in support of the event as well. Can’t wait to do it again next year.

I see once again the Border Patrol has put up the worthless checkpoint on Highway 90 north of Whetstone. Once again they pull agents from along the border.

Tonight at the convention site Mrs. Obama delivered a superb speech. I think she should be the Democrat candidate.

It’s been a while since I’ve been in the City Manager’s Conference Room, but did any of you people know that there is no flag of the United States of America in there? At least, that is, from what I remember. And I have made a point of mentioning this to people who I was in contact with in there, and such sentiment and such people seem to be the sort of “stepping-stone,” use-us-for-their-resume people who exist around here, like naming streets after people who don’t live here or naming facilities after people who don’t live here. Do any of you remember that they conduct official “city” proceedings in there, and there is not an American flag in there? You really love your money as long as you don’t have to attend funerals of the roadkill, don’t you, all of you Cheshire cats.

 

Aug. 26

I see that the superintendent of the Sierra Vista public schools is taking lessons from the county supervisors. He has the nerve to say in his letter in today’s newspaper that the secondary rate will decrease from 70 percent per $100 to 66 percent per $100. What he neglects to say is the property values increase will more than offset that. He can forget an override. I voted for it the last time. After the debacle of last year when they couldn’t balance their books and our tax rates went up so bad I will not support an override.

So now the county supervisors want to create a cat tax. Oh, goody. Just because some people cannot control their animals we are all going to have to pay, even those of us who have cats that never leave the house. What’s next, hamster tax? Ferret tax? Or wait, maybe even a bird tax since birds can carry the bird flu. It’s time to stop the ignorance. Do not vote for any of the current county supervisors.

 

Americans are extremely tired of the last eight years of failed policies and division, and we’re all ready for some bipartisanship in Washington. The Great Uniter turned out to be the great divider (or is that the great liar). What we need now is some serious positive change; that will require Republicans and Democrats working together for the common good. John McCain has no strategy for change or uniting our country. His campaign is focused on fear, smear and lies. He is G.W. Bush redux. He has worn out the old POW hero bit. I used to admire him; not any more. He has chosen the low road. And he is way too old, way too rich, and way too lame. Believe it or not, most Americans are either liberal, progressive or moderate and that leaves McCain no place to go but down.

 

If any of our county supervisors vote to treat cats as dogs in a new Animal Control Ordinance they will undoubtedly be committing political suicide for their next terms. Putting cats and dogs as one category of creature is inconceivable for anyone who has ever owned both pets. Their differences are night and day. If thousands of residents who let their cats in and out are forced to keep pets they have had for years of being able to do their natural roaming end up incarcerated into the house for life, there will be unfortunate repercussions for cats and neighbors alike. To say this is fair and to keep rabies under control is ludicrous. It is a combination of additional funds for the county and some pet peeve annoyances of small numbers that is most likely driving the issue. Is it a wonder that no other county in the entire state has any cat control laws?

 

John McCain’s age is no joke. He will turn 72 on Friday and would be halfway to 73 if elected and sworn in on Jan. 20. That would make him the oldest first-term president ever, two years older than Ronald Reagan. He has survived four skin cancers (melanomas), including one in 2000 that was classified as Stage IIa. McCain is two years older than his father was when he died suddenly of a heart attack at 70. He is 11 years older than his grandfather was when he died suddenly of a heart attack at age 61. The U.S. cannot afford the risk that McCain would die suddenly in the middle of an international crisis. Nor can we afford the risk of dementia. Twenty-two percent of Americans over 70 are affected by mild cognitive impairment, while 13 percent over 65 have Alzheimer’s. Ronald Reagan was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s at age 83, but early signs were evident during his first term.

 

I want to say to the public that if they think that John McCain and his corporate friends and his rich circle of friends are going to help out the middle class, small business people, people on Social Security and Medicare, the homeless, and people who have lost their homes, they have got to be insane. History has proven since primitive man to the present that the rich or the “haves” have always suppressed the “have-nots” Myanmar is a prime example, all of Africa, all of South America, Mexico, Russia, China, the Philippines, you name it, all the other countries including the U.S. The rich have always oppressed the poor and the middle class and the have-nots. John McCain is not going to be much better that what George Bush was and history is going to repeat itself. We need a change.

Aug. 27

We need to stop saying the health care crisis is too complicated and too hard for us to solve, that being energy independent is too complicated and too hard for us to solve, that rebuilding our infrastructure is too complicated and too hard for us to solve; we went to the moon for heaven’s sake, we can solve these challenges. But we can’t do these things by cutting taxes on the rich or by saying that gridlock in Washington is a foregone conclusion. We can do them by voting for change in Washington and then holding their feet to the fire until we get the kind of government we deserve.

 

Three days into the DNC convention in Denver, I have not read or seen much to convince me that Barack and Michelle Obama are anything less than nascent left-wing racist revolutionaries, i.e., pro-government control freaks, pro-green/anti-fossil fuel proponents, pro-class warfare, pro universal health care and welfare handout advocates, pro-open borders, pro-entitlement oriented, pro-union, while on the other side of the spectrum they are anti-capital formation, anti-Wall Street, anti-management and if not anti-military they are at best lukewarm toward our military.

 When Gabrielle Giffords says she supports our troops but wants them pulled out of Iraq that is supporting our troops. That’s keeping our people alive because we do not belong in Iraq. To have them pulled out is supporting our troops. We do not belong there. It is not our war.

 

At the DNC Convention, Michelle Obama did her best to portray herself as no longer carrying a “chip on her shoulder” against America. In her speech, she conveniently omitted her previous characterization of the United States of America as a “mean-spirited” country (a quote printed last March in New Yorker magazine). Mrs. Obama has conveniently forgotten that it would have been impossible for her to have achieved on her own what she has managed to accomplish thus far save for the generosity of this country’s democratic and largely generous institutions (private and public) in tandem with the Civil Rights Act and Affirmative Action. Every African-American is so immeasurably better off in terms of life, liberty and the pursuit of opportunity than their African-domiciled forbearers.

On the first night of the DNC convention in Denver, when Michelle Obama mentioned Barack’s decision to eschew a career in New York in favor of becoming an “organizer” on the south side of Chicago, her mention of the words “Wall Street” were coated with contempt. I gather she doesn’t like or understand Wall Street. Yet where would this country be without investors? Wall Street remains the link between creative people with ideas and management skills and investors with the money. Amongst Wall Street’s investors are many rank and file Democrats who have their life savings invested in 401k’s. Millions of Democrats along with Republicans have a stake in the continuation of Wall Street’s health. Businesses and their employees pay   the taxes necessary to support government. Private sector jobs are created only when investors copulate with people who possess ideas and management talents.

Neil Barrett’s bashing of Bob Bland’s Point-Counterpoint stunned me. What blind venom bled through Barrett’s remarks. Bland’s reflection of what Obama must and will do to get this country back on track was clear and inspirational. We should all be thankful to have Obama in line for the presidency. His world view is intelligent and will put the U.S. back into the leadership role it should have, not the bully role it has had.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Joe wrote on Sep 15, 2008 2:11 PM:

    " The economy was mch stronger under Clinton... Proove it... Um okay read the news. nuff said. Regan was a horrible president. He sank us into a recession with his spending with out taxing profile. I am glad he is dead. I wish his republican spending habits were dead too. So today the DOW dropped over 500 points. Some great economy old bushy has at election time. Mortgage crises. I know all right winged facist nuts are in denial and probably foreclosure too. The only people who benefit under Reaganomics is the filthy rich. There are none in SV. "

    hummer wrote on Sep 10, 2008 5:09 PM:

    " To "Hmmmm", you haven't provided us any accurate facts, you are providing us with your opinions or thoughts. The fact is that the dollar was stronger under Reagan then during Carter's term or Clinton's term. The dollar peaked in value against foreign currencies during Reagan's term after taking a significant dive under Carter's term. Big spending during the later part of Reagan's term in Presidency drove the value of the dollar down and it stayed that way during the Clinton Years and Bush years because of big spending. The dollar was strongest during Eisenhower's Republican term in office. http://fx.sauder.ubc.ca/etc/USDpages.pdf "

    To Hmmmm wrote on Sep 10, 2008 12:58 PM:

    " Sure it does, you said, the dollar is ALWAYS weaker under republicans which drives up the price of oil. Prove it! Since you are such an expert on economic matters, How exactly, did Clinton create a stronger economy? Not Greenspan printing more money and creating a tech bubble, but Clinton. Also, how was the dollar weaker during Regan's presidency than Carters? "

    Hmmmm wrote on Sep 9, 2008 8:21 PM:

    " Does it matter if gas was cheaper under Reagan or Carter? Not one bit. Does it matter that it was cheaper under Clinton? Look at the facts... Clinton created a strong economy which led to a strong dollar. Bush weakened the economy and the dollar which drove up the price of gas. This will also be the fate under a McCain regime. McCain is admittedly weak on the economy. He now claims he doesn't listen to his own party yet he voted with them 95% of the time. Vote for where you want our country to go. "

    To Hmmm wrote on Sep 9, 2008 10:43 AM:

    " I am glad that we were able to get your opinion of what’s driving the cost of oil up. The simple fact that gas was cheaper under Regan than Carter means nothing to you I suppose. I am surprised to see an argument on here that isn’t on democratunderground like most on here though. "

    hummer wrote on Sep 8, 2008 8:33 PM:

    " Sounds like Atlanta. We bought a 2 story home with a full basement for $36,000 in 1974. We sold ours for about the same but not until the 1990s. There was a downturn in property values from 1976 - 1982...not that it mattered; we weren't in a rush to sell. It was easier to rent the house out back then. The CPI computation still includes energy and housing today, it just isn't used by the Fed in their reports today as it was back then. They use the PCI or Core Inflation rates...but we've already had that conversation. "

    Billy Hill wrote on Sep 8, 2008 8:02 AM:

    " I wasn't working for the Federal Government then and I lived on the East Coast. I'm not going to expose any more personal info than that here. The house I bought for $35,000 in 1977 sold for $125,000 while but the $20,000 mortgage stayed the same. The CPI then included energy and housing, which it does not now. "

    Hmmm wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:06 AM:

    " The market thrived under Clinton. The only speak of recession is under the bush's. The dollar is always weaker under republicans which drives up the price of oil. "

    hummer wrote on Sep 8, 2008 5:05 AM:

    " Billy, since you say you worked for the Government, I doubt your salary tripled during the Carter Administration. I'm curious to know where you were living at the time, was it San Franscisco? You seem to have a great deal of knowledge about that City. During the Reagan years the Government had the largest increases in pay. 14.3% increase in 1980, 11.2% in 1981 and 7.4% in 1982.
    http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/colaseries.html "

    Billy Hill wrote on Sep 7, 2008 8:09 PM:

    " Hummer, your experience under Carter must have beendifferent than mine. My Salary Tripled. The value of my home quadrupled while my mortgage remained the same. I was able to invest in CDs at 12%. I'd trade the moron we have for him any day "

    Randle Patrick McMurphy wrote on Sep 7, 2008 4:34 PM:

    " You are sooo off. 1) The market is up, even now, far more than it was under Clinton. 2) George H W Bush raised taxes in an effort to work with Democrats who wanted him to do it! 3) Speaking of lies, the idea that is perpetuated that Clinton left us with a surplus in the nation debt or the national deficit (which are two different things) is wrong on both counts. Bush's spending has been horrible and McCain will fix that but the fact is, Clinton left with a $133 billion deficit and $1.4 billion more in debt. "

    Common Sense wrote on Sep 7, 2008 12:35 PM:

    " What you are saying is that McCain hates himself? What an incoherent post. "

    hummer wrote on Sep 7, 2008 11:33 AM:

    " The dollar in recent history took a dive during the Carter term and then peaked in 1984 during the Reagan term, after the economy recovered from Carter's mismanagement of domestic affairs. It then went on a downward trend since then, which can mainly be attributed to our government's inability to keep spending within our current revenue stream. Our debt started spirally out of control during the Carter term and continued through each presidential term there-after. Foreign Oil producing countries decoupled the weak dollar from the price of oil in 2006, which is one reason we are seeing higher oil prices. "

    hummer wrote on Sep 7, 2008 10:49 AM:

    " Yeah, "To common", I remember the stock market taking a dump in 2000 during Clinton's term just like now during Bush's term. I remember Bush Sr promising "No New Taxes". I also remember Clinton promising no higher taxes for the middle class to pay for his programs. Those promised programs included healthcare reform that never happened. Fact is Clinton raised taxes significantly during his term. Clinton raised gas prices by adding 7.5 cents per gallon in gas taxes, and 8.5 cents per gallon in heating oil taxes. Only to spend it all on everything but his promises.
    http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/bill_clinton_promises.htm "

    To common sense wrote on Sep 7, 2008 6:04 AM:

    " Yeah I rememeber how the country was prosperous under Clinton, gas was cheap and the market was up. That was just a horrible period in America... NOT. I do remeber bush saying "NO NEW TAXES" then BUSH RAISED TAXES. Just typical republican lies. Republicans lie and will say anything just like you to try and con people into voting for "McHates the military" Please explain to us why McHater keeps voting aginst veterans benefits? He just hates veterans. "

    Winston Smith wrote on Sep 6, 2008 6:27 PM:

    " Every four years the two major party's insult us by nominating inbred moron aristocrats so that either way we go they remain in power. The only way they will learn is when enouggh people vote third party to influence things. "

    Common Sense wrote on Sep 6, 2008 5:29 PM:

    " Obama claims he will only tax the rich and give a tax cut to the other 95%. What a short memory our naive country has. This lie is the same lie that Bill Clinton gave us on the stump. After he got elected there were major tax increases across the board. With the major big government programs that Obama is suggesting, there is no possible way he will be able to pay for it without raising taxes. I sure hope we are not so stupid as to again believe this lie. "

    hummer wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:14 PM:

    " Continued...continuing down either path as presented by both candidates will not help us in resolving our debt. The legislation that our Democratic Congress passed and our Republican leadership signed to bail out the banks who issued risky loans will put us further in debt. Proposed social programs by Obama will put us further in debt. Illegal aliens are invading and continue to bankrupt our social services, yet none of the candidates have addressed this issue either. We can look forward to more taxes, more illegal aliens, soaring debt, weaker dollar, higher gas prices, soaring inflation. "

    Randle Patrick McMurphy wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:00 PM:

    " I don't need to add anything else. Kerry and many of the Democrats in congress are far richer than McCain. Everybody knows the Democrats don't really care about the little guy. It's just a power grab for liberals to take us one step closer to a Soviet style big government system. I shouldn't have to respond to Socialist/Communist propaganda. Maybe Hmmm would feel more at home in Venezuela. "

    Winston Smith wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:10 AM:

    " Finally I agree with hummer, there is now way out of $9 trillion debt other than printing about $30 trilliion in currency. Tat means your dollar will be worth about 25 cents in ten years. Shaame is the next president will be the one who takes the blame. "

    hummer wrote on Sep 4, 2008 10:36 PM:

    " Both parties are lying, gas prices will continue to go up because none of the candidates have been addressing the real reasons for gas prices going up. Our government, both Democrat and Republican led Congress have authorized uncontrolled spending at record rates. We can look forward to this trend continuing under both candidates to fund the war on terror and new proposed social programs. This debt ensures that our dollar stays weak and ensures we pay more on the market for imports like foreign oil. Any hype of lower taxes is as unrealistic as our debt continues to soar. "

    Not so wise wrote on Sep 4, 2008 10:23 PM:

    " Does the pres raise or lower taxes all by themselves? Does Congress have something to do with the process? So please don't lie about what either candidate will do or won't do. It will be status-quo for whomever is elected to office. Nothing will change no matter what you think ONE person will do or not do. Neither of the candidates will be able to do anything without the Congress and Senate. "

    Arthur Dent wrote on Sep 4, 2008 10:04 PM:

    " At least John C Breckinridge waited until his term as Vice Presindent was over before voting for secession "

    Wise man wrote on Sep 4, 2008 6:33 PM:

    " There are many Republican lies that Obama will raise taxes on everyone. No he won't. He said he will raise taxes on companies and those who make over about $250,000 a year. He will LOWER or FREEZE taxes on the middle and lower classes, and SMALL businesses. he will give tax incentives to companies that create jobs in this country for U.S. citizens. Stop believing the republican lies that are designed to do nothing more than SCARE you into voting for McCain who will make W. Bush's tax breaks for the wealthy permanent. "

    hmmm wrote on Sep 4, 2008 5:33 PM:

    " To "Hmmm" you probably believed the hype when Bush, Sr. promised no new taxes. I've seen some gullible people on here but you definitely lead the way. "

    To Randall Patrick Mcmurphy wrote on Sep 4, 2008 5:13 PM:

    " Don't see you adding anything else to HMMM's remark. You can do better than that. "

    Winston Smith wrote on Sep 4, 2008 1:58 PM:

    " Pauly, Sarah's husband is a hard core Alaska separatist. Just YouTube some of her messages to AIP. Given the opportunity Alaska will become a separate country and take our Oil Reserve with them. You really should get that Karl Rove Syndrome treated so you can express a thought without the mandatory insult "

    What are you thinking wrote on Sep 4, 2008 8:05 AM:

    " To hmmmm, did you do any critical thinking or are you just latching ontto the Obama hype of no taxes for low income seniors? I think you should do some research and some critical thinking about what all the candidates are promising and reflect on what past elected presidents have promised and did not provide. Maybe afterwards you won't make such sort sighted comments. I do no feel we should blindly follow/believe everything we hear or see until we have time to think about it and figure out if it is on the up and up. "

    Pauly wrote on Sep 4, 2008 8:00 AM:

    " Winston you have obviously lost all common sense. Ron Paul knows what? Sarah will do what? What planet do you live on? "

    To Hmmm wrote on Sep 4, 2008 7:58 AM:

    " No not rich, just making the point nothing will change no matter who is elected. Just commented that taxes will not change, only what or who will be taxed. Where do you think the tax revenue will come from if low/fixed income seniors get a free ride? More of the population are becoming old. I did not attack your messiah Obama or McCain. Reread the post and try to understand my point then make an intelligent comment. Some people are sure quick to defend when it is not needed. "

    Randle Patrick McMurphy wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:31 PM:

    " McCain an athiest? Nice try. "

    OBAMA WILL RAISE TAXES wrote on Sep 3, 2008 5:37 PM:

    " To "Hmmm" Obama will raise taxes for all. To include those Seniors. "

    Winston Smith wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:47 PM:

    " There's a good point, the President does not rule by edict. The only one who seems to have a clue on what the President is supposed to do is Ron Paul.
    I'll vote for the one who says he'll nothing "

    Tim wrote on Sep 3, 2008 12:46 PM:

    " For those of you that believe Obama is going to ride into town and CHANGE things for the better, you are buying into the hoax. Nobody from Obama's camp, including Obama himself, can point to one achievement, to one instance of reaching across to the other party in the best interests of the country. It is all hype. By the way, the DEMS have run congress for the past two years, and their stunning accomplishments are??? Get real. "

    Hmmm wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:10 AM:

    " McCain is an athiest so why would anyone pray for him? McCain owns millions of dollars in homes, yet he lets the people in his own state suffer. Then he turns on the military and veterans and tells them they can't have healthcare benefits they served their nation for. God Bless Obama who supports the military and the veterans in deed! "

    Winston Smith wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:05 AM:

    " Sarah Palin's Alaskan seperatist ties represent more of a threat to this country's oil supply than anything going on in the world today. If given thee power she would rubber stamp an Independent Alaska, for and about the Oil Companies. "

    Diana wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:06 AM:

    " In my opinion,our Country is on the verge of change and not for the good. If McCain or Obama become president, we as a nation are doomed.Vote for a 3rd candidate. No matter who it is. Do not let them change America into a socialistic one.Big business and corrupt people have given McCain/Obama the lead. Not the American people. Do not be sheep waiting to be slaughtered. Listen and listen well to the issues. Not the clamor of elitism groups and their empty speeches.. "

    Hmmm wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:00 AM:

    " No change? I would call no paying of income taxes for seniors making less than $50,000 a year under Obama as a huge change. Maybe you make so much money that it won't affect you, but for our seniors it will have a tremendous impact. Maybe your title should read no changes for me because I am rich. "

    No change either way wrote on Sep 3, 2008 7:30 AM:

    " There won't be much of a change in taxes regardless of who is elected. The only change will be what the tax is called or where it occurs. So don't think either candidate will reduce taxes. They won't it will only appear as if they have because of how it is referred to. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Buena robotics team will put $10,000 donation to good use.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality