Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Mexican group seeks USPP alliance

By Bill Hess
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, Jun 12, 2008 - 10:03:17 am MST

SIERRA VISTA — The head of a consortium of ejidos in Sonora, Mexico, says the Upper San Pedro Partnership is advanced when it comes to addressing protection of the San Pedro River.

“In our country, we are not advanced as you,” Antonio Cazares Camargo, president of the Union of Ejidos in Sonora, told partnership members on Wednesday.

Because parts of Arizona and the Mexican state of Sonora are part of the Upper San Pedro Basin, both countries have a vested interest in ensuring the international waterway is protected, he said.

But what Mexico needs most is financial help, Cazares Camargo said at a joint meeting of the partnership and members of a Mexican water commission.


(Use arrows above to view more photos)


Saying “we (Sonora) waste a lot of water,” he said both countries have to help.

James Callegary, a hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said the U.S. Congress knows the importance of shared water basins in the two countries and approved legislation to help to the tune of $50 million.

Unfortunately, Congress has yet to appropriate the money.

Sierra Vista Mayor Bob Strain, who is the chairman of the partnership, said the importance of protecting the river’s quality and quantity means action must be taken to have the funds appropriated. The $50 million is not only for the Upper San Pedro Basin. It also is available to any shared aquifers on both sides of the border from Texas to California.

“We might make some progress (with work in Mexico) if we had the funds,” Strain said.

Callegary said the U.S. funds have strings attached, requiring Mexico to come up with a 50 percent match for projects, which can be in-kind work or actual money.

Strain made a presentation about the partnership, telling the Mexican guests about what the organization has accomplished and the work ahead for the group.

In response, two members from the Mexican commission briefed the joint meeting about what is happening in their part of the basin.

Omri Flores Sánchez, the project chief for the Council of River Basins in Sonora, said Mexico established a nationwide water commission in 1992. The commission is part of a law that was enacted to promote social responsibility in protecting the country’s numerous water regions, he said.

In the state of Sonora, there are three regions, and one of them includes the Mexican portion of the Upper San Pedro Basin, he said.

The importance for both sides of the basin “to speak with one voice” will ensure solutions will be integrated, he said.

To him, the partnership and the Sonoran equivalent can become the first binational success story.

The basin area in Sonora is part of the Commission of the River Basin of the San Pedro River, Flores Sánchez said. The commission and partnership must “integrate all of our needs we have in the basin,” he said.

What the partnership has learned and shared will be incorporated into how the commission will look at its responsibilities, he said.

Flores Sánchez and Lucas Antonio Oroz Ramos made their presentation using PowerPoint at the joint meeting. As the engineer for the Organization of Northeast River Basins in Sonora, Oroz Ramos said the Mexican portion of the aquifer includes about 30 miles of the waterway’s flow north into Arizona and covers nearly 5,000 square miles.

The two major population centers are Sierra Vista in Arizona and Cananea in Sonora.

Although the estimated number of wells in the Mexican portion of the basin is not as much as the 4,000 to 5,000 private wells in the Arizona section, he said studies of technical information show areas in Sonora are suffering from a cone of abatement, which in the United State is called a cone of depression, meaning water is not reaching the river to the detriment of the waterway, he said.

As drought has impacted the river in Arizona, the same holds true in Sonora.

“We are in an historic drought,” Oroz Ramos said.

For Strain and others of the 21-member partnership, a  consortium  of  federal, state and local agencies as well as environmental groups and local businesses, what is happening in Mexico to help find solutions to the basin’s problems provides hope.

Oroz Ramos said the goal of the Sonoran group is to see if a U.S. member of the partnership can become a representative to the Sonora group and for a member of the Mexican commission to be part of the partnership to have a better dialogue between the two organizations. However, he said, there will have to be authority from the Mexican federal government to allow a U.S. citizen to be a representative.

Callegary said it will be good for both organizations to have a closer relationship because the issue is a transboundary problem.

For Cazares Camargo, working together to ensure the river served the needs of people and the environment is critical and the joint effort will help dispel rumors on both sides of the border.

He noted that in the past many people in the Sonora portion of the basin thought “Sierra Vista wanted to steal the water in Mexico” to support its growth. Now, he said, he knows better.

BILL HESS can be reached at 515-4615 or bill.hess@svherald.com.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    st sierravistan wrote on Jun 13, 2008 4:08 PM:

    " the ejidos is what the call the so-called co-op (for lack of better word) that resulted form the government seizing lard tracts of land from land owners (like they want to do to the U.S.) and given to the peasants so that they could make a living...except of course that they cannot make a living in a nation which offers no opportunity and no incentive...they get no reweards, sure they pay no taxes (hence poor schools roads etc) but they also have no way to rise up the economic ladder....much as this nation seems to be heading. "

    KCS wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:12 PM:

    " The Mexicans are just as concerned about protecting the San Pedro River as they are about stopping the flow of their citizens illegally across our border. Been there, done that don't trust any beauracrat from Mexico. They want one thing from us dumb Americans...our dollars. By the way...did the border patrol check to make sure that all the people that came from Mexico for this "symposium" went back home? "

    Hey Hess wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:41 PM:

    " Please explain the us English speaking subscribers what the H, ejidos means. "

    st sierravistan wrote on Jun 12, 2008 2:56 PM:

    " Where themoney is...you are absolutely correct, the fifth richest nation on the planet, but the people at the top do not want to participate, so get the good ole citizens of the U.S. to pay for it...what a joke. And what, we can borrow from our good firends the Chinese to pay for it and then owe them even more....heck no! "

    Brian wrote on Jun 12, 2008 1:13 PM:

    " The Mexican representative admits they are poor stewards of the river, yet they are expecting the US to pony up millions of dollars to compensate for their inadequacies and incompetence. He says they “might” make progress with more money. You either will or you won’t. Same excuse our teachers union use- “oh, we’ll get better if you just give us more money”- garbage.
    Protecting the rivers’ quality is in the best interest of all, why do we have to give money to Mexico who is not acting as a good steward of the river?? "

    Think wrote on Jun 12, 2008 11:49 AM:

    " Mexican citizens don't have taxes and don't pay for water. They have no money flow to fix the problem. It is a great thing if they are concerned and funding it will protect our precious water source. "

    High N Dry wrote on Jun 12, 2008 10:50 AM:

    " It's like something out of a bad western. "We are wasting water". But they need the Mexican Governments permission to do something about it or even include someone from the U.S. side in discussions. What do they expect, we just hand them cash and call it all good? Besides, how can Sierra Vista steal water if the river is flowing South to North? The last time I checked Mexico was SOUTH of the U.S. border. Close the Mines and I'd bet there'd be a lot of water. "

    Ejidos wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:54 AM:

    " An ejido is a co-op, isn't it? Why not say "co-op" in the story? & what is the co-op angle in the story? "

    Run Our Country For Us wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:18 AM:

    " We "might" make some progress with the money? I don't understand what they will do with it? This article is very ambiguous in explaining what can or will be done with the money. This article is very disturbing. "

    Cheyenne wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:14 AM:

    " Seems all the mexican organizations want "funding". 50 million is alot of money to give to one of the richest countries in the world. Wished I was rich so I could get free money. "

    Where is the money wrote on Jun 12, 2008 6:10 AM:

    " The Mexicans are all for helping, as long as the US does the funding. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Kids page: Find out what city activities are available this summer for kids.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality