News : School board shakeup opens communication : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


School board shakeup opens communication

By Cindy Skalsky
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, Oct 25, 2007 - 05:13:00 am MST

SIERRA VISTA — Certainly the faces and perhaps the style of managing the Sierra Vista public schools will undergo a visible change if Tuesday night’s governing board meeting is any indication of things to come.

With the board’s approval of superintendent Renae Humburg’s retirement on July 1, 2008, and the subsequent announcement by assistant superintendent Bill Roach of his own intent to retire on that date, the school district will, in one fell swoop, be absent the combined 30 years’ experience and institutional knowledge these two top school officials will take with them.

In the wake of that reality, governing board members and administrators alike extended themselves at this week’s meeting to demonstrate their grasp of educational and statutory issues, their financial monitoring efforts, and their desire to write the final chapters in what former school board president Tom Hoskins termed “the tax fiasco.”

It was a meeting unique for its length, degree of detail and pointed attempts to address public anger, questions and reactions that have appeared in the media and been voiced personally or in writing to board members.



Approximately 50 people attended the meeting, a larger-than-normal turnout.

In a call to the public timed to coincide with the board’s acceptance of Humburg’s retirement, Hoskins presented his analysis of the mistake that resulted in this year’s leap in the school property tax rate that took the town by surprise.

“If there had been no mistake last year, all of the taxpayers would have been screaming at the re-assessed property values,” he said. “Because of the large growth of new homes and inflated values of our real estate, the assessor had revalued our property, which in turn caused an increase in our taxes. My opinion is that the increase (in valuations) caused the homeowner not to recognize the decrease (in tax rate) caused by Michelle’s mistake.”

Hoskins’ reference was to Michelle Quiroz, district business manager who admits an error in reporting district property valuations to the Arizona Department of Education for fiscal year 2006-2007. That figure was then used to calculate revenues the state sends to the district and upon which the school property tax rate is based.

It resulted in a shortfall of approximately $4.3 million that is being recovered by this year’s significantly higher taxes.

Quiroz herself was on the agenda to provide a detailed update on the current year’s school budget. She remained on the carpet at some length to explain allocations, current balances, various funds and their purposes, future anticipated repayments from state and federal sources, upcoming spending intentions and their rationales.

For anyone paying attention, it was an education in Arizona school financing, its vagaries and constrictions.

Board members used the opportunity to question the employment of aides and paraprofessionals for special education students (it’s a legal obligation), and to highlight extra expenses the district is incurring due to a shortage of regular bus drivers, custodial staff and higher fuel costs for school buses.

Administrators and board members alike expressed a concern for economy and prudence in spending, as they reviewed water and energy conservation efforts and the disappointing half-million dollars dispensed from the state School Facilities Board for building renewal purposes.

Sierra Vista schools had requested $1.2 million for building renewal and will now need to re-prioritize just where the available funds will be utilized.

In other business, Crisis Response Team leaders Susan Willig and Marty Bangle — counselors at Buena High and Sierra Vista Middle School — reported on the training their 20-member team has received and the levels of “crisis identification” under which they operate.

The group exists to implement Critical Incident Stress Management and most recently went into action following the deaths this summer of four teenagers with connections to the high school.

The District Emergency Response Team, represented by Sierra Vista Middle School principal Jim Sprigg, reported on its activities to update the district-wide booklet for safety procedures in the event of an accidental or natural disaster or need to lockdown schools.

District curriculum director Penny Morris spoke to the public release last week of the Arizona Learns school report cards, the “ranking” by Arizona’s Department of Education of all schools in the state.

Of Sierra Vista’s nine schools, two were rated “Performing,” four were rated “Performing Plus,” two are “Highly Performing” and Pueblo del Sol Elementary achieved the highest category of “Excelling.”

Morris briefed the board and the public on how those scores are assembled and the “factoring in” of requirements by the federal No Child Left Behind Act.

The board approved a number of action items, including asking the Arizona School Boards Association for a proposal to search for a new superintendent, and a renewal of the agreement with Cochise College to award dual credit for certain courses toward both high school graduation and a college certificate or associate of arts degree.

Prior to adjournment, governing board members had the opportunity to remark once more on Humburg’s departure from the district and Roach’s announcement to do the same.

“You have been a mentor to my daughter, who is also an educator, through her doctoral degree. All out of the goodness of your heart,” said board member Nancy Richardson directly to Humburg, as tears welled in her eyes. “We are personal friends, and I have enjoyed every minute working with you.”

Clerk of the board Debra Scott offered, “The two of you have done phenomenal things for this district. I know you won’t stop the good work.”

The current superintendent assured, “It’s not over yet.”

Herald/Review reporter Cindy Skalsky can be reached at 515-4611 or by e-mail at cindy.skalsky@svherald.com.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Give me a break! wrote on Nov 2, 2007 11:03 PM:

    " Why is everyone so critical of the board? The tax rate was set a long time before the mistake was discovered! Nothing could have been done even if the board had been advised--the county and state had already told Quiroz and Roach that. Even when the advanced funds were requested, nothing would have changed this year's taxes. Did they even know that an advance was being requested? The school budget is very complex, as is the funding. This situation will have prepared them to do a better job than a newly elected person without experience. "

    Jacqueline wrote on Oct 28, 2007 11:40 AM:

    " I think this subject is worthy of some "face" time discussion. How about meeting this week for coffee? Denny's 10:00 am on Tuesday, 10/30. Bansheetoo2000@yahoo.com "

    Estan wrote on Oct 27, 2007 2:01 PM:

    " Jacqueline.... brief reminder...Hal Thomas and Deb Scott both served when the $6 million was borrowed in July 2007 and when the stratospheric tax levy was set in August, 2007. They each missed two of the three clear opportunities to see the problem. So I guess they are only 2/3\'s as culpable as the others. :-) And we should keep them? I think not. IMHO, better to clean house and take a risk with unknowns rather that ride a lame horse. "

    Scott Is No Different wrote on Oct 27, 2007 9:07 AM:

    " Debbie Scott is same as the rest of the Board. All got too cozy with the district administration, lost thier objectivity and became part of the problem. They are making a great show of mending thier ways but a new administration with the this Board remaining in place will just rapidly lead to more of the same. We need fresh blood with a willingness to work to provde the best education for our children we can afford. Question really is: "Can we afford to live with the choices this Board will make?". "

    Jacqueline O'Connor wrote on Oct 26, 2007 6:06 PM:

    " Dilbert, don't lump all volunteers with time to spare into a "no-talent" pool. Wrong. You seem to believe that only worker-bees are capable of solving problems, but, alas, they have no time (sigh). Please rethink this. Many excellent people, working and retired, donate time and effort--and excellence to causes and organizations they care about. Doesn't mean we should not hold them accountable, but esteem their efforts, please. "

    Jacqueline O'Connor wrote on Oct 26, 2007 2:38 PM:

    " After the way this situation has been handled, do you trust this board to select the new Superintendent and Assistant? I'd like to see Connie Johnson, Nancy Richardson and Don Rothery, resign and a special election held to select new people to oversee the recruitment process. Why them? They appear to be the longest serving board members whereas Hal Thomas is a newcomer. Debbie Scott is a question mark. Anyone have an opinion on her? Do we want to live with choices made by this board? "

    Remember wrote on Oct 26, 2007 1:07 PM:

    " Remember, Tom Hoskins was on the Governing Board at the time they should have been discovering the computation error before the 2006-2007 budget was finalized. He is as culpable as are the current Board members. "

    Taxed Out wrote on Oct 26, 2007 1:01 PM:

    " The "probing" questions by Board members were quite shallow and intended as cosmetics on their ineptness with the knowledge that their attempt to demonstrate their grasp of educational, statutory and financial issues would be reported by the Herald. Of course, the expectation is that those that didn't attend the meeting to actually see the shallowness would believe the Herald's report "

    DILBERT SAYS wrote on Oct 26, 2007 7:59 AM:

    " Why does it seem as if most of the decisions in my work place are made by drunken lemurs?....Decisions are made by people who have time. Not people who have talent....Why are talented people so busy?....They're fixing the problems made by people who have time. right out of the comics. Gotta love it!! "

    Jacqueline O'Connor wrote on Oct 25, 2007 10:10 PM:

    " Does anyone believe this is a well run organization or a board worth supporting? "

    FLAMING MAD wrote on Oct 25, 2007 7:53 PM:

    " i THINK AN ASSESMENT NEEDS TO BE DONE IN THE ENTIRE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE TO SEE WHAT POSITIONS NEED TO BE CUT. I WOULD GO BEYOND HUMBURG AND ROACH. WHY DOES A SCHOOL DISTRICT NEED A INFORMATION OFFICER AT THE TUNE OF $50,000 A YEAR. BET ALOT OF BUDGET COULD BE CUT IN THAT OFFICE ALONE. THANK GOD FOR THE RETIREMENT OF RAOCH AND HUMBURG. MORE NEED TO GO "

    vote for me wrote on Oct 25, 2007 2:59 PM:

    " I am going to run against the board for one of the spots next november. I am going to do some research and make my decision in dec/jan. I will not post my name as of yet, but I am a Plant manager with approx. 7 years experience in dealing with the issue of productivity, accountability and efficiency for a business. I may not have all the answers but I do have some, and with the public's help, we can overcome these issues and make this district the model for Arizona public schools. "

    Shameful wrote on Oct 25, 2007 1:30 PM:

    " You have got to be kidding? People are enduring real hardships over this mess, and all they can say is "sorry"! I hope they all sleep real well at night! "

    Too late wrote on Oct 25, 2007 11:45 AM:

    " Why wasn't the board doing this for years? It seems like now that all the barnyard animals have escaped because they left the door opened, now they want to finally do their jobs. And my eyes welled with laughter as the keystone cops school board took all of those bumbles and poor statements for 3 weeks trying to blame others and get out some kinds of statement on this tax fiasco. Since the board is only now realizing that they made a mistake I say its too late. Let's recall them. "

    Not Sure wrote on Oct 25, 2007 9:45 AM:

    " The final chapters of this tax and public relations fiasco are going to take a very long time to write. Whether this Board is capbale of writing them and restoring public trust and confidence remains to be seen. It is going to take some extraordinary actions to do so. Making a show of understanding educational issues and monitoring finances will not surfice. They have to demonstrate they understand the overall tax burden placed on property owners and stop whinning about state funding and mandates. They have to find answers to these challenges other than always increasing taxes. "

    Hold up... wrote on Oct 25, 2007 8:05 AM:

    " What Mr. Hoskins said is very true. Stop the negativity long enough to realize true statements! Last year all the property tax values were reassessed and RAISED. You WOULD have seen an increase in taxes last year had the school tax rate been what it should have been. Because the school tax rate was inadvertently too low, you did not see the increase on your tax bill. It is very plain and simple and what he said is absolutely correct. I did receive notice my property value increased, but no significant increase in my taxes. "

    What? wrote on Oct 25, 2007 7:50 AM:

    " So is Mr Hoskins is trying to divert the blame from the school district to the tax payer? "

    Crying wrote on Oct 25, 2007 6:14 AM:

    " I had tears welling in my eyes too, when I recieved my tax bill. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Jr. High Academy: Tombstone experiment working.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality