News : Agent charged with killing illegal immigrant has hearing postponed : Sierra Vista, AZ

Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Agent charged with killing illegal immigrant has hearing postponed

By Jonathan Clark
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, Jun 16, 2007 - 10:05:24 am MST

BISBEE — Cochise County Attorney Ed Rheinheimer said he may seek a grand jury indictment against Border Patrol Agent Nicholas Corbett after a judge postponed a preliminary hearing Friday meant to determine if Corbett can be charged with murdering an illegal immigrant.

Justice of the Peace David Morales granted the seven-week continuance after defense attorney Sean Chapman complained he had not received a complete set of police statements made by six Mexican nationals who were present when Corbett fatally shot Francisco Javier Dominguez-Rivera near Naco on Jan. 12.

Chapman called it “fundamentally unfair” and “outrageous” that the County Attorney’s Office had not fully disclosed the statements.

Without all the evidence, he said, “we are not in a position to fully and fairly cross-examine these witnesses.”


U.S. Border Patrol Agent Nicholas Corbett waits to leave the Justice Court 1 in Bisbee following a hearing on Friday. Protesters are lined up behind Corbett, who is charged with killing an illegal immigrant near the U.S.-Mexico border just east of Naco. (Ed Honda•Herald/Review)


Deputy prosecutor Gerald Till, however, told the judge that he had been forthcoming beyond the requirements of the law.

“Everything that I have, they’ve been given,” he said, noting prosecutors do not have to disclose all the evidence until 30 days after a defendant is arraigned.

Even so, Morales continued the hearing until Aug. 6.

Till said afterward that he could not recall another defendant who had been granted two continuances prior to a preliminary hearing. The proceeding was originally scheduled for May 17, but was postponed until Friday in response to an earlier defense request.

In a criminal complaint filed April 23, Rheinheimer charged Corbett with first-degree murder, second-degree murder, negligent homicide and manslaughter. Corbett cannot be arraigned, however, until a judge or a grand jury rules that the evidence against him meets the level of probable cause.

Now that Morales has twice postponed the preliminary hearing, Rheinheimer said he may ask a grand jury to indict Corbett.

“The judge has a great deal of discretion to grant continuances,” Rheinheimer said. “All we can do is live with the continuance — unless we decide to take it to grand jury instead.”

Grand jury proceedings are considered to be more favorable to the prosecution, since prosecutors control which evidence to put forth and defense attorneys are not present to cross-examine witnesses.

The proceedings are also conducted in private, out of the public eye.

Brandon Judd, vice president of the local chapter of the Border Patrol agents’ union, said he doubted Rheinheimer would take the case to a grand jury, despite the delays in the proceedings.

“The reason he didn’t go to the grand jury in the very beginning is that he wanted this media outpouring,” Judd said.

“That was the whole purpose of him choosing (to go to a preliminary hearing). This way, he made the case much more media friendly.”

The Herald/Review, The Associated Press, the Arizona Daily Star, the Los Angeles Times and KVOA-TV in Tucson all sent reporters to Friday’s hearing at Justice Court 1.

Spectators and witnesses

In addition to the reporters, approximately 25 spectators packed the tiny courtroom, including a number of off-duty Border Patrol agents.

Outside in the parking lot, a group of protesters from the immigrant-rights group Border Action Network held signs in English and Spanish bearing statements such as “No one is above the law,” “Justice for all” and “We demand responsibility on the border.”

“We want justice, and we want the Border Patrol to behave responsibly,” said protester Angelica Nuñez, a restaurant owner from Douglas. “They shouldn’t be taking out their pistols when there’s no reason to.”

There were no civilians protesting on Corbett’s behalf. The Border Patrol agents who came to show their support could not speak to the media due to agency policy.

The charges against Corbett, 39, stem from an incident in which he shot and killed Dominguez-Rivera, 22, from the south-central Mexican state of Puebla, shortly after Dominguez-Rivera and three family members had crossed illegally into the U.S.

Corbett told supervisors at the Border Patrol’s Naco Station that he fired his service revolver in self-defense after Dominguez-Rivera threatened him with a rock from across his truck.

The three family members, however, told investigators that Dominguez-Rivera never held a rock, and that Corbett shot him at point-blank range after running up behind him and pushing him to his knees.

Speaking to reporters outside the courtroom, Chapman criticized Rheinheimer for filing charges based on the word of illegal immigrants rather than that of “a Border Patrol agent who puts his life on the line on a daily basis.”

However, when announcing the charges in April, Rheinheimer said that other evidence, including an autopsy report, a surveillance video and ballistics tests, had supported the family members’ story rather than Corbett’s.

Three other illegal border-crossers that Corbett had captured moments earlier were in the back seat of the truck when the shooting occurred, but told detectives from the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office that they could not see what happened.

The three returned to Mexico in February, while the family members remained in Tucson to serve as witnesses in the criminal case.

Judd suggested that the testimony from the non-related witnesses would help to exonerate Corbett.

“Those three witnesses have exculpatory information, so why aren’t they here?” he asked.

Chapman also was upset that the family member witnesses had been allowed to remain free while in the U.S. They broke the law when they crossed the border illegally, he said, and so they should be in custody.

Peter Schey, a lawyer for the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law in Los Angeles who is representing Dominguez-Rivera’s family, accused the federal government of trying to deport the witnesses on three separate occasions.

“We don’t know if that’s collaboration by the Border Patrol,” he said, “but we are outraged at the efforts to deport them. Had this shooting involved a killing of a Border Patrol agent by an immigrant, and if there were three material witnesses, we have no doubt the U.S. government would have kept them on a very short leash in order to absolutely guarantee their availability.”

HERALD/REVIEW reporter Jonathan Clark can be reached at 515-4693 or by e-mail at jonathan.clark@bisbeereview.net.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Lane wrote on Jun 22, 2007 3:21 PM:

    " Reasonable needs their head examined. Trigger happy agents please. They are almost always outnumbered. Here in the Tucson sector alone they arrested over 500,000 illegal aliens last year without incident, and yet you claim trigger happy. Look at the numbers. A rock can kill or maim you. All people like you do is embolden the aliens and put the agents life in danger. I would like to remind you if it is a tragedy the alien died, but if he hadn't been here to begin with he would still be alive. "

    A.J. wrote on Jun 22, 2007 2:06 AM:

    " If you bring a rock to a gun fight, you can probably guess what the outcome is going to be. "

    m wrote on Jun 20, 2007 6:35 PM:

    " The welfare and lives of our citizens should always come before an illegal. Being rocked is a daily problem for the BPA's, and that is why they have rock vehicles, cages covering all windows on the vehicle. Anyone backing up these illegals should be deported along with them! Since when has another country backed up foreigners over their nationals? Oh yea, only in the U.S.A. I got your back Corbett! "

    Reasonable wrote on Jun 20, 2007 7:15 AM:

    " Now none of us were out there. But evidence has shown that the illeagal may of been shot in the back at a downward angle. Witnesses have stated that the agent shoved him to the ground then shot him. Evidence and an autopsy will prove what happened. And I for one feel that if it was an unjust shooting we should throw the book at the agent! Right now I feel that BP is full of trigger happy police academy failures. BP needs reform NOW! "

    Reasonable wrote on Jun 17, 2007 10:27 PM:

    " I cannot beleive you people. Because a man has a badge does not give him the power to deadly force at anytime. It is up to the laws of the country when an officer can use his sidearm. You people are looking at it wrong it is not about the bp agent or the illeagal. It is about the law. You think that the bp is flawless!? What about in 2001 when the agent raped the illeagal? Or the countless other times the bp has abused there power? This is AMERICA! The DA is doing his job. "

    AC wrote on Jun 17, 2007 4:21 PM:

    " Obviously Cathy thinks she knows it all. Have you, Cathy, been hit in the head with a 5 lb. rock? Border Patrol Agents have. And they have pictures to prove what damage can be done. So, since you believe that a rock won't kill someone or knock them on conscious, let's try it on you. Then, maybe people like you will realize what Border Patrol Agents are up against. "

    t wrote on Jun 17, 2007 2:17 PM:

    " I wasn't there, the only story I have is what is in the news. I will not decide innocence or guilt based on what has been released to the public. There are always three sides to every story; 1.victim 2.suspect and 3.truth. BP Agents have very difficult and dangerous jobs, Illegals can be violent, rocks can kill. The Agent was outnumbered and fearful for his safety. The question that needs to be answered is "Did he have reason to be?" That will be answered at trial. Until then, everyone calm down and go home. "

    Reply to Cathy wrote on Jun 17, 2007 9:42 AM:

    " Do you not realize what a large rock to the head can do? Do you realize what will happen if you throw a rock at a SV Policeman? If they manage to knock out the agent, they can get the agent's gun and kill him. I am offended by your statement. Why do you think border agents should have to be assaulted and not protect themselves? Do you know a girl in Iraq was just rocked to death? You want this to happen to agents? How about following the law????? "

    cathy wrote on Jun 16, 2007 11:26 PM:

    " If it is true that "an autopsy report, a surveillance video and ballistics tests, supports the family members’ story rather than Corbett’s" then legal or not, no one deserved to be shot for throwing a rock at someone. With all the attention given to the border and immigration issues this case must be heard in front of a judge and a jury. "

    John wrote on Jun 16, 2007 9:48 PM:

    " Put the illegal border crossers in a car driven by Peter Schey, escort them back to Mexico and get off Corbett's back. The man did his job. "

    Corbett supporter wrote on Jun 16, 2007 5:48 PM:

    " Whatever happened to "innocent until PROVEN guilty?" And, since when does the word of a lawbreaking non-American hold more weight than that of a law abiding citizen? What has happened to the legal system in this country? We are all in trouble if this is the direction things are going. Attorneys like Peter Schey and Johnny Sutton are a disgrace to what the legal system "should" stand for.....JUSTICE! "

    No surprise here. wrote on Jun 16, 2007 3:56 PM:

    " You really have to be blind to not see the bias in Cochise County. They did a series of stories making it seem the agent was guilty in the Herald, and then they refuse to move it out of jurisdiction after the prosecutor's office and the newspaper have pretty much tainted every local's opinion on this case. Nice job. I have never seen the Herald lay out all the evidence against an illegal--they only go through this fanfare when it is an agent. Why aren't these prosecutors zealously trying illegals who injure agents? "

    DaveH wrote on Jun 16, 2007 12:57 PM:

    " Another case where the word of a Non-Citizen counts more than an American Law Enforcer "

    Lane Bowen wrote on Jun 16, 2007 11:50 AM:

    " I can not believe that Corbett is being charge at all. I am so sick of hearing about the poor illegal aliens. My my how disinfranchised they are. If they don't want to be shot they need to stay in their own country. "

    KW wrote on Jun 16, 2007 11:35 AM:

    " My support goes to Corbett. Since when is doing his job a crime? Illegal aliens are breaking our laws and people like Corbett who risk their lives are the ones who get punished for enforcing them! This is a travesty and its reasons like this that I have lost faith in our justice system. Now we even let these aliens roam in our country illegally. What message is this sending to those aliens who sneak across our border? That its okay to jump across the border and break our laws without punishment. "

    SV Resident wrote on Jun 16, 2007 10:34 AM:

    " I like the way the photographer made his photo look like the BP Agent was already guilty. Why not just a picture of him? They always support the illegal aliens in this paper and the Arizona Daily Star. The illegals in this case need to be locked up and await the trial. Any other person accused of a crime, and a possible flight risk would be in jail. These illegals are both. Our DA is negligent in many instances concerning this case. "

    KB wrote on Jun 16, 2007 10:31 AM:

    " Corbett put his life on the line every day to uphold the laws of this country. And now look! Three people who were in the process of breaking one of those laws Corbett worked to enforce are chosen to testify against him. They can only gain from their testimony. Why should anyone believe it?` "

    m wrote on Jun 16, 2007 8:26 AM:

    " Although I wasn't at there as a civilian to protest on Corbett's behalf, I support him 100%. This is definitely an outrage. "

    Jim White wrote on Jun 16, 2007 7:20 AM:

    " Border Action Network says "No one is above the law" and Peter Shey whining about the illegals being deported? Get real...the group and the dead illegal broke the law by sneaking into this country. Why are illegals above the law by being allowed to stay in this country,given amnesty, and a path to citizenship when they have broken the law entering the U.S and involved in ID theft to work here? No amnesty - no citizenship for any of the 12-20 illegals of all races here in this country! I pray Corbett is not charged in this case. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


At home

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality