News : What’s behind SSVEC’s rate request? : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


What’s behind SSVEC’s rate request?

Cooperative says cost of doing business, other issues have brought about proposal

By Laura Ory
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, Jul 09, 2008 - 05:28:04 am MST

SIERRA VISTA — A first-class stamp was 29 cents, a gallon of gasoline was under $1.50 and Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative electric rate was 9.85 cents per kilowatt-hour in 1993.

Well, the electric rate has stayed the same for the past 15 years, but the costs to provide it have gone up, much like everything else, said Creden W. Huber, the electric cooperative’s CEO.

That’s why SSVEC has applied for a rate increase, he said.

The increase would take the 9.85 cent rate up to 11.83 cents per kilowatt-hour. SSVEC also wants a $5 increase for the cost of basic service, an amount charged no matter how much electricity is used, from $7.50 to $12.50.


Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Energy and Marketing Manager Albert Gomez walks through a residential attic in Sierra Vista while performing an energy audit Thursday. (Mark Levy-Herald/Review)


With the rate increase, the customers could pay about 7 to 9 percent more compared to their current bill, said Jack Blair, chief member services officer for SSVEC.

Based on 2007 data, the average home uses about 741 kWh per month, resulting in a bill of about $89.74 from SSVEC. For the same amount of electricity, the same bill would reach about $100.59, or just over 12 percent higher, with the rate increase. But other factors, such as the continued increases in the cost of gasoline or greater energy use, would mean that number may actually be higher.

The electricity providing equipment SSVEC buys, from wire to wooden poles, has increased due to global and national demand and so has the power they buy, Huber said. Although SSVEC has not increased their electricity rate, their power provider, the Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, has. In 2005, a 15.44 percent AEPCO rate increase was approved, which resulted in a 9.7 percent increase to SSVEC members.

Along with the rate increase, AEPCO created a fuel and purchased power cost adjuster, which allows AEPCO to pass on changes in the costs of coal, natural gas and purchased power, every six months. Since 2005, AEPCO’s bill has increased 40 percent, which resulted in a 24-percent increase in members bills, Blair said. For now, they expect AEPCO’s bill to keep going higher.

Alternative energies such as solar and wind power are something SSVEC looks toward in the future as the technologies improve, but for now the cooperative is sticking with coal power to keep member costs low.

As news of the requested rate increase reaches members, SSVEC begins to get calls from concerned customers. As a nonprofit, it’s in their interests to keep their expenses down, too, Blair said. They only expand their lines when it’s needed.

“We build it when they pay us for it,” Blair said.

SSVEC also has been able to delay a rate increase with other revenue means, such as contracting with Fort Huachuca, offering joint use of power poles and providing Internet service, Blair said.

They’ve also added automatic meter reading technology in rural areas, so they don’t need to drive out to read meters. “We’re doing what we can,” Blair said.

Though overall revenues were about $4.6 million in 2007, they operated at a loss of about $900,000 in providing electricity to members.

Average customer energy use is also on the rise, meaning higher bills. But there is where customers can help reduce their bills, Blair said. “You’d be surprised at how much energy is wasted,” Blair said.

Blair found a $15 reduction to his bill when he switched all his lights bulb to compact fluorescent ones. The cost of bulbs will eventually be absorbed in the savings.

Lowering your heating temperature in the winter and raising your air conditioning temperature in the summer also can make a difference. Just one degree can mean a savings of 3 percent on your bill, Blair said. Other common ways to save include checking your air filters regularly and unplugging appliances from outlets when possible.

SSVEC also offers free energy audits for customers who are using more energy than they should. After customers first review the possible reasons for their high energy use on the phone or online, Albert Gomez, a energy management specialist for SSVEC, may visit the home or business. Broken home thermostats, or a grill left on for days, can add hundreds of dollars to a monthly bill, Gomez said.

SSVEC includes other energy saving tips in their newsletters and Currents magazine, Blair said. They also are working on creating new ways to help customers reduce energy use.

The irrigation companies SSVEC serves have agreed to have their electricity supply cut off during certain times of the day, when energy costs more to provide.

In about three to four years SSVEC may be able to offer a similar system to residential customers, for hot water heaters and other appliances, Blair said.

They also hope to offer low-interest loans to customers interested in making an older home more energy efficient. For now, it might be worth investing in some energy-saving options before bills go up, Blair said.

The request has gone to the Arizona Corporation Commission, the state’s utility regulatory agency, which will review it over the next few months. The public will be able to give their comments to the corporation commission.

If the rate increase is approved, it won’t take effect until another 12 to 18 months, sometime late in 2009.

How much will it be?

The rate increase is expected to increase Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative’s portion of your bill by 10 to 12 percent, based on 2007 figures.

To find out how the increase will likely impact you, take out one of your 2007 bill totals and multiply the total by 1.11.  For example, if your average bill was about $100 each month in 2007, you can expect it be about $111 next year.

How am I charged?

You are charged by the number of kilowatt-hours, kWh, of electricity used. One 100-watt light bulb left on for an hour uses a tenth of a kilowatt-hour. A 3,500-watt air conditioner uses 3.5 kWh per hour. Your previous meter reading is subtracted from your present reading and multiplied by a set number to determine your kilowatt-hours used. Your billable usage is currently multiplied by 9.85 cents by SSVEC, as a per kilowatt-hour charge to cover the costs to purchase and deliver energy. The increase would set that amount at 11.83 cents.

Other charges

• Cost of basic service: The monthly minimum for providing service, even if you use little or no energy during the month. The proposed increase is $5 to $12.50.

• AEPCO fuel adjustment: Determines rate adjustment in connection with increase or decrease in the price of power. The current amount is $12.64 but will be absorbed into the base charge increase.

• ACC Environmental Surcharge: A measure mandated by the Arizona Corporation Commission requiring nearly all Arizona utilities to generate or buy a portion of their power from renewable energy sources. The surcharge is associated with the development of these sources of energy.

• Taxes: In 2007 SSVEC collected nearly $11 million in taxes. This money goes to the government.

There may be other charges you have chosen, such as Operation Roundup, which rounds up you bill total to the next whole dollar amount, to be used for charitable projects. The Sun Watts Green Contribution Program is another optional charge.

I don’t like it. What can I do?

To find out more about the rate increase you can call the Arizona Corporation Commission at (520) 628-6550, and speak with a representative of their Consumer Services Section to find out more about the electric company’s proposed rate increase. Your comments become part of the data that the Commissioners review prior to making their decision. Staff also can assist you or your community with procedures for filing petitions, arranging for a public comment session or providing information on becoming an official party to the case.

Sources: Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative and the Arizona Corporation Commission

Herald/Review reporter Laura Ory can be reached at 515-4683.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    SV Resident wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:40 AM:

    " If rates haven't gone up, then why has our monthly bill steadily increased despite us working hard to turn off lights, unplug electronics at night, not use the A/C unless absolutely necessary, and shut down items when we're not here? The fuel adjustment alone is 50% of our bill! And all at once? What kind of planning is THAT? Yes, everything goes up, but it should be a bit every month, not in one nasty swipe! "

    Bob wrote on Aug 19, 2008 4:01 PM:

    " I got my Aug bill and was shocked at AEPCO's fuel adjustment charge. I called SSVEC and they mentioned the ACC can pass this charge every 6 months. I called ACC to ask them about this, and it turns out we can expect this possibly on a monthly basis and of course, they mentioned that SSVEC should have explained this to all of us. I'm going to have to possibly pay $50 to $100 extra a month? "

    David wrote on Aug 14, 2008 7:35 PM:

    " Received my August electric bill and was happy that my usage was down from 1781 kWh to 1052 kWh; however I noticed that the AEPCO rate jumped from $35.17 to $42.08. Last month the AEPCO rate was almost 2 cents per kWh (.019). This month it jumped to 4 cents per kWh. It sickens me that my usage cost is $102.21 and AEPCO added an additional $42.08 onto my bill. That is about a 40% charge from AEPCO for having electricity. Something needs to be done during these hard times. "

    Changes wrote on Jul 21, 2008 1:08 PM:

    " We Americans need to get with it. I was just in Europe. There, when you leave a hotel room, you pull your key card out of a reader and all the lights and a/c are turned off. Maybe hotels should consider this. It would be nice to have in homes too. We need to start harnessing more wind and solar power. Maybe even Nuclear energy. We need to stop dependending on foreign oil! "

    Rural dweller wrote on Jul 19, 2008 6:15 PM:

    " I don't know anyone who can afford to build a mile of line to a single home. The cooperative doesn't do it for free; it is up to a homeowner or a developer (in the case of multiple homes) to pay for most of the construction expense. Developers usually have the necessary funding; an individual homeowner usually does not. Which do you suppose is going to get those utility lines constructed? "

    To Rural dweller wrote on Jul 19, 2008 6:06 AM:

    " You oughta get in to the city someday.
    Where they run a mile of line to service one home in the rural areas, that same amount of like would take care of many, many homes in the city. "

    Borderline wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:58 AM:

    " Boy oh Boy!!! I sure am happy I went solar, have my own well and septic system. All utilities will be going for rate hikes soon to offset the added expense of $5 a gallon for gas. "

    Rural dweller wrote on Jul 14, 2008 9:17 AM:

    " In a cooperative we all bear the costs for the entire system.
    I live in a remote, rural area of the county. To the extent you "subsidize remote areas," my neighbors and I "subsidize" the massive growth in electric poles, lines and equipment in Sierra Vista and other areas within the cooperative's territory.
    Access to rural areas vs. urban growth--care to guess which price tag is higher? "

    why our rates are high... wrote on Jul 13, 2008 9:45 PM:

    " There are 2 reasons our electric rates are high and neither are under SSVEC's control: 1) SSVEC's service area is very rural so distribution costs are high. it would be fair to say that those living in denser areas like Sierra Vista subsidize those living in remote areas. 2) AEPCO charges SSVEC about 7.2 cents-per-kwh, about what I paid at retail in my previous location. This may also have to do with rural location. I agree with previous poster that AEPCO's charges need more scrutiny. BTW, AEPCO and SSVEC are both part of Touchstone Energy. "

    To Mark wrote on Jul 13, 2008 2:15 PM:

    " You are correct, the per-kwh increase is 20% and flat-rate increase is 67%. Because of the flat-rate increase, the overall percentage will be higher for low-usage homes. If you do-the-math, you'll have trouble coming up with $89.74 cited in the example. That's because it includes AEPCO fuel adjustment. As noted, the current fuel adjustment is being rolled into new rate, so the effective increase is much smaller than 1.98 cents-per-kwh. However, by the time the new rate goes into effect, you can be sure the fuel adjustment will be back. Download the 681-page rate case at www.cc.state.az.us (docket E-01575A-08-0328) "

    AEPCO wrote on Jul 11, 2008 10:57 PM:

    " AEPCO is the problem here. No accountability, a runaway budget and lack of prudent fiscal restraint. AEPCO simply passes its costs along the line and the SSVEC rate payers take the hit. This is not an openly accountable arrangement. We need to dig a bit deeper here for the answers. "

    Mark C. wrote on Jul 11, 2008 1:36 PM:

    " Instead of saying (20% of $9.85 is $11.83) I should have said the 9.85 + 1.97 = 11.83, ($1.97 is 20% of $9.85.) "

    Mark C. wrote on Jul 11, 2008 1:32 PM:

    " I'm a bit confused here... there is a 60+% jump in the cost of Basic service and a 20% jump in the price of electricity (20% of $9.85 is $11.83.) How is it that a 60% and a 20% increase in monthly costs is only going to cost me 7-9% as stated by SSVEC or the 16% cited in the example? Where can we find more detailed information? There are also rumors floating around about SSVEC not purchasing energy from the lowest cost providers, can someone look into this? "

    supportive of coop wrote on Jul 9, 2008 10:47 PM:

    " I don't understand what greed has to do with a non profit organization raising bills. After all these years the only increases in the bills have been AEPCO fuel adjustments and other ACC charges that are handed to SSVEC and they just have to pass it directly to customers. These fees are beyond SSVEC's control. SSVEC seems to have worked hard to control their expenses and I do not think this is an outrageous request. Use electric conservation tools to help reduce costs, SSVEC is happy to help with helping to use less electricity! "

    To fixed income wrote on Jul 9, 2008 10:15 PM:

    " Hey fixed income. That means your income is fixed and never goes up. Or are you on social security which has gone up more than my paycheck the past 10 years. Or government retirement which has also gone up more than my paycheck. And we had all better get used to increasing prices and start to find ways to cut back. Start by conserving energy and its good for the planet too "

    Have em help wrote on Jul 9, 2008 8:25 PM:

    " I wonder if some of you read the article at all or just complain about everything. I read they offer to send someone to your house to try and lower your electric bill. Take advantage of it. And Blair says he cut $15 from his bill by using these special light bulbs. Use them. Things are tough all over. Travel less and use less gas. Turn up your heat and air down and save the money. Jeez "

    Patrick wrote on Jul 9, 2008 7:31 PM:

    " Let's thank the folks at SSVEC for this very detailed description of the factors going into this rate increase. As a Co-op, we all have a piece of the company, and this is necessary to keep them operating. For those who feel they are greedy, the board of directors if people that live in town and are their customers. It's in the best interest of all of us, as long as we still want electricity service! "

    To Concerned Citizen wrote on Jul 9, 2008 4:46 PM:

    " Greed? Did you miss the part of the article that said they have not increased rates in 15 years, despite operating at a $900,000 loss last year? Since they're a non-profit with public records, you should have no problems verifying their "money grubbing" expenditures. "

    John wrote on Jul 9, 2008 12:51 PM:

    " AEPCO rate increase and fuel adjustment were not mentioned in the first article on this subject. Anyone who didn't notice a sharp increase in electric bills in the last 3 years has been asleep at the switch. "

    Langer wrote on Jul 9, 2008 12:12 PM:

    " Boy, I'm sure glad I don't run an "average home." "

    Lucky wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:46 AM:

    " You citizens who have SSVC are lucky. We live by the river and are served by APS. They just put in a second request to raise rates in less than two years. I'd love for SSVC to serve us. And good luck trying to get APS here at night with an outage. "

    To Greed wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:41 AM:

    " These guys are a cooperative and don't make a profit. And I've been here for over 25 years and at the end of each year I get a check back from them. Check your facts. These guys are like other electric companies who have to make a profit to pay off their shareholders. "

    getoverit wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:34 AM:

    " Once again the sky is falling in Sierra Vista. Settle down everyone - yes it's tough economic times, yes I would rather not spend an extra $11 per month on electricity but it's happening. it's not a conspiracy, it's not an evil plot. I'm pretty sure the SSVEC board is not going on a big vacation with the increase dollars. it's inflation, it's happening everywhere and it's been quite some time since we've seen a rate increase. This is an honest increase folks, look at the annual report, better yet attend the annual meeting. "

    Co-op Member wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:24 AM:

    " Kudos to SSVEC for keeping its members informed. With the price of everything else going up, it was only a matter of time that we would have to pay more for our electricity. At least we weren't blind-sided! "

    Lay off wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:11 AM:

    " No one wants higher rates. But I do appreciate everything that they have done to keep their rates down and it is the first time that have had to increase their costs in like 16 years. And they do so much for the community. And greed? Just how are the greedy. They are a non profit. "

    To Concerned wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:03 AM:

    " If a few bucks a month is going to bother you that much, tighten the belt, use less electricity. Then find something else to complain about. "

    HELP wrote on Jul 9, 2008 10:46 AM:

    " I'm on a fixed income, how am I suppose to pay more, when I have a hard time now? I'm robing Peter to pay Paul, now. "

    Concerned Citizen wrote on Jul 9, 2008 7:43 AM:

    " GREED is what's behind the rate increase. Come on SSVEC you could at least be honest about it. The citizens that use your overpriced service are NOT stupid! "

    Bisbee Moron wrote on Jul 9, 2008 6:04 AM:

    " HAH! I knew AEPCO's costs were up more than the increase, just didnt expect THAT mcuh. I feel vindicated. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


News from the Cochise County Planning and Zoning meeting.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality