Opinion : Parents should prevail in school choice case : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Parents should prevail in school choice case


Published/Last Modified on Sunday, Jun 15, 2008 - 05:18:51 am MST

Commentary by Charles Hokanson
Special to the Herald/Review

Right before Thanksgiving 2007, voters in Utah voted against what would have become the nation’s first universal school voucher program — a program that hadn’t even had time to be implemented. A high-cost campaign waged by special interest groups worked to raise uncertainty and confusion about the program, and the measure did not prevail.

As a result, pundits and prognosticators from throughout the country came out of the woodwork. School choice was dead, they cried.

The same thing is happening in Arizona today. But pundits in Arizona should take heed of school choice momentum in 2008 before writing any epitaphs.



What the opinion elite failed to recognize earlier this year was that the news of the setback in Utah didn’t depress America’s parents into putting aside their hopes and dreams for a better education for their kids. It emboldened them to fight harder.

In 2008, these parents fought, and they won.

Legislators from throughout the country — driven by the demands of families and community organizers — introduced a record number of school choice bills.

In fact, lawmakers in 44 states tried to enact school choice provisions during this last legislative cycle, a record number.

At the same time, as more and more parents became exposed to the opportunities provided by school choice programs, student enrollment in the nation’s 16 existing voucher and scholarship tax credit programs increased. In fact, student enrollment in school choice programs has grown by 86 percent over five years. That’s momentum!

The demand was so strong that one state, Georgia, enacted a new, $50 million corporate and individual scholarship tax credit program. This program, signed into law in May, will provide private school opportunities to an estimated 10,000 children.

In Florida, Sunshine State legislators recently approved a $30 million expansion to the state’s corporate tax credit program. This expansion will help more than 6,000 children, if the expansion is approved by Gov. Charlie Crist.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal — along with committed Democratic legislators from areas hardest hit by Hurricane Katrina — have managed to act swiftly and pass, in both legislative chambers, a $10 million opportunity scholarship program for New Orleans.

To top it all off, the first school choice victory in 2008 was in an unexpected place: Utah. The state’s existing school choice program, a voucher program for children with special needs, was expanded by $1 million and made permanent.

This year, we also discovered that the base for school choice was doing exactly the opposite of what opponents said it would. The base was expanding, not contracting or dissolving.

In Florida, even news organizations that previously viewed school choice through a veil of skepticism had to admit that Democratic support — and support among African Americans and Hispanics — was growing and growing fast.

And so it will be in Arizona. Sure, in mid-May, an appeals court tossed out two of the state’s voucher programs, initiatives that help children with disabilities and foster kids. But, we’ve been down this road before. Time after time, decisions like these, about school choice programs in the Copper State, have been overturned. Simply put, Arizona constitutional history is on the side of the families in these programs, not the special interests that oppose them.

It would be a mistake to count Arizona’s parents out of the equation. While the ACLU, the state’s teachers union, and the People for the American Way are trying to trumpet this recent decision as a “victory”, many parents see these groups for what they are — cowardly elitists who want to remove disabled kids and foster students from the schools they love.

Reality is reality, and Arizona’s parents simply won’t stand for this verdict.

Parents throughout the country stood on the side of school choice during our movement’s last setback, and parents throughout Arizona will stand, side by side, with their neighbors in this latest battle.

One way or another, I predict that Arizona’s parents, and the state’s most disadvantaged children, will ultimately win.

CHARLES R. HOKANSON JR. is president of the national nonprofit Alliance for School Choice, the country’s largest organization promoting school vouchers and scholarship tax credit programs. Previously, he served as a senior official at the U.S. Department of Education.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Skeptical wrote on Jun 21, 2008 5:56 PM:

    " I think Ray's putting us on. But if he isn't, then his view of life is pitifully short-sighted. The concept of taxation, whether for vouchers or the present funding mess, is to raise money to educate America's future. Any citizen's obligation to participate in that process doesn't end with his own kids' graduation or withdrawal from school. "

    thinking wrote on Jun 21, 2008 5:03 PM:

    " There's always an interesting thought process in paying school taxes; Ray, the taxes you pay will educate a future public that will pay taxes to support your retirement; they will provide productivity to strengthen the economy. These educated young people form a basis for democracy and responsible citizenship as well as scientific research, leadership and development. The costs of an uneducated or under-educated public would be staggering indeed. Others paid to educate you and your children. (I assure you that you didn't bear the full cost!) Ignorance and lack of education are costs we cannot afford. "

    Ray wrote on Jun 21, 2008 12:11 PM:

    " Hey...my kids finished school many many years ago!! I should not have to pay school taxes in my real estate taxes!!! "

    To Life Long SV Resident wrote on Jun 20, 2008 5:39 PM:

    " When my child attended private Christian school, I paid tuition IN ADDIITION to paying taxes - to educate someone else's child? That's hardly fair. I shouldn't have to pay twice! The education my child received in private school was heads and tails better than what he got in public school. And gee, the values and morals learned in Christian school are a definite plus. No smoking, drinking, drugs, sex, or driving violations... years after HS graduation. It's all about CHOICE! "

    Concerned Citizen wrote on Jun 20, 2008 11:39 AM:

    " To Life Long SV Resident: If your tax dollar shouldn't go to any school that allows religion, then my tax dollar should not go to any school that teaches the SATANIC theory of evolution. "

    Life Long SV Resident wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:07 AM:

    " My tax dollars should not go to any school that has a religious agenda (aka church schools). The idea of allowing religion to intermix with a real education (no bible) in schools is ridiculous. "

    Publius wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:26 AM:

    " If parents and legislators put as much effort into demanding excellence from their public schools and their children as they do in trying to destroy the current education system we would have no need of of a voucher system or a system of fly by night education that is not held to the same standards of accountability as our traditional public schools are. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Moments with dad: Photos and local stories about fatherhood.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality