News : Jury can’t reach a decision in border agent's murder case; judge declares mistrial : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Jury can’t reach a decision in border agent's murder case; judge declares mistrial

By Jonathon Shacat
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, Mar 08, 2008 - 10:24:19 am MST

TUCSON — A U.S. District Court judge declared a mistrial Friday for Border Patrol Agent Nicholas Corbett’s murder case after the jury said it was unable to decide on a verdict after about 23 hours of deliberations.

Cochise County Attorney Ed Rheinheimer said he intends to retry the case. Judge David Bury scheduled a new trial for April 22, but that date will likely be changed due to a conflict with a defense attorney.

On Thursday, the jurors sent the court a note stating they were at an “impasse,” but Bury told them to continue deliberations. On Friday at about 2:50 p.m., they sent another note stating they remained in an “unable to agree” status.

Bury polled members of the jury to see if they thought they could arrive at a unanimous verdict if they continued deliberations. Each person on the 12-member panel said, “No.”


(Use arrows above to view more photos)


Grant Woods, the lead special prosecutor, and Sean Chapman, the lead defense attorney, agreed a mistrial declaration would be appropriate. Bury said the jury was “deadlocked” and he granted the motion for mistrial.

One of the jurors left the courtroom in tears. The jury and the defendant exited the courthouse without speaking to reporters.

Corbett was charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide for fatally shooting a Mexican named Francisco Javier Dominguez-Rivera who illegally entered the United States near Naco last year.

Woods said he would have preferred for the jurors to convict Corbett, but he will leave that opportunity up to the next jury.

“I think the jury was very diligent and put in an awful lot of time,” he said. “They reached an impasse, and then put in another 11 or 12 hours after that.”

Chapman said his client was hoping for resolution, but he is ready for another trial.

“I am disappointed the jury did not acquit him. We are prepared to try it again and we will. I believe he is innocent. I believe another jury will acquit him,” he said.

Dove Haber, a public information officer for the Tucson sector of the Border Patrol, declined to comment on the case because it is still pending.

The trial started on Feb. 26. Evidence was presented over the course of almost five days and the jury deliberated for roughly three days.

Dominguez-Rivera entered the United States on Jan. 12, 2007, with his two brothers and one’s girlfriend. Corbett was apprehending them and he shot Dominguez-Rivera. Corbett claimed he acted out of self-defense to prevent the victim from smashing his skull with a rock.

Prosecutors said the shooting was unjustified. They presented evidence including the eyewitness testimony, an autopsy report, forensics and a video.

Defense attorneys said the eyewitnesses were lying. They said the Mexican government influenced their testimony.

They also said detectives with the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office conducted a poor investigation.

Prosecutors accused Corbett of fabricating different versions of what happened in interviews with Border Patrol officials at the scene and then changing his story during testimony so it would match the evidence.

Woods said Corbett is now “locked in” on his story and he can’t change it again.

Woods and Rheinheimer said the next trial will be handled differently because new evidence will be admitted.

For example, prosecutors intend to bring up the fact that Corbett has been involved in a few violent incidents. The judge did not let them use this particular evidence during the trial because it was not disclosed until after opening arguments.

Prosecutors also plan to present evidence regarding Dominguez-Rivera’s good character. Woods said the victim was well respected in Mexico and in the United States.

The defense may try to bring in evidence regarding the fact that the victim had a tattoo on his hand that may be associated with a gang affiliation. According to Chapman, gang members are more prone to be aggressive during apprehension.

Some activists said they were not pleased with the outcome of the trial.

Isabel Garcia, co-chair of the Human Rights Coalition in Tucson, said she thinks there was a considerable amount of compelling evidence in the case, including the video, the forensics and autopsy results.

“I am absolutely shocked the jury could hear all the evidence and not come back with a guilty verdict on second-degree murder, manslaughter or at least negligent homicide,” she said.

In a statement, Border Action Network, a human rights organization in Tucson, said it was “saddened and disgusted by the indecisiveness of the jury.”

“Presumably, Agent Corbett will be released back in to the desert where he will continue to act as his own judicial system — judge and jury, deciding who dies and who lives. This agent’s act of reckless abandon for human life was demonstrated when he shot Francisco Javier,” says the statement.

HERALD/REVIEW reporter Jonathon Shacat can be reached at 515-4693 or by e-mail at jonathon.shacat@bisbeereview.net.

KEY DATES

The following is a brief timeline of the case.

• Jan. 12, 2007 — Nicholas Corbett fatally shoots Francisco Dominguez-Rivera near Naco.

• Jan. 17, 2007 — Guery Flores, Cochise County’s medical examiner, performs an autopsy on Dominguez-Rivera.

• Feb. 27. 2007 — Cochise County Sheriff’s Office completes its investigation and forwards a report to the County Attorney’s Office.

• April 23, 2007 — Cochise County Attorney’s Office charges Corbett with first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide.

• Aug. 6, 2007 — The first-degree murder charge is dismissed during a preliminary hearing in Justice Court in Cochise County.

• Sept. 24, 2007 — Corbett’s case gets moved to federal court in Tucson.

• Nov. 6, 2007 — Cochise County Attorney’s Office hires former state attorney general Grant Woods and Tyrone Mitchell as special prosecutors.

• Dec. 17, 2007 — Judge David Bury agrees to allow Jim Calle to replace Daniel Santander as one of Corbett’s attorneys. Sean Chapman remains lead defense attorney.

• Jan.  17, 2008 — Corbett’s defense team goes to scene and finds gloves belonging to the victim that detectives had failed to collect as evidence.

• Feb. 26, 2008 — Corbett’s trial starts with jury selection in U.S. District Court in Tucson.

• March 7, 2008 — Judge declares a mistrial after jury says it cannot come to a decision.

Compiled by Jonathon Shacat•Herald/Review



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Michael Dale wrote on Mar 21, 2008 7:41 AM:

    " In response to the person that doesn't beleive that Tattoos show aggression--WAKE UP! No one said that the illegal immigrant was killed because he had a tattoo. He was threatening the BP agent with a rock. The prosecution is trying to say that the illegal immigrant is a person of "good charactor". How do they know. He is illegal, he has no business being here in the first place. Gangs' tattoo their members (proudly) to show their affiliation. So, if the tattoo is a gang tattoo then the illegal immigrant is not of good charactor and is probably VERY violent. "

    Michael Dale wrote on Mar 21, 2008 7:28 AM:

    " Well I see that Ed Rheinheimer apparently can't deal with the situation and has to hire Grant Woods to prosecute Corbett. I have seen Guery Flores' work and am amazed that any of his "findings" are allowed in court. I am not surprised that the Cochise County Detectives did a shoddy investigation. That's par for the course. "

    Concerned American wrote on Mar 20, 2008 6:41 AM:

    " To retired cop and any of you who favor the illegals, lets just open up the borders and let them all in freely to take over our nation!!!!! what a bunch of morons... "

    retired cop wrote on Mar 18, 2008 8:25 PM:

    " To whatever, No I dont believe everything I read but I have seen dirty cops with my own eyes. And heard them tell lies in court.I got one fired one time. Most are good but their are many bad federal agents. Many DEA and FBI agents just want to make a name for them selves. "

    Whatever wrote on Mar 18, 2008 11:58 AM:

    " Retired Cop -- So it is written and so it is true. Do you believe everything you read? "

    retired cop wrote on Mar 17, 2008 6:16 PM:

    " Some of you people dont want to know the real TRUTH. Like I said read Lee Morgans book The Reapers Line. He investigated crooked Gov.Agents for the US Customs Service. In May of 2001 there were 45 Border Patrol agents under investigation for criminal acts,and this was just in the Douglas station.76 in Cochise County. He also states the US Border Patrol is the most corrupt federal law enforcement agency in US history. "

    To Retired Cop wrote on Mar 17, 2008 2:02 PM:

    " No one with a lick of sense believes your a retired cop, maybe it is a fantasy of yours. If so in favor of Mexico, and claim we aren't any better, don't let the door hit you in the backside. "

    retired cop wrote on Mar 17, 2008 11:28 AM:

    " All you people that stick up for the Border Patrol should read The Reapers Line written by a Special Agent for the US Customs Service. At least read pages 515 to 525. Some of you people need to get your head out of the sand and see what is going on in this country, the USA is almost as bad as Mexico when it comes to law enforcement. "

    Ron wrote on Mar 17, 2008 10:28 AM:

    " "Prosecutors also plan to present evidence regarding Dominguez-Rivera’s good character."

    I'm confused. He is in my country illegally and yet he is of good character.
    "

    Get Real Mark C. wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:38 PM:

    " Rheinheimer is doing his job? He couldn't do it, he had to hire, a hired gun to do it for him, at a cost of approximately a quarter of a million dollars to the taxpayers of Chochise County. What world do you live in?
    Time for him to go at election time. "

    Mark C. wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:33 AM:

    " Mr. Rheinheimer is just doing his job. What type of country would this be if every law enforcement officer were beyond suspicion regardless of the evidence?

    I personally, am reassured by the fact that our law enforcement is being held accountable. I also hope that Corbett is innocent, although I'm willing to leave that decision in the hands of a jury. May Justice be victorious.
    "

    Shelly wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:14 AM:

    " Unfortunately almost all Border Patrol Agents work alone. Most people cannot not grasp the concept. Imagine being an Agent and attempting to apprehend a group of illegals and one grabs a rock. Once you are incapacitated you are dead. "

    Mark C. wrote on Mar 13, 2008 4:26 PM:

    " Why didn't Corbett have backup? Why was he out there alone apprehending groups of immigrants? An officer is out in the middle of nowhere, apprehending three men and a woman.. that's a very dangerous situation for everyone involved.

    We shouldn't be putting our Border Patrol Agents in these types of sitautions alone. It's not fair to the agent, and it's not fair to the people who are being apprehended. "

    AZNative wrote on Mar 11, 2008 1:47 PM:

    " Well it was stated before on another thread. The people of Cochise County need to insure Mr. Rheinheimer is unemployed after the election. Maybe he can go to work with the PC Procecuters where Woods hangs his shingle. "

    kathy andersen wrote on Mar 10, 2008 9:53 PM:

    " Once again Mr.Rheinheimer will not prosecute the real criminals in Cochise County.He only goes after the innocent! What's the matter no pay off on this case Mr. Rheinheimer. Is it time for another recall effort. "

    Rheiheimer has to go wrote on Mar 10, 2008 8:24 PM:

    " Election is coming up, Rheiheimer has filed to run again, after spending about a quarter million trying to convict Corbett, in a case that should have never been bought to trial. Anyone in Chochise county that votes for him is uneducated. "

    JOHN wrote on Mar 10, 2008 8:53 AM:

    " Why is it that when this type of thing happens it’s always a race issue? I know for a fact that Nick did not go to work that day to shoot someone. It has nothing to with him being Mexican or Illegal. I has to do with what he did when he was confronted, even if it was a 45 year old white guy he would get shot throwing a rock or acting in an aggressive manner with the means to do bodily harm, the opportunity to do bodily harm and the intent. "

    t wrote on Mar 9, 2008 10:29 PM:

    " The hardest part with this case is that everyone involved screwed up, let's say that even if there were no rock involved. Corbett by not remembering his basic safety positioning. The illegal for being illegal. the BP for using poor quality imaging and single agents covering large areas. The CCSO for a poor investigation. The US for allowing the Mexican consulate to prep the illegals. County Attorney for everything they did in this case. Defense for not being more vocal about claims of improprieties. The taxpayers for allowing this farce to continue! This case can't be won by anyone. "

    Think about it wrote on Mar 9, 2008 8:51 PM:

    " I have to ask. Is this case in pursuit of justice or is it politically motivated? Is Mr. Rheiheimer out for justice or is he out to make a name for himself? The case was moved out of Cochise County at Mr. Rheiheimer's request, yet he and his hired hand couldn't convince a jury of 12 that there is enough evidence to convict. So why are we supporting this retrial? Why does Mr. Rheiheimer think any other jury will be convinced a second time around. How many rounds will we need to endure? "

    Think about it wrote on Mar 9, 2008 8:45 PM:

    " Think about it. Ed Rheiheimer hired a special prosecutor to prosecute this case. You would normally not prosecute a case in court unless you felt you could win the case. It seems that Mr Rheiheimer did not feel he could win the case so he outsourced the prosecution. Even the hired gun could not win the case for him, because the evidence doesn't support a conviction. In my OPINION, Mr. Rheiheimer's obsession with this case reminds me of the Mr. Nifong's pursuit to fabricate a case against those Duke kids in North Carolina. "

    sosad wrote on Mar 9, 2008 3:45 PM:

    " that this country has forgotten our Vets who fought for our freedom. Illegals should fight in Iraq as well. I bet that would stop them. Ask even legal citizens about Pearl Harbor, they tell me they didn't know of it until the movie. Have we forgotten Ira Hayes on Iwo Jima? Do you even know? Go the the reservation and ask the American Indian about illegal immigrants, ask them what happened to their land, language, dances and culture. Vietnam and Somalian vets are sleeping in cars in SV once again HELLLOOOOOO "

    Seal up the southern boarder first wrote on Mar 9, 2008 9:04 AM:

    " Ed Rheiheimer and Grant Woods sound like they are trying to railroad Corbett. To "small problem" if you were in the situation you decsribed in your blog, BAN would not be speaking out for you, they would portray you as an American Criminal illegally crossing into Mexico and deserving your fate at the hands of the corrupt Mexican police. Don't fool yourself. If we seal up the southern border we will have fewer incidents like this. Build the fence! "

    HURRAY! wrote on Mar 9, 2008 8:09 AM:

    " To: Glad I moved out. Not half as glad, as the decent people of this area are, that you moved.
    Mexico fears that this lawful shooting of a criminal will cause other criminals to slowdown milking the U.S. economy for Mexico.
    What would have happened if this had happened on MEXICO’S southern border? If agent had been Mexican and the dead felon had been Guatemalan?
    "

    RAD wrote on Mar 9, 2008 7:53 AM:

    " BTW,Mr. Shacat, according to your paper the Defense, also, introduced evidence including the eyewitness testimony, an autopsy report, forensics and a video.
    Please report the facts not your opinion. "

    RAD wrote on Mar 9, 2008 7:49 AM:

    " To What????: Yes, killing people is in the job description, in order to protect your life or someone else's life. And yes, A rock can kill you. It's still used as a war weapon all over the world. Obviously, you have never been at risk of life or limb and you know what's best for everyone from your lazy-boy chair. "

    Dear What???? wrote on Mar 9, 2008 6:56 AM:

    " Noone was killed for being illegal. They were killed for trying to take a federal officers life. I can tell you that it wouldn't be my son, because he is taught to respect law enforcement. Do us all a favor next time, don't respond, and if you do, at least proof read it. "

    me wrote on Mar 9, 2008 5:13 AM:

    " Killing people who are trying to kill them IS in their job description, that is why they carry guns. I can't believe Corbett wasn't acquitted, but you won't find a jury in this state who will unanimously find him guilty of any of those charges now. Wasting Cochise County money... If you work for the county, you can bet there is going to be something, probably overtime pay, that won't be funded because of this. By the way, if Corbett had given a statement to CCSO, they would have screwed that up too... "

    Glad I moved out wrote on Mar 8, 2008 5:36 PM:

    " By reading the below blogs I see Sierra Vista and the surrounding puny towns are full of racist bigots. I'm glad I moved out.

    "

    What???? wrote on Mar 8, 2008 4:31 PM:

    " Let BP do their job since when was kiling people in the job discription???? And since when is there a law that if they are illegal its ok to kill them??? There is tons of white trash out there smoking ILLEGAL drugs that a crime and do they get killed? All you people defending corbet what if that was your son, grandson, brother how would you feel? "

    Send Corbett to jail wrote on Mar 8, 2008 4:19 PM:

    " I see tons of people every day with tatoos Doctors, Nurses,Lawyers,Police ect. and does not mean they are in a "gang" or "Aggressive". So just because this young man had a tatoo means he will act aggressive and is gang related or is it because he is MEXICAN and Corbett thinks he could get away with it??????? Has anyone checked if Corbett has a tatoo "

    JMO wrote on Mar 8, 2008 3:52 PM:

    " Thanks for the information about Isabel Garcia. I didn't realize she was employed by Pima County, and as a legal defender. I've only seen her at BAN meetings and there was nothing "balanced" about her views on illegal immigration, open borders or amnesty for all illegals. "

    anon wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:38 PM:

    " Stop sending border patrol agents into the wild alone. If he had a partner with him this probably wouldnt have happened, and if it did then he would have had backup testimony. All police officers should have partners, and especially those that operate out there. "

    small problem wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:08 PM:

    " If only Corbett had given the county sheriff a statement in the beginning. Yeah you can cry Fifth Amendment, but aren't Corbett and the sheriff fellow law enforcers? They cooperate, right? Corbett's evasiveness and changing stories and the troubling forensic evidence posed a moral challenge, and Ed Rheinheimer did not flinch from his moral and legal duty. If you or I were gunned down, executed summarily, in some backwash of Mexico, even over a serious allegation, no due process, I darn well hope some equivalent of Jennifer Allen would speak out on our behalf. "

    Diana wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:34 AM:

    " The jury did the right thing. Yet I wish they would have acquitted him. We all know that he is being railroaded. The same as Ramos and Compean. Why be a border patrol agent if you are not allowed to do your job. Thank you to the selected jury. "

    Independent wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:51 AM:

    " This case has been so mis-handled from the beginning, and so much political pressure applied, that I doubt we will ever be able to find a jury who will be unanimous.

    And Shacat follows Jonathan Clark, who left to return to Mexico to work for a paper there. His bias was obvious in his writings also. Give me the facts, babe, I'll do my own interpretations.
    Why would the SV/HR assign obviously biased people to cover such controversial cases? And the furor goes on. "

    keith s wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:41 AM:

    " If Woods is such a special prosecutor, why did he disclose evidence too late to use?

    Woods should pay for all the additional costs of the new trial. "

    S. Swartz wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:37 AM:

    " I am sad that an agent trying to protect us in the USA is even on trial.
    Those people entered our country illegally. They could of killed him as in many other cases. Our government puts the agent on trial. How sad?
    May god be with you Agent Corbett. "

    Mexican will own the US wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:06 AM:

    " America, please continue to destroy your defense that is essential to your safety. Make the BP hesitant to do their job so my Mexicans buddies and I can come in and take what ever we want. American laws are so stupid that my sister have 2 handicap kids that are educated and care for by the US tax dollar and she do not even live in the US. The US need drugs and I provide it, now with no BP I will be rich and I will buy my 3rd home in the US. Free medical care too. "

    AZ Native wrote on Mar 8, 2008 9:33 AM:

    " Well does it surprise anyone that Woods is still out for blood. He will never get a conviction unless he can totally OJ the jury. The good people of this State are fed up being the doormat for this invasion of CRIMINALS! If you are here illegally you are a criminal, period. No matter how much the Liberal crackpots want to distort the truth and twist the laws to fit their agenda. "

    tim d wrote on Mar 8, 2008 9:31 AM:

    " cochise county sheriffs dept incompetent? they do great in non-jury trials "

    sosad wrote on Mar 8, 2008 9:20 AM:

    " So sad that the government treats its citizens this way. I support our Border Patrol all the way. Illegals are that, illegal, they trash our roads and lands, threaten our safety and homes, destroy property, litter federal lands. In a business setting, getting personal info on customers, when a hispanic parent was asked the race of the child, parent said white and hispanic but put hispanic because this child will have more opportunities. From the mouth directly. HELLLLLOOOOOO "

    Only Shacat wrote on Mar 8, 2008 8:55 AM:

    " In reading about this in other AZ newspapers, there isn't one reporter that wrote about BAN's opinion other than Shacat. Which proves that he is the most biased reporter in AZ. "

    Eddie Leon wrote on Mar 8, 2008 8:18 AM:

    " Ed Rheiheimer is enjoying his 15 minutes of fame, while posing as Grant Woods' lackey. Isabel Garcia is the Pima County Legal Defender, and she attended every day of this trial. I can only wonder how she gets away with pursuing her personal activism agenda on the taxpayer dime year after year. They complain that they don't have enough resources to do their job, but there she is on the County dime day after day attending a trial that she has zero professional involvement with.

    Time for Cochise County voters to hold Mr. Rheinheimer accountable for this insanity. "

    CB wrote on Mar 8, 2008 8:02 AM:

    " Well, I guess Rheinheimer and Dever don't like their jobs much. As far as the "activists," there was no "compelling evidence in the case". The video didn't show a thing (except grainy figures), and some of the forensic evidence was left in the desert to rot. You should be upset with the County's inability to conduct a through investigation. If there had been a competent investigation this would never have gone to trial! All Woods did was showboat and act completely unprofessionally. Of course, he wants it to go to trial again: MONEY, MONEY, MONEY! "

    Bias Shacat wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:55 AM:

    " Shacat just had to get statements from his good friends at BAN, and the victims/criminals good character, and respect in Mexico and the US. "

    YIPEE wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:52 AM:

    " Now that stinking Rheinheimer is going to spend how many more for the taxpayer dollars, to retry Corbett? He needs to go, be out of office. "

    Iris Lynch wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:38 AM:

    " In this article there are two sentences quoted from the Corbett side of the issue and the balance of the article quotes many people involved in the case and many people NOT involved in the case, all against Corbett. Therefore, i8t would not be a leap to say the Herald is all for hanging Corbett.

    The TRULY sad part is that you folks do not even SEE your bias. "

    KCS wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:08 AM:

    " All law abiding people need to rally around Agent Corbett and thank him for having the courage to defend our border and his own life. He did nothing that any one of us wouldn't do if confronted by a gang of criminals and one of them was weilding a deadly weapon and refused to drop it. How sad that heroism and courage have been turned around this bad and the hero now becomes the criminal. Let this good man go so he can get back to work. "

    me wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:00 AM:

    " Shacat and the SV Herald, you amaze me. Your blatant biased articles against the Border Patrol throughout this whole thing have been disgusting. Why don't you make more of an effort to be a real AMERICAN paper and get BOTH sides of the story. If you are going to get a quote from BAN, why not attempt to get a qote from the Border Patrol Union, or someone who believes the evidence in the trial showed that Corbett was innocent. You have a responsibility to report all sides, and you have failed in this instance. "

    KB wrote on Mar 8, 2008 6:40 AM:

    " I want to know the juror break down. How many for and how many against? "

    KB wrote on Mar 8, 2008 6:39 AM:

    " "Woods said Corbett is now 'locked in' on his story and he can’t change it again." Hmm. Well, guess what, Woods? We've only HEARD one story from Agent Corbett. HE NEVER GAVE A STATEMENT! And, if you want to talk about how his "statements" to other agents don't match, why don't you talk about how two of the agents with different testimony talked to Agent Corbett AT THE SAME TIME! This came out in trial. Or have you forgotten already? "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Holding history: Visit the Triangle T Guest Ranch in Dragoon

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality