News : Governor downs fed’s Real ID : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Governor downs fed’s Real ID

She backs bill that pulls state out of program

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, Jun 18, 2008 - 05:33:37 am MST

PHOENIX — Arizona became the latest state Tuesday to refuse to go along with the federal government’s Real ID Act, a move the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said will have “real consequences” for state residents.

The legislation signed by Gov. Janet Napolitano makes it illegal for her or her agency employees to implement the 2005 federal law. That law requires states to adopt new procedures for issuing driver licenses as well as making the documents themselves more secure.

Backers of the legislation said their main fear is that the new licenses — and the linked databases that would be required — essentially will create a national ID card.

But Napolitano said her primary concern is that Congress, which imposed the mandate, has yet to cover the costs to the states.



“My support of the Real ID Act is, and has always been, contingent upon adequate federal funding,” the governor said. “Absent that, the Real ID Act becomes just another unfunded federal mandate.”

Laura Keehner, press secretary to the Department of Homeland Security, acknowledged the money already being provided and in the pipeline will not be enough to cover the cost, estimated at an extra $8 for each driver license, a figure that ultimately comes out to about $3.9 billion nationwide. But she said the state and its residents will benefit in having a more secure document.

Keehner said if Arizona — and the 13 other states that have taken similar action — do not reverse course, it will be the residents who will suffer when the law takes effect as scheduled in 2010.

Potentially most sweeping, she said the law, beginning as early as 2010, will forbid people from boarding commercial airlines without identification recognized by her agency.

Keehner said a passport still would qualify, as would a military identification card. But she said those who lack either one would no longer be able to use their state driver’s license and essentially would no longer be traveling by air.

The same rules will apply for anyone who wants to enter a federal building.

But gubernatorial press aide Jeanine L’Ecuyer said she doubts that any Arizonan ever will be affected by Napolitano’s decision.

“Real ID, for all practical purposes, is dead in the water,” she said.

L’Ecuyer said the November election will result in a new president and many new members of Congress. She said they will realize that the program, at least the way it is set up, does not work and they will scrap the requirement for people to have the new identification cards.

Sen. Karen Johnson, R-Mesa, one of the architects of the legislation, said she has major concerns about protecting individual privacy.

She noted that the Real ID Act requires states to do more to verify the identity of those getting a driver’s license. That means not just a more thorough review of documents but also checking the authenticity of those documents through various databases.

And that, Johnson said, puts much of that information within reach of those who can hack their way into computer systems.

Keehner said the law does not create a single large database but instead allows each state to check other states’ databases. One purpose behind that, she said, is to ensure that individuals are not trying to get licenses in multiple states.

But Keehner said more could be involved, as motor vehicle division employees also would be required to verify the veracity of things like birth certificates, something she said could require exchanging information online with other states’ health or vital records agencies.

Napolitano used the opportunity of signing the bill to make another push for her “3-in-1” driver’s license. That document, available as an option to Arizonans who present additional information to the state, would serve not just as proof of being able to operate a motor vehicle but also would be proof of citizenship.

That allows the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for the limited purpose of entering into the United States from either Mexico or Canada by land. And Napolitano said it would also serve as proof of the right to work legally in this country.

That measure died earlier this session without getting a hearing. Johnson said she sees no reason to resurrect it. And Johnson also noted these licenses would have “radio frequency identification” computer chips in them, allowing someone with a scanner to obtain each document’s unique number.

“They’ll track you everywhere you go,” Johnson said. “I’m sorry. I’m paranoid.”

Federal officials said those RFID chips are designed only to make scanning each person’s information easier at the border and cannot be read at distances of more than 20 feet.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Witness to History wrote on Jun 20, 2008 4:03 AM:

    " Jerry, I'm not taking issue with your point - but when you cite the "Honorable 9th Circuit Court of Appeals" - also known as "Those Loonies in San Francisco" - you don't really help your case. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has the well-earned reputation for being the most activist court in the country. Its disdain for the U.S. Constitution as written has been well-documented and reported for decades. "

    Scared wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:15 PM:

    " The same people complaining about this are the same ones that use a debit or credit card to buy gas. Go figure, someone knows where you are most of the time. "

    Ben was a drunk... wrote on Jun 19, 2008 3:31 PM:

    " Y'all need to break out those aluminum foil hats and screw them on real tight. KCS is right, Janet has much to lose, god forbid we try to figure out who belongs here and who is scamming us with our own tax dollars paying their way. I've got nothing to hide. Somebody wants to take away my rights? There better be a lot of them, unlike oil, there is no ammo shortage in America.
    PS The Constitution was created in 1775, Commercial aviation came 150 year later. Times have changed. "

    outsider wrote on Jun 19, 2008 1:50 PM:

    " It is the governments way to create a national data base on all people. Giving up your privacy for your safety some are willing to trade. I am not one one of them. I do not trust the government anymore than I trust a bad guy. Giving up your privacy does not guarantee your safety. You need to be more responsible for your safety. "

    To Life Long... wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:10 AM:

    " I am neither paranoid or a liberal, but a citizen who prefers not to have my liberties taken away. Security is much more than the appearance of security. ID cards are not going to identify terrorist, they are merely going to make things more complicated for citizens. We are getting closer and closer to Nazi Germany where we'll have to show papers everywhere we go. Here's my favorite quote from Ben Franklin: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. "

    Witness to History wrote on Jun 19, 2008 2:53 AM:

    " This is amusing. According to the TSA website, acceptable ID for flight includes: Drivers Licenses or other state photo identity cards issued by Department of Motor Vehicles (or equivalent) that meets REAL ID benchmarks (All states are currently in compliance). So Lady Janet is going to have AZ Drivers' Licenses reissued that won't meet the standards? On purpose? How much will that cost? "

    RFID for Mental Cases wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:51 PM:

    " RFID for gun control? Now I've heard it all. Why not just implant everyone with an RFID upon birth and then everytime your driver's license is renewed for all others? How are you going to retrofit all the exisiting guns out there? I'm sure criminals with weapons will be the first in line to comply! How is this technology going to be implemented, by the same technology that the virtual fence didn't accomplish? How many new monitors are you going to hire to make this happen? RFID for everyone! "

    Jerry Vierra wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:02 PM:

    " Laura Keehner, press secretary to the Department of Homeland Security, is blowing smoke. The Honorable 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said it would hear a case concerning the Real ID. The ability they think they have to deprive a person of their "freedom of movement" aboard an airline, guaranteed by the 5th and 14th Amendments, under Liberty, does not exist. Homeland Security in many ways operates outside the Supreme Law of the Land - the United States Constitution. They have no authority to enforce an unconstitutional law! Therefore, they are blowing smoke. "

    KCS wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:54 PM:

    " Of course the governor vetoed this bill.
    If you had a real verifiable ID, it would make it impossible for the pimps, perverts, thieves, border jumpers, welfare cheats and other assorted Democrats to vote her back into office. It's all about the perpetuaion of her ineptitude. "

    WoW wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:02 PM:

    " Stupid comments. Nobody eats ducks? Some nut wants the Real Id to track hunters? I think the idea behind that real ID is to weed out criminals and illegals/same thing. "

    Life-Long SV Resident wrote on Jun 18, 2008 6:55 PM:

    " I can't believe the paranoia concerning this. Do tou have something to hide? Anyone remember how the 9/11 terrorists got what they needed? Big brother?? You like your country? Want to see some idiot sneak in again and blow something up? Keep up the liberal mindset and watch it happen. My security takes precedence over your privacy. "

    RFID for Gun Control wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:31 PM:

    " I wonder if this new system could also be used as a requirement to purchase guns. If so the extra 8 dollars would be worth it, knowing that there would be fewer crazies with guns out there drinking beer and shootin at trees and animals. It could be used to verify hunters applying for trying to buy big game permit tags, licenses and duck stamps too. Why does anyone shoot ducks anyway, nobody eats them. Most improtantly though is to use RFID for Gun Control, hunters and to better track domestic criminals. "

    outsider wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:54 PM:

    " I guess this is the nail in the coffin for the airline industry. "

    Chris S. wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:45 AM:

    " Ah, Big Brother is at it again. Gotta love it. "

    Kudos wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:37 AM:

    " Well kudos to the governor on this one, even if her reasoning is wrong. She should deny it because we don't need big brother watching us so closely. Real security is not going to occur because of new ID cards. More false positives may be more likely. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Tune up: Find out what is ahead for the Cochise County Youth Orchestra.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality