Opinion : INDEPENDENT VIEW: Lawyers and our civil legal system : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


INDEPENDENT VIEW: Lawyers and our civil legal system


Published/Last Modified on Sunday, Jul 20, 2008 - 05:18:34 am MST

Commentary by Dave Cartun
Special to the Herald/Review

There are four important areas of change needed in our civil legal system: conduct of lawyers and judges, speed of justice, tort reform, and more arbitration/mediation.

The United States has 80 percent of the world’s lawyers and 6 percent of the population.

Why? And what should that tell us about ourselves?



The outward symptoms: call 1-800-lawyers, the tough or compassionate faces staring at you from TV and billboards, and shortages of doctors.

The internal root cause is a legal system acting as a closed fraternity. Lawyers become judges, lawyers judge judges, and judges favor lawyers over users and make laws in place of the people.

Fraternity members are the players, referees and protest committee and control entry fees, rules, process and speed while perpetuating their financial rewards.

Lawyers file class-action lawsuits in certain geographic areas of the country known for granting large cash awards. Even when the award is set aside upon appeal, the lawyer gets publicity and the sleazy clients keep rolling in.

Lawyers promote a litigious attitude through advertising and drive up the cost of goods and services. They file nuisance suits purely for income knowing that deep pockets may not want to spend the time and costs to acquire justice.

One example was the litigant in Nebraska who pulled a Hobart meat slicer, which was missing the thumb guard, from a landfill and cut off half his thumb. His lawyer should have been thrown to the wolves and the permitting judge removed from the bench.

In Europe and Japan, suing doctors is almost unheard of and malpractice insurance cost is negligible.

A person navigating the halls of justice is at the mercy of the fraternity since it does not deal justice a hand in timely fashion. Courts are backlogged. Lawyers request extensions because they’re too busy, and judges grant delays.

Clients should be provided contract agreements protecting their right to efficiency, timely disposition and financial damages from the lawyer if the lawyer does not act in a timely manner and best interests of the client. Those results should lead to censure and possibly malpractice damages and disbarment, the same treatment lawyers dish out to doctors.

But how do you embed that in a system where the fraternity polices itself?

And how long would it take since the fraternity has insulated itself politically and professionally from outside review?

Tort reform is the most immediate need. We cannot continue raising the costs of goods, services and medical care while putting America at a competitive disadvantage with the world. But ask any tort or trial lawyer if he or she cares.

Life is a risk every day. We are not entitled to blame doctors for our genetic make-up, physical fitness, lifestyle, or their attempts to improve our health, save our life or deliver our baby. It’s impossible for doctors to be perfect and overcome every unknown, every time, that may arise during treatment, surgery or delivery. A patient should be entitled to damages only due to gross negligence or total incompetence on the doctor’s part.

Ridiculous settlements arising out of everyday, normal risks have created two factors that threaten our health care: doctors must give unneeded, costly tests just to cover themselves and are leaving their speciality or business entirely due to malpractice insurance costs.

Also, we may never consider the total impact of malpractice suit investigations on a doctor’s current practice or family life.

Cochise County is unique to the state in that its arbitrators and mediators are trained through the Superior Court for the Alternative Court Resolution Program. This court diversion program needs a higher utilization because it offers better service, timeliness and lower costs to the parties involved.

In arbitration, parties present evidence and exchange information. The arbitrator makes the decision. A mediator is a facilitator helping the two parties examine their grievances, reach an agreement and translate it into a contract outlining the what, when, where, how and consideration of the final agreement.

In arbitration/mediation, both parties avoid lawyers, contribute to the resolution, achieve a sense of accomplishment and avoid the winner-loser result of court.

Conclusions. Break up the fraternity. Stop lawyer advertising. Make judges and lawyers adhere to timely schedules or be punished. Give judges the power to discipline lawyers who ask for delays due to too numerous a caseload.

Punish trial lawyers who file nuisance lawsuits. Challenge the jury tort reward system by installing financial caps as part of health reform. Raise the maximum dollar limits so most civil actions go to arbitration or mediation first.

Lawyers earn their bad reputation, but they perform a service that is occasionally needed.

Remember, if you really need a lawyer, get one with one hand. Then he can’t say, “On the other hand …”

DAVE CARTUN is a Bisbee resident who has been involved with pro baseball, volunteer coaching, has served on the Bisbee City Council and is a business entrepreneur. He is a registered independent. Look for the Independent View once a month in the Herald/Review.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    gtown wrote on Aug 22, 2008 1:05 PM:

    " Tort reform is a term tossed around by many. Tell me sir, how should AZ tort law be reformed and why? You spout off about things you know nothing about. Everything you request in your article is already in place: Judges can sanction attorneys, there are time limitations set for trial procedures, and frivolous law suits are already prohibited and sanctionable. Your grasp on medical malpractice is very loose, at best. If you think lawyers are an unpenetrable fraternity, try getting a fellow doctor to testify against another to prove negligence. "

    user wrote on Aug 22, 2008 8:27 AM:

    " this is perhaps the most ignorant rant ever written. Try learning something about the "system" before publishing an opinion regarding the profession you obviously know nothing about. "

    MAG wrote on Aug 8, 2008 1:32 PM:

    " I believe there should be a second jury poll on a case that the defendant wins, whether or not it was a frivolous suit. If it was determined to be frivolous then the lawyer would be liable for all court costs, not the litigant. You would then see an instantaneous drop in all these nut case law suits. "

    Winston Smith wrote on Jul 25, 2008 8:14 AM:

    " In my many years I have been betrayed by most of the lawyers I employed. They each thought thier better intrests better served by the Insurnce Company or Government Entity I was at odd with. On a couple of cases I found that the Lawyer knew less about the subject matter than I did. If there isn't a pot of gold at the end of that rainbow don't hire a lawyer to get you there "

    Skeptical wrote on Jul 23, 2008 7:27 AM:

    " No problem, Lee. All he has to do is start an "organized community" commission in Bisbee, learn to read some inspiring words on speeches written by speech-writers (while posing for cameras with an uplifted air of "I'm the one we've been waiting for") and voila! He would step up to the presidential plate PDQ without the Dems' opposition. After all, unlike a certain "presumptive nominee" who prematurely acts like he's already president while visiting some of our global neighbors, Dave has a real track record with a sound, detailed plan. "

    Lee Rosen wrote on Jul 22, 2008 7:20 AM:

    " OUTSTANDING!!! Please make this man run for President. He far exceeds anyone in politics today!!! "

    Witness to History wrote on Jul 21, 2008 8:55 PM:

    " I can't resist - (well, someone else would say it if I don't) What do you call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? A good start! Starting with the one who handled my first divorce! Seriously, though - I enjoyed the article. I'm gonna save it for blogging use, if that's ok. "

    Skeptical wrote on Jul 20, 2008 11:02 AM:

    " Now THERE'S a worthwhile and necessary reform program! I'm 100% behind it! And while you're at it, please add to the list the prohibition of these home-spun wannabe elected judges, most of whom have absolutely no knowledge whatever of the law. The abuse of the law and the the poor victims of these black-robed wearers (who aren't even required to have a high school education) is scandalous. Hoewver, Dave, you're talking about a gigantic reform movement which shady trial lawyers and their powerful ABA insure against with Washington's largest D.C. lobbyists-donors network. Where to begin? Behind the barricades? "

    Iris wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:25 AM:

    " Frivolous lawsuits need to be made illegal in this stae as it is in many others. People would think twice about initiating a lawsuit if they were required to pay the costs for whoever won the suit. Too many peopel threaten to sue in order to get their way because of the cost to defend yourself EVEN IS YOU HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING ILLEGAL. Anyone can bring a lawsuit, simply if they have the money to hire a lawyer and want to ruin you "Legally". No wonder people hate lawyers. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


A new look: What’s in the plans for the SV West End streetscape.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality