Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


State lab fee too much says police chief

By Julie Ann Marra
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, Aug 07, 2008 - 05:35:36 am MST

SIERRA VISTA — The city’s police chief is asking the Arizona Department of Public Safety to reconsider its plan to charge fees for its crime lab services.

Sierra Vista Police Chief Ken Kimmel sent a letter to DPS Director Roger Vanderpool Monday asking him to reconsider this policy, which is the result of a $7.8 million budget cut as a result of a last-minute effort by the state Legislature to pass a balanced budget.

The lab provides services for sheriff’s offices and police departments statewide.

To help make up the deficit, lawmakers indicated that DPS may change fees for its services. It’s a proposal the DPS is considering.


Sierra Vista Police Chief Ken Kimmel


That’s not good for cities and towns that have already passed their budgets for the year.

“For years, the Arizona Department of Public Safety crime lab has done an outstanding job with short staffs and funds for sheriff offices and police departments across the state,” Kimmel said.

With the proposals DPS has made, Kimmel feels the proposed changes made will negatively impact the department, the city and its residents.

One idea proposed by the DPS is to charge departments and agencies a flat fee based on how often they used the lab’s services in the last year. Kimmel said the Sierra Vista Police Department sent approximately 833 cases to the crime lab. Those services totaled $353,350.61. DPS is asking the department to pay $196,928.91 to continue using those services.

Kimmel said that amount is approximately 28 percent of the department’s fiscal 2008-09 budget for police operations and maintenance, which is $697,569.

“This is a significant financial impact and is compounded by the fact that our citizens would in substance be taxed twice for this one service,” the police chief said in his letter to the DPS director.

Residents would be taxed at the state level and the city level to help pay for the crime lab’s services.

Kimmel said he did not know who made the decision to cut the funds, but said he’s disappointed. Police chiefs and sheriffs were not asked for input in the decision or given enough notice to try and raise the necessary funds. In addition, Arizona would be the only other state in the nation to charge agencies for the crime lab services.

In 1988, Mississippi statutorily imposed a fee on users of its forensic services. The Mississippi Association of Chiefs of Police has been working for the past two years to repeal the law because it feels it is not feasible.

The proposed idea also could lead to police officers having to choose what cases to send to the lab for analysis.

“How much money are you going to invest for this criminal case?” Kimmel said is the question it comes to.

Kimmel said they had DNA run in recent burglary case, and the results cleared 10 other cases. If it comes to picking and choosing cases, more could go unsolved.

“When you’re a victim, you’re a victim. It doesn’t matter if we think it’s significant. It’s significant to the victim,” Kimmel said.

The Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police, Sheriff’s Association and the League of Arizona Cities and Towns have all voiced opposition to the plan, Kimmel said. The league is considering hiring a constitutional attorney to determine if the plan is legal.

Should the plan go through, Kimmel said police may look into alternative lab services such as private labs or larger departments’ labs.

“If all of the police agencies impacted by the proposed fee policy found alternative lab services, this assessment would not supplant the intended funds necessary to keep the State lab in operation,” Kimmel’s letter stated.

Pennie Gillette, deputy director with the DPS, said the department in still in the process of finalizing the plan to recoup the funds lost when its new budget goes into effect at the end of September. Two other options the department has looked into are pooling Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations, or RICO, funds or charging for its services on case-by-case basis.

Gillette said the department is trying to minimize the impact on its users and realizes the economic downturn the state has experienced, which has led to a loss of income for government agencies.

“We’re working to still provide service and make the impact to agencies as painless as possible,” she said.

Herald/Review reporter Julie Ann Marra can be reached at 515-4680 or by e-mail at julieann.marra@svherald.com.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    To Retired wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:11 PM:

    " If you think that toothy smiling Kimmel is doing such a good job, you must be an open border advocate, as Kimmel doesn't require his officers to ask the nationality of people they come in contact with. "

    Retired Police Chief wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:49 AM:

    " To Wow and No Diff. The next time you need emergency help call the ACLU and forget about 911. "

    Realist wrote on Aug 8, 2008 6:31 AM:

    " “Wow” & “No Diff” sound like a couple of pawn shop owners that received a few too many tickets for their reckless driving habits. Let me give you a little hint, traffic enforcement reduces accidents thus reducing your insurance premiums. Controls on establishments that offer quick cash for items reduces places for individuals that commit thefts and burglaries to “Pawn” their stolen goods. Lab reports provide leads that help solve crime. Wake up and smell the coffee. "

    mike wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:09 PM:

    " Why people think the police "waste money on useless things" is beyond me. If you really think that, report to your city council. Otherwise, whether you understand it or not, the police know what they're doing and work hard to stretch their bucks. "

    Arthur Dent wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:50 PM:

    " That's why he makes the big bucks, you and the other chiefs get together and handle this. "

    I support the SVPD wrote on Aug 7, 2008 4:30 PM:

    " I can't understand why everybody is so down on the Police Department. They do a wonderful job. Instead of complaining about them why don't you join the force and see if you can do a better job. These people put their lives on the line every single day for US, all I see from you complaining posters is complain. I just hope that you are never in need of the service of the SVPD because all you would do is whine about them. "

    wow wrote on Aug 7, 2008 12:19 PM:

    " I agree with "No Diff", maybe if they stopped wasting all their money on useless things, they would have more for the labs. Why should the residents pay for the mislead actions the svpd does. "

    t wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:31 AM:

    " People will complain about the Police "focus". But they fail to recognize that Police have to be proactive and reactive. Maybe that pawn shop has goods stolen when your home was burglarized and that tailgater just might rear-end you at the next stop light. Then you would blame the cops for not taking care of the problem before it occurred. Let the Police do their jobs and let them solve crimes without having to pay a fortune for lab fees.Those fees will affect how many items are sent up for verification and how many criminals are prosecuted. "

    Terry wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:56 AM:

    " If anyone really thinks there is no need for crime lab services, they are truly mistaken. It seems that so many people complain about a very small aspect of what the Police Dept does; maybe they should take the time to educate themselves about what the SV Police really do daily then just making assumptions based upon what the herald prints. I know several current and former Officers and they are truly professional trying to keep our community safe for everyone. Thanks SV Police for your dedication and service. "

    No Diff wrote on Aug 7, 2008 5:52 AM:

    " With the police focusing on tailgaters, and pawn shops, there isn't much of a need for crime lab services. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Easier said: Columnist Pat Wick on why ‘hands off’ is best policy with wildlife.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality