Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Corbett’s defense attorney files response to motion for discovery

By Jonathon Shacat
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, Dec 27, 2007 - 06:15:10 am MST

Herald/Review

BISBEE — An attorney representing a Border Patrol agent charged with murdering an illegal immigrant near Naco has filed a response to the state’s motion for discovery in the case.

Nicholas Corbett is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide for killing Francisco Javier Dominguez Rivera in January.

On Dec. 14, Tyrone Mitchell, one of the attorneys prosecuting the case, filed a motion for discovery of items the defense intends to introduce as evidence at trial.



He requested permission to inspect and copy or photograph any books, papers, documents, photographs or tangible objects. He also requested permission to inspect, copy and photograph the results or reports of physical or mental examinations and of scientific tests or experiments in connection with the case.

On Monday, Sean Chapman, the lead defense attorney for Corbett, filed a motion that responds to Mitchell’s request for disclosure of the items.

“Although the defendant has made no request under the rules that would trigger an obligation to disclose these materials, the defendant will comply with this request,” Chapman says.

He adds that the defendant has already disclosed more than 1,000 pages of material to the state. Those items were previously provided to the defense by the Cochise County Attorney’s Office, he says.

In the motion, Mitchell reminds the defense that it must comply with the time limits of the federal rules of criminal procedure regarding defenses of alibi, mental capacity and public authority.

Chapman says Corbett will not present an alibi defense or an insanity defense. But, he will present a defense under public authority.

“At the time of the alleged offense, the defendant was employed as a federal law enforcement officer with the United States Border Patrol. He was acting in the course and scope of his employment when he attempted to apprehend Francisco Dominguez and those with him — all illegal entrants,” he says.

“Further, he was acting in self-defense when he shot Dominguez, who was attempting to disable or kill agent Corbett with a rock,” he continues.

Chapman says Corbett will assert defenses available under the U.S. Constitution and federal and state statutes, such as supremacy clause immunity, justification in the use of deadly force by a peace officer, justification in the execution of public duty and self defense against the use or threatened use of deadly force.

In an e-mail to the Herald/Review on Wednesday, Grant Woods, the lead prosecutor in the case, says he is aware  of  Chapman’s  recent  filing.

“The defense is required to turn over all of its evidence and any proposed testimony by so-called experts. We expect them to do so and if not I’m sure the judge will preclude them from using it,” Woods says.

“We’re looking for a fair trial here, fair to both sides.”

The jury trial is scheduled to begin on Feb. 26.

herald/review Reporter Jonathon Shacat can be reached at 515-4693 or by e-mail at jonathon.shacat@bisbeereview.net.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Native wrote on Jan 10, 2008 6:58 PM:

    " Not a "race" issue? Poppycock! Most individuals, myself included, are against illegal immigration- except of course those in the Ruling Class, those who control government and corporate interests. Is the solution building towers and indiscriminately shooting human beings? That sounds tantamount to extermination. "

    To Native- wrote on Jan 9, 2008 7:31 PM:

    " Nobody is trying to exterminate a race. Just trying to stop illegal entry into this country....period! It is not a "race" issue. It is an issue of people breaking the law and continually being rewarded for it. Perhaps you condone breaking the law. I live according to the law and am against anyone that feels they are above it!!! "

    Native wrote on Jan 9, 2008 5:28 PM:

    " To ENOUGH ALREADY! No, he hasn't been convicted yet. The media is reporting the facts as they are known, with the result that not everyone will like it. Yep, do what the Nazis did, try to exterminate a race - perhaps people like you shouldn't have any rights... "

    ENOUGH ALREADY! wrote on Jan 8, 2008 10:35 AM:

    " Why waste the money on a trial? Media has already hung the man! I say put up towers along the border and shoot anyone who tries to enter the U.S. illegally. Those who are helping the illegals should be prosecuted for aiding and abeding criminals! I no longer have rights. They have all been given to illegals!!!! "

    TheBisbeeKid wrote on Jan 7, 2008 3:57 PM:

    " The forensics has been publicly announced by the coroner and reported in the Herald Dispatch and Tucson papers. The video has been available for viewing on the net. No, he has not been convicted yet - the facts as they are known, are being reported. "

    Jim W. wrote on Jan 6, 2008 5:50 AM:

    " For TheBisbeeKid: So...where did you get your forensic evidence and how were you able to view the video of this incident? Innocent until proven guilty is how our legal systems is supposed to work...but it looks like Corbett has already be convicted by the news media and some of the bloggers here.
    Let the jury decide...of course if the ILLEGALS were not here in the first place...this incident would never have happened....go figure... "

    Murphy wrote on Jan 3, 2008 7:58 PM:

    " Would like to believe it was not on purpose. Benefit of the doubt and presumption of innocence unless proven otherwise. Was it accidental? The agent would never admit that, he will say he was threatened. Was it willful? Unlikely. Negligent? Probably. "

    Yup wrote on Jan 2, 2008 12:06 PM:

    " I think he did it on purpose..not thinking he would get caught. "

    TheBisbeeKid wrote on Jan 1, 2008 10:38 AM:

    " Agent Corbett lied about his life being threatened with a rock. Forensics show that the deceased was shot at range of six to 24 inches, from the back, with the bullet entering downward from the upper left chest. The video also bears this out. Contrary to what Pesky thinks, this agent unfortunately was not competent to handle the situation. "

    t wrote on Dec 29, 2007 10:35 AM:

    " My concern is whether the U.S. Officials will be granting the witnesses some type of legal status in exchange for testimony against Corbett. It has happened before. If Corbett murdered this man, let him pay the penalty. If it was self -defense, let him go. No matter the outcome, ALL of the witnesses must go home to Mexico. "

    fair trial wrote on Dec 29, 2007 9:39 AM:

    " To Pesky
    Corbett can't be proven innocent. The best the jury can do for him is find him Not Guilty. A Not Guilty verdict allows everyone to say he did it but the state just couldn't prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt (The highest burden of proof in the legal system) Corbett will never have his named cleared becuase people will say that he is not guilty-just like O.J. Simpson was not guilty. "

    Pesky wrote on Dec 28, 2007 8:22 PM:

    " I want Corbett proven innocent. He and others in BP are trained how to respond. They are not yahoos! They are trained to handle difficult situations, and I believe Corbett felt threatened. Who says otherwise? Illegal aliens, all related, coached by the Mexican Consulate and a Mexican woman working for BP who allowed the Consultate to interview the witnesses before the County had a chance to do so. This is contaminated testimony. I regret the death of the young man, but I won't sacrifice a good man (Corbett) in this regret. "

    to Trying to be objective wrote on Dec 28, 2007 1:16 PM:

    " No, he shouldn't. When should a criminal/illegal's right/life come before any US Citizen/enforcement officer's right when commiting a crime on US soil? I say NEVER. When should a terrorist's right/life come before ANY U.S. Soldiers? I say NEVER! Criminals want to do the crime, well then deal with WHATEVER consequence comes your way and amen to all peacekeepers. "

    fair trial wrote on Dec 28, 2007 10:33 AM:

    " This case doesn't seen any different than any other murder trial. The attorneys on both sides are always fighting to keep evidence out if it hurt their case and claiming that the other side has not turneed over everything it needed to give them. The judge decides what evidence comes in and the jury decides how much weight to give it. If the testimony from the mexicans is so obsiously flawed then why are you so afraid of this case going to trial in front of a jury of your peers. People just like you. "

    Native wrote on Dec 28, 2007 10:08 AM:

    " Witnesses should not be at an alledged crime scene? Wow, that's a new one on me. Anon makes sense, let the jury decide. "

    anon wrote on Dec 27, 2007 5:16 PM:

    " Let the jury decide. "

    To Native wrote on Dec 27, 2007 3:52 PM:

    " Good question on witnesses' legal status. In this situation it actually can affect their testimony. In this case, the witnesses should not have been here in the first place - so their credibility is already called into question because they were caught in the middle of breaking the law. Second, I believe that they have been "coached" for lack of a better term by their government representatives, and they understand this event is a kindling point in the realm of immigration issues. And, quite frankly, anything that makes the BP look bad is good for them. "

    Lying Witnesses wrote on Dec 27, 2007 3:19 PM:

    " The witnesses are illegals, have been coached before they were inteviewed, and are being coached now. They are kin of the dead illegal, they are probably being housed and fed by the prosecutor until the trial. It would be a stretch to believe one word they say. "

    SV Resident wrote on Dec 27, 2007 3:15 PM:

    " The ILLEGAL ALIENS testimony is diminished by the simple fact that they are here under illegal circumstances (ILLEGAL ALIENS), they have much to gain from this (lawsuits) and they have a foreign government (mexico) supporting them. How can these ILLEGAL ALIENS testimony be even considered to be unbiased and truthful? I refuse to believe anything anyone of them might say in these circumstances. Deport the ILLEGAL ALIENS and free our HEROIC BORDER PATROL OFFICERS. "

    Confused American wrote on Dec 27, 2007 1:18 PM:

    " Last I checked, if something was to be used as evidence, it was required by law that the defense attorney have the ability to inspect it. Where is the issue here? Does the criminal who was shot have rights I, as an American Citizen, don't have? This whole thing is a sham. Corbett was defending himself and our country. "

    Native wrote on Dec 27, 2007 11:28 AM:

    " A witness is a witness, regardless of legal status. How does their testimony diminish the trial to being unfair? It is a real stretch to say that the law here is catering to illegals. That is simply a ridiculous and misguided assertion. "

    Trying to be Objective wrote on Dec 27, 2007 9:57 AM:

    " KB--Here are my questions to you. How do you know that Woods has not turned over all the evidence that is favorable to Corbett? What evidence is this? What prejudices did the deputy (which deputy?) have toward Border Patrol? What mistakes were made at the crime scene? Again, I'm just trying to get the picture here. "

    Trying to be Objective wrote on Dec 27, 2007 9:40 AM:

    " All along I've been trying to keep an open mind on this. I've read all of the newspaper stories and have followed the evidence that was released under the media's public records requests. I'm just trying to understand both sides points of view here.
    Mae--You say that money is being wasted prosecuting this border agent. Do you think that entering the country illegally is, or should be, a "shoot on sight" offense? If the physical and forensic evidence shows that the agent lied about the shooting, shouldn't he be prosecuted? "

    Jackboot wrote on Dec 27, 2007 8:59 AM:

    " Summary executions in the field are a good thing. So what if anger guides my trigger finger? That's the american way isnt it? "

    JB wrote on Dec 27, 2007 8:15 AM:

    " Fair trial? So far, none of our BP agents have had a fair trial because of "testimony" given by illegal aliens. What is to be expected from that!! Mr. Corbett will be railroaded just as the two who are sitting in prison right now. The law is catering to the illegals, pure politics and money. "

    KB wrote on Dec 27, 2007 7:57 AM:

    " Hey, if you are looking for a fair trial Woods, why don't you turn over all the evidence you have that is favorable to Agent Corbett? And perhaps you better include any prejudices the investigating deputy has towards the Border Patrol. Also, the mistakes made at the "crime scene" should be included, if not highlighted and apologized for. Now that sounds fair! "

    Mae wrote on Dec 27, 2007 7:00 AM:

    " why is Cochise County not willing to use this money they are wasting to prosecute this border agent that would not be here if the illegals were not being some where they had no right to be on the fence to stop them from coming. if they would stop the flow of illegals the border agents would not be here. then would not need to hire expensive lawyers. Use the taxpayers money to protect us not criminals. It is our tax dollars and should be used for us. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Local news from your community.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality