Opinion : Drinking age should stay 21 : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Drinking age should stay 21


Published/Last Modified on Friday, Aug 22, 2008 - 05:34:00 am MST

Would lowering the age limit for drinking alcohol from 21 to 18 help curtail binge drinking that’s become prevalent in colleges and universities?

About 100 college and university presidents, of which the presidents of Arizona’s are not listed, are pushing for just that, hoping to get states to consider lowering the drinking age to 18.

The question being raised is one that has become almost an age-old generational question in the United States.

The drinking age of 21 was set when Congress approved it and President Ronald Reagan signed it into law in 1984. The idea was an effort to try and improve safety.



That, according to Mothers Against Drunk Driving and federal agencies, is just what occurred.

According to MADD, between 1982 and 1998 there were 61 percent fewer drinking drivers involved in fatal crashes under the age of 21 and a 56 percent decrease among 21- to 24-year-olds.

MADD also cites studies that have found that teenagers have slowed their alcohol consumption rate at a young age.

“In 2003, the Centers for Disease Control looked at 49 high-quality peer-reviewed studies of the effects of changing the minimum drinking age law. Almost every study found that increasing the minimum drinking age to 21 saved lives (an average decrease of 16 percent) and that lowering the drinking age to 18 or 19 caused an average increase in crashes of 8 to 10 percent,” according to the MADD Web site.

Does that mean alcohol use has stopped altogether? No. And it doesn’t mean that by raising the age limit for drinking that it’s made the problem go away.

We don’t believe the issue of underage drinking will ever go away.

The reason the college presidents are making their stand is based on the recent binge drinking reports, ones that come from their own campuses. Binge drinking is when someone drinks heavily in one sitting, but may only be an occasional drinker.

There is a safety issue, not only for those on the road, but also for those who are drinking. There is brain development and other physical growth in young adults.

And while many other nations around the world allow people 18 and younger to drink, would that fit the United States. The question becomes one of culture and habit.

When you add these questions up, does that mean that lowering the age limit to allow drinking is the right thing to do?

We’re not convinced. There’s too much evidence that increasing the legal drinking age to 21 has helped reduce the number of traffic fatalities and related driving offenses. There are more than 20 years of studies to show it.

As for the matter that teenage drinking will always occur, that’s likely a fact. It’s never going to stop. But we raise the question of whether lowering the drinking age may provide more alcohol for high school parties because friends who were 18 could be the suppliers.

And, in our final thought, it’s about the health of maturing young people. Alcohol is the most abused drug in this age bracket. By lowering the age to 18, we fear it would become more widely circulated. That would cause an increase in health problems, and it could make community streets around the nation more dangerous.

Now isn’t the time to change the drinking age. We think the college presidents should be looking for better ways to change how youth are educated about drugs and alcohol throughout the United States. They also could look at how home life impacts the kids who do drink heavily in college.

They would find better solutions there.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    hmm... wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:58 AM:

    " I'll go ahead and disagree with those out there that seem to think that drinking alchohol should be deemed as a right at the age of 18. First off, it's not. It's a privilage to all those over the legal age of 21 set by the federal government. Sure in some countries, it's actually the norm to have the drinking age at 18... that's because they've been doing it for much longer than we've actually been a country. I don't think we as a whole are ready to take responsibility for those actions just yet. "

    Brian wrote on Aug 27, 2008 8:24 AM:

    " For the other side of this topic, read this editorial from my hometown newspaper: http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20080823/OPINION01/30009/-1/opinion/Drinking+age

    The lack of clear reasons to lower the age is remarkable. "

    Independent wrote on Aug 25, 2008 11:15 PM:

    " If these kids can vote, they should be able to (legally) drink. If parents can't do something to teach restraint in 18 years, these kids are beyond any other persons control. For DUI, I'd cut off the right hand of the drunk driver and let the drunk driver be a walkin', talkin, reminder of what the dangers of drunk driving are. Ya-hoo! "

    Point is wrote on Aug 25, 2008 3:02 PM:

    " Sounds just like all the people who think it isn't hurting America for them to shop at WALMART because they are saving money. When you limit some people rights as citizens you allow the government the opportunity to limit other groups or anyone they want. " The government that can give you everything you want has the power to take everything you have" Barry Goldwater "

    Hmm wrote on Aug 25, 2008 2:09 PM:

    " To: "The Party will go on..." You're absolutely right! Law breakers will always break laws no matter what they are. There will always be people who do whatever they feel like doing whether it is legal or not. Should we do away with speed limits because people speed? How about murder? It happens everyday and it is agains the law. Good laws provide benefit those with wisdom and self-control. A fool can't be restrained by anyone but himself. "

    Just a thought wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:47 PM:

    " I went to a Sidewinders game on dollar beer night. Even at 21 people there behaved like idiots. Raise the age to 30 where most people really start to act grow up. Kids moving away from home for the first time AND being expected to be able to drink responsibility is ridiculous! At least in the military the "kids" are trained and supervised in their use of weapons. That doesn't occur with drinking. To "The party will go on...": to follow your logic, we can't have any laws that people would break. "

    The party will go on... wrote on Aug 24, 2008 5:13 PM:

    " Give me a break! Just because you keep the limit @ 21 does not meant there not going to get alchol and to think that will decrease the incidenct of underage drinking!! How naive are you? I know will focus on education on alchol and drugs in the colleges that will help. Have you ever been to college?! NObody will listen. The party will happen weather your 21 or not. "

    Arthur Dent wrote on Aug 24, 2008 8:59 AM:

    " I too am over 60, I was making a point, age is not a basis to deny some citizens the same rights as others. If they want to deny them the right to drink until they are 21, then don't let them vote or serve thier country until they are 21. You are either a Citizen or you are not. "

    Rick wrote on Aug 23, 2008 3:05 PM:

    " Wait... hold on... is the argument being made that our service members 18-20 year-old service members aren't responsible and mature enough to drink? They can't make an adult decision about alcohol but they can carry a weapon into combat? I think some of you aren't lending enough credence to the ability of our young adults to make mature decisions. "

    simplyme wrote on Aug 23, 2008 9:39 AM:

    " Arthur Dent, if I met you, I would have a great reaction time is. If you can't drive how will you get around? I am sure you are in the "older" category. Billy Hill, I agree. I would like to know....if a child has an "adult" mind at 12, why can't they buy booze at 19? Just set those sentences for violations very high-not just where driving is involved. I think there more important issues than drinking age. I recall the local age limit didn't apply on post since it is a federal installation. "

    Arthur Dent wrote on Aug 22, 2008 4:12 PM:

    " Older people don't have the reaction time they used to have, perhaps we shouldn't let anyone over 60 drive. "

    Billy Hill wrote on Aug 22, 2008 4:08 PM:

    " Concerned, there are a lot of people who aren't responsible enough to drink. If we can single out CITIZENS who are under 21, perhaps we couls say Jews are not responsible enough to drink, or blacks, or women. Perhaps anyone who has not served in the Military.
    You are declaring people guilty because of thier age. If they can vote they can drink. Raise the voting age to 21. "

    Arthur Dent wrote on Aug 22, 2008 1:41 PM:

    " All citizens are equal except some, who are less equal? "

    Doesnt Really Matter wrote on Aug 22, 2008 1:28 PM:

    " except for active duty soldiers, who should be allowed to drink at 18. It's not fair that they are old enough to die for this country, but not have a beer with their comrades. Maybe drinking at 18 should be legal on military bases with a valid active duty service member card. The rest of the dumb teenagers in this town who are already drinking underage (even age 18) will continue to do so. Nothing will change that crowd. "

    Auld Sweat wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:52 AM:

    " Billy Hill, this ain't about soldiers, its about maturity and decision making. You should also check out the current military culture where excessive drinking (especially with a drink related violation) is the end of a career and a quick ticket out of uniform. The world has changed. There is much more that could be said, but the issues here are avoidance of liability issues and concerns by universities and the question of when are young people mature enough to make good decisions. In this case, when are they more likely to make wise decisions about drinking. "

    Concerned Citizen wrote on Aug 22, 2008 9:15 AM:

    " To Billy Hill: Just because you serve in the military doesnt mean you are responsible enough to drink. Many that serve in the military are still immature and do not have enough sense on how to handle drinking. "

    Leonidas wrote on Aug 22, 2008 8:36 AM:

    " If the Sierra Vista Herald staff were required to make no advocacy of the expansion of government power at any level, what would they write about? "

    Billy Hill wrote on Aug 22, 2008 7:46 AM:

    " The 21 year old limit tells those brave soldiers defending our country that they are not full citizens. At 21 I was married had children and was on my second tour in Vietnam. You can rest assured I had a US Army Liqour Ration Book from the time I was 19. Where do we get off making second class citizens out of our soldiers "

    Laura W wrote on Aug 22, 2008 7:35 AM:

    " I do believe we should drop the drinking age; however, it should be dropped to 19 or 20. I am from the last group that had the drinking age at 19 before it was raised in 1984(?). Drinking age of 21 is a bit high for an adult. "

    Pauly wrote on Aug 22, 2008 7:14 AM:

    " If you're old enough to vote and join the military then you should be old enough to drink. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Borderland Electric Vehicle Association talks about transportation and energy.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality