Today's Weather


Click for Sierra Vista, Arizona Forecast


Convicted drunk driver has manslaughter term halved

By Jonathan Clark
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, Jun 05, 2007 - 05:17:24 am MST

BISBEE — A repeat drunk driver who in 2004 was sentenced to a total of 21 years for killing two people near Tombstone had his prison term cut in half yesterday after a hearing at which expert testimony showed that his victims could have survived if they had worn seatbelts.

Todd Patrick Allard, 39, of Elgin, was initially sentenced to consecutive 101⁄2-year terms for two reckless manslaughter convictions stemming from an auto collision he caused on May 18, 2003.

The collision claimed the lives of Tucson residents Jose and Beatriz Velazquez, both 52.

The state Court of Appeals, however, sent the case back to Cochise County Superior Court for re-sentencing after it found that Judge Tom Collins had erred by not allowing Allard to present mitigating factors — including the seatbelt evidence — prior to his sentencing.



On Monday, Paul Gruen, a Sierra Vista-based collision reconstruction expert, told new sentencing judge Wallace Hoggatt that the Velazquezes would have had at least a 90-percent chance of surviving the collision if they had worn seatbelts.

“Had they been wearing belts, I think they would have walked away from this,” Gruen said.

Hoggatt, noting that he was required by law to consider the seatbelt evidence, as well as the fact that the deaths of the two Velazquezes were caused by one action rather than two, ruled that Allard should serve his two sentences concurrently rather than consecutively.

However, he refused to reduce the concurrent sentences from 101⁄2 years each, saying that evidence of Allard’s remorse and community support was not enough to mitigate the victim’s family’s suffering — or the fact that Allard was drunk when he caused the collision.

“They didn’t wear a seatbelt, and you drank too much and drove recklessly,” Hoggatt told the defendant.

Allard had a blood-alcohol level of just over .14 — nearly twice the legal limit of .08 — when he skidded through a stop sign on Davis Road at state Highway 80, south of Tombstone, and slammed into the Velazquez’s Nissan pickup.

The collision caused the truck to roll over as many as three times, throwing the two occupants from the vehicle. Both died at the scene of massive trauma.

Allard, who was not injured, initially told police that his brakes had failed, but mechanical tests proved the excuse untrue.  Then during his trial, he changed his story to say that he stepped on his puppy, Lucy, when he attempted to apply the brakes.

Expert testimony estimated that Allard was traveling close to 50 mph in a 35 mph zone when he braked late for the stop sign, and that his victims were driving within the posted speed limit and had no alcohol in their systems.

Defense attorney Kelly Smith on Monday presented a string of character witnesses — including friends, former employers, Allard’s father and his ex-fiancée — who said that Allard had renounced alcohol since the collision.

The witnesses spoke of Allard as a man of responsibility and honesty, and said that the crime had been an example of a good person who made a bad mistake.

Prosecutor Marc Offenhartz, who characterized Allard on the day of the collision as “a ballistic missile fueled by alcohol,” expressed cynicism at Allard’s reputed responsibility.

After all, he noted, Allard had previously been convicted of DUI in 2000 but decided to drive drunk again on the night he killed the Velazquezes.

Three of the victim’s sons, Marco Mungia, Daniel Mungia and Angel Velazquez, were in the courtroom to advocate for two consecutive 10-1⁄2-year prison terms for Allard.

Diana Mungia, the victims’ daughter-in-law, read a letter written by Angel, 13, in which he said that Allard had “ruined (his) life.”

Mrs. Mungia also read a letter from her son, 8-year-old Arturo Mungia, who said: “I miss my grandma’s hugs and kisses, and I miss my grandpa taking me to the movies.”

Speaking on his own behalf, Allard said he had been thinking for four years about how he could express his remorse to the victims’ loved ones.

“The grief that I feel for the Velazquez family is honest and sincere,” he said. 

Herald/Review reporter Jonathan Clark can be reached at 515-4693 or by e-mail at jonathan.clark@bisbeereview.net.



Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments appear once they are approved. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   





    Rick Mc. wrote on Aug 18, 2007 9:24 PM:

    " I was Todd's cellmate when he got to the Tucson complex. Regardless of the crime commited, Todd is still agreat humanbeing. I was able to see the pain he lives with daily as a result of his actions. May God bless the victims, family and Todd also. "

    CJ wrote on Jun 9, 2007 11:19 AM:

    " This almost sounds like another Paris Hilton case, except she hasn't kill anyone (yet, plus the judge had the good sense to place her back in jail). I talked to my son, whom lives in a different state, he see a lot of this and couldn't believe that this man was getting off so easy. What is this showing other people, go a head, drive drunk, BUT if you hit someone make sure that they aren't wearing their seatbelts so you won't get as much jail time!! "

    Me wrote on Jun 6, 2007 8:00 AM:

    " Unbeleivable, Hoggart, you should find other work, ridiculous!!! "

    B wrote on Jun 5, 2007 8:01 PM:

    " You are right, Mr. Hoggatt. Two times in 39 years is NOT repeated drunk driving. "

    MN wrote on Jun 5, 2007 5:45 PM:

    " Dear Judge Hoggatt, Any chance you will reduce by half the punishment that Jose and Beatriz Velazquez received. According to the article you only had to consider they were not wearing their seat belts. Just how much of the drunk's punishment would you have removed if they had survived? This is not justice. "

    Cathy wrote on Jun 5, 2007 4:57 PM:

    " I find it reprehensible that Mr. Allard got his sentence reduced. After all, his drunk driving caused 2 people to die. Unlike what Mr. Gruen's would like us all to believe, "Had they been wearing belts, I think they would have walked away from this,” the truth remains had Mr. Allard chosen not to drive drunk that day the Velazqueze's would not have died that day. This makes me very suspicious of Mr. Gruen's credentials as a "collision expert". "

    Connie wrote on Jun 5, 2007 3:46 PM:

    " Drunks, wife and child beaters and illegal immigrants all seem to get lenient sentences in this county. "

    Enough is Enough wrote on Jun 5, 2007 1:16 PM:

    " When will we charge drunk drivers with premeditated murder? I understand there is a seatbelt law, but come on. Saying they were to blame is insane, it would be the same as saying if they stayed home they would still be around. The Velazquez family has been through enough, to make them have to go back to court and endure the mess this individual has put upon them. And having his 21 year sentence cut in half??? He was CONVICTED of DUI in 2000. "

    You'reKidding,RightHoggatt? wrote on Jun 5, 2007 11:11 AM:

    " “Had they been wearing belts, I think they would have walked away from this,” Gruen said. How about, if Allard wasn't a **REPEAT** drunk driver, the accident may have never happened in the first place? "

    CC wrote on Jun 5, 2007 10:55 AM:

    " I agree with "D". Also it seems like the drunk driver walks away (most of the time) and the innocent is killed. Who's to really say that the seatbelt would have saved their lives? What a pity, what a shame that our system works this way. "

    D wrote on Jun 5, 2007 7:55 AM:

    " I'm sorry-that's not right. So now since his sentence is halved, he can get out there much quicker and drink and drive and kill someone again much sooner. They say that he's "renounced" alcohol since the collision. Isn't it a little late for that now? Those kids lost their grandparents because of this guy's irresponsibility of drinking and driving. I think drunk drivers should be charged with murder because that's what it is. "

Community Videos



Additional recent videos can be viewed here


Use the arrows on each side of the player to for the next/previous video

Lastest U.S. Videos


In Tomorrow's Herald


Veggie nation: More is better when it comes to health boosting produce... in Taste.

Subscribe Today!

Photo Galleries

Contact Us


Staff Directory

Advertisement




Reader Poll



Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Faith and Spirituality