News : Southwest Gas seeks higher fee from city : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Southwest Gas seeks higher fee from city

Last franchise agreement was approved in 1982

By Julie Ann Marra
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, Aug 05, 2008 - 05:36:08 am MST

SIERRA VISTA — Voters could determine this November if a franchise agreement between the city and Southwest Gas Corp. will be renewed.

City Clerk Jill Adams said at Monday’s City Council work session that all franchise agreements have to be approved by the majority of the city’s voters.

Council members will vote whether to place the initiative on the ballot. This action most likely would occur at the City Council’s second meeting in August.

Adams said the biggest change in the revised franchise agreement involves the franchise fee Southwest Gas pays to the city to use the city’s right of way to accommodate the company’s infrastructure.



In 1982, when the agreement was last voted on, the fee was set at 2 percent. The agreement expired in 2007.

After looking at the market and agreements in other communities, a 2 percent increase will be applied to bring the total up to 4 percent.

Also, in recent years, Southwest Gas has begun adding a 1 percent fee for relocation of lines.

“It’s a 1 percent fee, but what it does is it allows the customers in Sierra Vista to avoid relocation costs in other parts of our service territory,” Southwest Gas representative Dave Naugle said.

The funds collected from this 1 percent fee will only be used for relocation of lines in Sierra Vista. If, at the end of the year, the funds are not used, they will go into the city’s general fund for its use.

This practice helps Southwest Gas avoid raising its rates across a large geographical territory. Thus, Sierra Vista customers will not pay for relocation costs in other service areas such as Phoenix.

Essentially, customers will see a 3 percent increase on their bills under taxes and fees, bringing the total franchise fee to 5 percent.

Naugle said similar agreements with a rate of 5 percent have passed in all other cities with which they have renegotiated.

The proposed agreement will be published in the newspaper for 30 days prior to the election. Naugle also said Southwest Gas plans to visit community groups to explain the agreement. Furthermore, the information will appear in voter materials and pamphlets.

However, on the actual ballot in November, the question will be yes or no on whether to renew the agreement. It will not mention the rate increase that customers would pay.

If the initiative does not pass, the current rate will remain in effect until the utility and the city can renegotiate terms, because there is no current contract.

Herald/Review reporter Julie Ann Marra can be reached at 515-4680 or by e-mail at julieann.marra@svherald.com.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    what a confusing article wrote on Aug 6, 2008 10:18 PM:

    " For most of us who don't understand these fees, this article is very confusing. As presented I can't tell who's initiating the 2% increase (in particular, the 5th paragraph is vague). Apparently the city wants to collect more money for the use of its ROW. If so, what does the city plan to do with this additional tax revnue? (Yes that's what it is!) Finally, why do lines need to be relocated to begin with? "

    Brian wrote on Aug 5, 2008 11:26 AM:

    " If the funds collected from the taxpayers aren't used for what they were collected for the CITY get the money??? That money ought to be returned to the taxpayers. Another way government schemes money from it's citizens. And we don't get to a say on the amount the new rate will be? The city just wants us to give them a blank check? And they'll probly get it since few if any see a problem. "

    Jay wrote on Aug 5, 2008 10:17 AM:

    " Smells like old fish, to me. The gas company is controlled by the State's Corporation Commission. Fees are set there. They shouldn't be allowed to "share" in fees the City charges for the right to do business here. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Eat to compete: Olympians aren’t the only ones who need good nutrition.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality